The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 167 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Guestnet se distingue en matiere de user-friendly interface , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Orana Software se distingue en ROI and onboarding .
Notes comparees basees sur 167 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
| Avis verifies | 165 | 2 |
Apres analyse de 167 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Guestnet apprecient surtout user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive, tandis que ceux de Orana Software mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 56 avis | #24 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #2 85 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 avis | #29 2 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #7 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 3 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and Orana Stay by Orana Software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to enhance guest communication and streamline services, but they do so with different strengths, user bases, and feature sets. Your team’s priorities—whether it's comprehensive integrations, recent reviews, or feature depth—will guide the best fit for your property.
Guestnet stands out with its extensive review count, recent feedback, and high overall ratings, making it the more proven choice in the current market. Orana Stay, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated and straightforward platform, particularly suited for boutique properties aiming for simplicity.
Guestnet and Orana Stay are designed to improve guest engagement through digital communication, but they diverge in their approach and maturity. Guestnet is a well-established platform with a global footprint, integrating with numerous systems and serving a variety of hotel segments. Its reviews highlight a high level of satisfaction, especially among larger hotels and resorts, with a 152 review count and recent feedback from 51 users in the last six months.
Orana Stay, by contrast, is a newer, smaller platform with only 2 reviews, none recent. Its focus is on boutique hotels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use and personalized guest interaction. While its reviews are positive, the lack of recent data makes assessing its current performance more challenging.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive integrations, and a broad market presence, Guestnet is the stronger option. If simplicity and a boutique feel are your priorities, Orana Stay might suffice, but the limited recent feedback suggests less confidence in its current capabilities.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable guest app with proven success and extensive integrations, go with Guestnet. Its critical mass of reviews and recent positive feedback show it adapts well to large and complex operations, providing features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, and digital compendiums.
If your hotel is a boutique property seeking a straightforward, branded digital concierge with basic guest communication and booking features, Orana Stay could be suitable. Its lower cost and simplicity appeal to small properties, but it lacks the extensive integrations and recent reviews of Guestnet.
For large hotels or resorts prioritizing proven reliability and comprehensive features, Guestnet is the clear choice. For small, independent hotels with minimal digital needs, Orana Stay may suffice, though caution is advised due to limited recent feedback.
Guestnet boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74/5 from its users, with onboarding rated at 4.66/5. Reviewers praise its intuitive interface, clear information layout, and automation capabilities, which reduce staff training time and speed up adoption. Many highlight how quickly their teams embraced the platform and how guests appreciated straightforward access to services.
Orana Stay scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simple, branded app design and straightforward setup. However, the limited sample size and absence of recent reviews mean less data on actual staff and guest adoption over time.
Edge: Guestnet, with its more extensive and recent user feedback, demonstrates more consistent ease of use across diverse hotel types.
Guestnet offers 8 shared features plus 4 exclusive to it, including mobile check-in, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and app downloads—features that directly enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its ability to integrate with systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit provides a high level of flexibility.
Orana Stay provides core features such as messaging, maps, weather updates, and booking capabilities but lacks the extensive feature set seen in Guestnet. It does not offer mobile check-in or room service options, limiting its utility for larger, more complex properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with more features and integrations, delivers a broader toolkit to elevate guest experience and streamline operations.
Guestnet’s support ratings are very high at 4.82/5, with reviewers citing helpful, responsive teams and seamless onboarding. Users appreciate the support’s availability and the platform’s ongoing development, which aligns with their operational needs.
Orana Stay, rated at 5/5, indicates excellent support, especially given its small team of five. However, the absence of recent reviews and a limited user base makes it difficult to gauge support consistency across all users.
Edge: Guestnet, with more recent reviews and a larger customer base, demonstrates a more reliable and proven support experience.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and POS systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Websline, ensuring compatibility with a wide variety of hotel management tools. This extensive network supports smoother operations across diverse hotel types and sizes.
Orana Stay has six verified integrations, including Sirvoy, Guesty, and Cloudbeds, offering decent options for boutique hotels. However, its smaller integration network may limit scalability or automation for larger properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with a far broader array of verified integrations, is better suited for hotels seeking extensive system connectivity.
Guestnet’s reviews are plentiful and recent, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.51/10 NPS score, indicating strong satisfaction across hotel segments, especially luxury and resort hotels. Larger hotels value its flexibility, automation, and integration capabilities.
Orana Stay, with only two reviews and no recent feedback, has a perfect 10/10 NPS but lacks enough data to assess broader hotel satisfaction. Boutique hotels have expressed appreciation for its simplicity, but the limited sample size makes this less conclusive.
Therefore, Guestnet has the edge thanks to its extensive, recent review data and high ratings.
Guestnet’s pricing begins at $500 per month with no freemium model or trial period, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. Its pricing structure suggests a focus on larger hotels or chains that need comprehensive features and integration.
Orana Stay costs $400 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options. Its lower price point and smaller scale suggest it is aimed at boutique hotels or small properties with basic needs.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal digital infrastructure, or if budget constraints are tight without flexibility.
Not ideal if you need advanced features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, or wide-ranging PMS integrations.
Guestnet excels in serving mid-sized to large hotels and resorts with its broad feature set, proven reliability, and extensive integrations. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm it’s a well-established, trusted platform capable of managing complex operations.
Orana Stay offers a lighter, user-friendly experience tailored to boutique hotels and small properties, with a focus on simplicity and direct guest communication. Its cost-effectiveness and ease of use make it suitable for hotels with limited digital infrastructure, but its lack of recent reviews warrants caution.
If your hotel values a comprehensive, proven solution with ongoing support, Guestnet is the clear choice. If your property is small, boutique, and looking for a basic, easy-to-deploy app, Orana Stay may serve your needs—though more recent feedback is needed to confirm its current performance.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Guestnet et Orana Stay partagent 8 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Enregistrement mobile | ||
| Paiement mobile | ||
| Téléchargement de l'application |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Guestnet et Orana Stay partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Guestnet propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Orana Stay en propose 6. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Orana Stay est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Guestnet : Non. Orana Stay : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Guestnet a un HT Score de 96 et Orana Software a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits