The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Hogatex se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Hogatex apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Hogatex |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Hogatex PMS by Hogatex and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but Hogatex offers a nearly nonexistent online presence and zero reviews, indicating it might not be a viable option for modern hoteliers. Mews, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with an impressive 4.62 out of 5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend—making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven, current technology.
If your priority is a system backed by active user feedback and ongoing innovation, Mews clearly leads. Hogatex’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s either nascent or inactive, raising doubts about its support and future development. Are you comfortable navigating an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with extensive community validation?
Hogatex presents as a property management solution, but with no available reviews or recent activity, it's difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Mews, by contrast, boasts 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, emphasizing its active development and customer engagement—factors critical for today’s hotel operators. The stark difference suggests Mews is the safer, more tested option, especially for hotels seeking modern, scalable management.
Hogatex’s absence of a review base means you lack insight into real-world performance, support quality, or feature reliability. Meanwhile, Mews’s high review count and recent feedback highlight a well-established platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Which would you rather rely on for your hotel’s future?
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with a notable 4.27 for customer support, reflecting a user-friendly interface and reliable onboarding. Hogatex, with a rating of zero, offers no data to support its ease of use or staff adoption—raising questions about implementation clarity.
Most Mews users praise the platform’s intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training requirements, citing the onboarding process as smooth and staff adoption high. Hogatex’s lack of review data suggests it may lack the user-focused design needed for efficient adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite with 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated channel manager, mobile apps, and advanced reporting—features crucial for modern hotel management. Hogatex provides none of these, indicating a likely limited or non-existent feature set.
The depth and breadth of Mews’s features enable it to serve diverse hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with capabilities that support revenue growth and operational control. Hogatex’s minimal feature offering suggests it’s either very early-stage or not designed for comprehensive hotel management. The clear edge goes to Mews.
Mews scores 4.27 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Hogatex has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality, responsiveness, or user satisfaction.
In the hospitality industry, reliable support is vital for smooth operations and quick resolution of issues. Mews’s active support team and positive reviews demonstrate its commitment, whereas Hogatex’s silence indicates a potential risk. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including industry-leading channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, offering a flexible, connected tech ecosystem. Hogatex, with zero verified partnerships, likely has limited or no integrations, restricting its utility in a multi-channel environment.
The extensive integrations of Mews allow hotels to customize their tech stack, automate workflows, and optimize revenue. Hogatex’s lack of integrations suggests it’s not built for the interconnected, modern hospitality landscape. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, Mews is clearly favored by hoteliers across various segments, from boutique hotels to large chains. Hogatex, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated, indicating no proven user satisfaction.
Hotels that have adopted Mews often praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, boosting confidence in its reliability and scalability. Hogatex’s lack of feedback means hoteliers must rely on assumptions rather than proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Hogatex pricing is unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and potential costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, providing clarity upfront.
While Mews’s cost may seem significant, its comprehensive features and active support justify the investment, especially considering the ROI and efficiency gains reported. Hogatex’s price is unknown, making it difficult to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Given Hogatex’s limited feature set and no active reviews, it’s best suited for properties with minimal management complexity or those willing to develop their own solution.
Mews excels across multiple segments, from luxury to budget, and is suited for properties aiming to modernize and grow.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands of hotels globally, with active development and support evidenced by recent reviews. Hogatex, with no reviews or recent activity, is unlikely to meet the needs of modern hoteliers or support growth.
If your hotel values a proven, highly-rated system that integrates seamlessly and offers ongoing innovation, Mews is the clear choice. Hogatex’s limited data and feature set suggest it’s not suitable for hotels looking to scale or improve operational efficiency.
Choose Mews if you want a reliable, customizable platform with proven support and community trust. Opt for Hogatex only if your hotel has very specific, minimal needs and you’re prepared to manage its limitations without the backing of a vibrant user base or active development.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Hogatex |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Hogatex PMS et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Hogatex PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Hogatex PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Hogatex PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Hogatex a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits