The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Hotello se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Hotello apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing between Hotello PMS by Hotello and HotelTime PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ substantially in features, market presence, and user feedback. Hotello, acquired by Mews, is a less-established product with no recent reviews and no publicly available ratings, which makes it difficult to gauge its current performance. HotelTime, on the other hand, boasts over 430 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.83/5, and recent positive feedback from a global client base.
The core challenge lies in evaluating whether to trust a newer, less-reviewed solution or opt for a proven, feature-rich platform with widespread adoption and recent satisfied users. Which system aligns better with your operational goals and guest experience priorities?
Hotello PMS positions itself as a cloud-based product with a focus on design elegance and reliability, claiming to simplify hotel management and improve guest interaction. However, with no recent reviews or ratings available, its actual performance and customer satisfaction are unverified. HotelTime, meanwhile, is a mature platform with over 430 reviews, a 4.83/5 score, and a recent NPS score of 9.26/10, demonstrating strong user confidence and ongoing customer advocacy.
Hotello claims to be adaptable and human-centric, but it lacks publicly available evidence of recent user experiences or case studies. HotelTime’s latest reviews highlight its ease of access, automation features, and continuous updates, making it a safer choice for hoteliers seeking dependable performance. Are you comfortable betting on a product with no recent customer feedback, or do you prefer a platform with proven satisfaction and ongoing support?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS with a focus on reliability and a clean interface, Hotello might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews makes this a gamble. Conversely, HotelTime suits properties seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich solution that supports large operations and offers extensive integrations, proven by its robust review base and high ratings.
For small to medium hotels prioritizing ease of use, HotelTime’s current customer satisfaction makes it the clear choice. Larger resorts or chains that need advanced automation, reporting, and multi-property management will benefit more from HotelTime’s proven capabilities. Which system offers the track record and features needed for your property’s scale and complexity?
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66/5 and is praised for its intuitiveness by recent reviews, with users highlighting simplified reservation management and real-time reporting. Hotello’s interface, lacking recent ratings and reviews, remains unverified but emphasizes design elegance and developer focus on human-centered workflows.
HotelTime’s onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, with reviews emphasizing quick setup and ongoing support, whereas Hotello offers no recent user feedback to assess ease of use. Edge: HotelTime. If operational simplicity and proven user satisfaction are what matter most, HotelTime’s recent reviews clearly favor it.
HotelTime offers 51 features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audits, and more than 10 modules designed for operational efficiency. Hotello, by comparison, claims to be a reliable cloud solution but provides no publicly available list of features or recent updates, making it difficult to assess its scope.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set is demonstrated by its broad partner integrations and proven automation tools. Hotello’s claims of adaptability and simplicity are uncorroborated by recent data. Edge: HotelTime. For a feature-rich, well-supported platform, HotelTime clearly leads.
Recent reviews of HotelTime consistently praise its support team for responsiveness and helpfulness, with a 4.73/5 customer support rating and comments like, “The support staff is always on the other end of the phone.” Hotello’s customer support rating and reviews are unavailable, placing it at a disadvantage in this critical area.
HotelTime’s onboarding and support are frequently cited as key strengths, essential for smooth implementation and ongoing success. Edge: HotelTime. If reliable support is a priority—especially for remote or complex operations—HotelTime’s recent positive feedback makes it the smarter choice.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partners, including key integrations with STR, TrustYou, Amadeus, and a host of third-party systems like Profitroom and Bookboost. Hotello has only 16 verified integrations, with some notable partners like Sage, Innspire, and Rate Yield.
Given the importance of seamless connectivity in modern hotel operations, HotelTime’s broader and more current integration ecosystem makes it the superior choice. Edge: HotelTime. If your hotel relies on extensive third-party systems, HotelTime’s ecosystem will serve you better.
HotelTime’s latest reviews indicate a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support. In contrast, Hotello has no recent reviews or ratings to reflect current user sentiment, making it impossible to gauge satisfaction.
HotelTime’s high volume of recent reviews confirms ongoing customer confidence across various hotel types, from boutique to resorts. Edge: HotelTime. For proven, high-rated satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear leader.
Hotello’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of trial, subscription model, or setup fees. HotelTime charges a base price of $600, with no free tier or trial, but its transparent pricing and extensive feature set justify the value.
Without concrete data, Hotello’s costs remain uncertain, which complicates budget planning. HotelTime’s clear pricing structure offers better upfront transparency. Edge: HotelTime for clarity and value.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hotello PMS offers a promising concept: a cloud-based platform tailored to reliability and guest management. However, with no recent reviews or customer satisfaction data, its true performance remains unverified—making it a risky choice for hotels that value proven results.
HotelTime excels in delivering a feature-rich, well-supported platform with thousands of satisfied users and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations, automation, and support make it ideal for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable PMS that improves operational efficiency.
If your hotel needs a well-established, comprehensive system with a track record of customer satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear choice. Hotello may appeal to properties willing to take a chance on a less-tested product, but for assured performance, HotelTime remains the safer bet.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) propose 16 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Hotello a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 91. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits