The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
GuestPro se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de GuestPro apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| GuestPro |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | GuestPro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | GuestPro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | GuestPro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial to your hotel’s operational success and guest satisfaction. Both GuestPro and Mews PMS aim to streamline workflows, but they diverge significantly in their current market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. With more than 750 recent reviews and a high overall rating, Mews clearly dominates in credibility and ongoing support. Does this make Mews the better choice for your hotel?
GuestPro promises simplicity and basic reservation management but lacks recent reviews and a visible market footprint, making it less reliable for future-proofing your operations. On the other hand, Mews has a robust ecosystem, extensive integrations, and a proven track record. Are you ready to entrust your hotel’s technology to the industry’s leading modern PMS?
GuestPro is presented as a straightforward system designed to meet fundamental property management needs. However, with zero reviews in the last six months and no recent user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge its actual performance or reliability.
Mews, by contrast, has 98 recent reviews from active users, with a stellar 4.62/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Users praise its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types from boutique to large chains.
GuestPro's lack of recent market activity suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hospitality needs, whereas Mews’s active ecosystem indicates ongoing innovation and support. Does your hotel need a system that’s actively supported and widely adopted?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with over 59 unique features, Mews is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for hotels seeking automation, robust integrations, and scalability, especially given its 336 verified partners and extensive third-party ecosystem.
GuestPro may appeal if your hotel is small or just starting out and needs a basic, less complex system. But, with no recent reviews or active market presence, it risks obsolescence and limited support. For hotels aiming for modern, future-ready technology, Mews offers proven value.
Mews has a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews, with many users emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface. Users highlight its quick onboarding process, and staff adoption is generally smooth, even for those without prior PMS experience.
GuestPro’s usability remains unverified through recent feedback, which raises questions about its user-friendliness. The absence of active reviews means it’s impossible to confirm if it offers the same straightforward experience. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated POS, automated night audits, and real-time reporting—virtually covering every hotel operation need.
GuestPro, with no unique features listed or verified, appears to lack the breadth and depth of automation and integrations that Mews provides. It’s unlikely to support the advanced operational demands of modern hotels. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.27/5 customer support rating from 98 recent reviews indicates consistent responsiveness and helpfulness. Users often highlight support as a key factor in their positive experience, with some noting prompt resolution of bugs and onboarding assistance.
GuestPro’s support remains unreviewed in recent times, making it difficult to assess reliability. The lack of recent feedback suggests that if support is crucial for your team, Mews is the safer, more dependable option. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, providing a flexible, extendable ecosystem for various hotel needs.
GuestPro reports no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability. The extensive third-party network in Mews allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack easily. Edge: Mews.
Given GuestPro’s lack of recent reviews or ratings, it’s impossible to gauge hotel sentiment or satisfaction levels. Mews, with its 4.62/5 rating from 98 recent reviews and a 93% recommendation rate, clearly earns higher marks.
Users across segments—from boutique hotels to large chains—appreciate Mews’s ease of use, automation, and support. The recency and volume of reviews solidify Mews’s reputation as a trusted choice. Edge: Mews.
GuestPro’s pricing details are unavailable, which suggests it may lack transparent or scalable pricing options.
Mews charges a base fee of $900 monthly, with no mention of per-room or additional charges. While this might be a significant investment, it reflects the breadth of features and support included. For hotels seeking clear cost expectations, Mews’s pricing structure is transparent enough to plan around.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews offers a comprehensive, actively supported, and highly rated PMS with 59 features, over 336 integrations, and a proven track record. It’s designed for hotels that need automation, scalability, and modern guest experiences.
GuestPro might serve very small properties or those with minimal operational complexity, but its lack of recent reviews and active market presence make it a risky choice for long-term growth. If your hotel aims for efficiency and future-proofing, Mews is the clear winner.
In summary, Mews’s market presence, extensive feature set, and recent positive user feedback make it the safer, smarter investment for most hotels. Its flexibility and support ensure your team can focus on what matters most—delivering exceptional guest experiences.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| GuestPro |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, GuestPro et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | GuestPro |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. GuestPro et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. GuestPro propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
GuestPro : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. GuestPro a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits