The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Inaxel se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Inaxel apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Inaxel |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Inaxel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Inaxel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Inaxel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
As a hotelier evaluating property management systems, your primary focus is on choosing a platform that streamlines operations, boosts revenue, and enhances guest satisfaction. Inaxel by Inaxel and Mews PMS both aim to solve these challenges but diverge significantly in approach, user experience, and market presence. With over 750 recent reviews, Mews clearly dominates in user feedback and current relevance; Inaxel’s lack of reviews suggests it’s less proven in real-world hotel environments. Are you ready for a proven system with extensive support and features?
Inaxel is positioned as a revenue management tool designed to analyze financial data and offer actionable insights. However, it lacks reviews, user ratings, and a clear market footprint, making it difficult to assess its reliability or real-world effectiveness. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, indicating high hotel satisfaction and strong customer loyalty. Its cloud-based system automates operational tasks, from reservations to billing, with a proven track record. Given the stark contrast, Mews offers a more validated and comprehensive solution, especially for hotels seeking operational automation.
If your hotel needs a full-featured property management system that integrates reservations, guest management, and revenue optimization, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set—over 59 unique functions—supports day-to-day operations, guest engagement, and financial reporting, making it suitable for a broad range of hotel types. If your focus is purely on revenue analysis without operational management, and you are prepared to risk untested software, Inaxel might be considered, but the lack of user feedback makes this a risky choice. For most hoteliers, Mews’s proven capabilities are the decisive factor.
Mews’s UI is rated at 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, modern design, and ease of onboarding. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.39/5, with users highlighting how quickly they could set up and start using the platform. Inaxel’s user experience is unverified due to lack of reviews, but as a revenue system, it likely lacks the comprehensive, user-friendly interface that Mews offers. Based on available data, Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a feature-rich platform with 59 functionalities, including multi-lingual support, a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, online check-in/out, integrated POS, and real-time reporting. Inaxel provides no verified features or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature depth or breadth. With such a significant gap, the advantage is clear: Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support is rated at 4.27/5, with reviews citing quick responses, helpful onboarding, and active support teams that resolve issues promptly. Conversely, Inaxel has a 0/5 support rating due to no reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. For a hotel investing in critical operations, reliable support is non-negotiable; therefore, Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and third-party apps, enabling a tailored, connected environment. Inaxel has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its potential for customization and operational coherence. For flexibility and future-proofing, Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews, predominantly recent, rate the platform at 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique, independent, and city-center hotels. Inaxel has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge satisfaction or effectiveness. Clearly, Mews is the more trusted and valued by the hotel community; Edge: Mews.
Inaxel’s pricing details are unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and value. Mews charges a $900 monthly base fee, with no implementation or additional costs mentioned, providing clarity for budgeting. Given the transparency and proven ROI of Mews, it offers better value in terms of predictable costs.
Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and high hotel satisfaction ratings. Its over 750 recent reviews and strong support infrastructure make it the trusted choice for hotels aiming to modernize operations and grow profitability.
Inaxel, on the other hand, appears to be a revenue-focused tool with no recent user feedback or verified features, making it a speculative choice. For most hotels, especially those looking for a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS, Mews is the clear winner.
If your hotel needs a fully integrated management platform that improves efficiency and guest experiences, go with Mews. It’s the system most hoteliers trust to deliver operational excellence and revenue growth.
Choose Inaxel only if you are prepared to gamble on unverified performance, and your needs are limited to revenue analysis without operational complexity. For most, the definitive choice is Mews.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Inaxel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Inaxel et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Inaxel |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Inaxel et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Inaxel propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Inaxel : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Inaxel a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits