The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Isidoro se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Isidoro apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Isidoro |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Isidoro by Isidoro and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both claim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, user base, and support vary significantly. Isidoro’s platform is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, while Mews boasts a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews and a high user rating. Which system will truly serve your hotel today and scale with you tomorrow?
If your priority is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types, Mews stands out. Conversely, Isidoro's minimal review data and absence of a recent user base make it difficult to assess its true performance or suitability.
Both Isidoro and Mews aim to simplify hotel operations, but their approaches diverge sharply. Isidoro offers no public feature list, no verified integrations, and no recent reviews, raising questions about its capabilities and support. Mews, on the other hand, provides over 59 unique features, more than 336 verified integrations, and hundreds of recent reviews that consistently praise its ease of use, support, and flexibility.
Mews’s recent reviews from nearly 100 hotels in the last six months, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its relevance and reliability. Isidoro's lack of recent data and zero reviews make it impossible to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Are you willing to take a chance on an unproven system, or do you prefer a solution with validated performance?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear choice. It caters well to boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties, offering modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel operates a single property with minimal complexity, and you're comfortable with an untested platform, Isidoro might seem appealing, but there's no recent data to confirm this. For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term scalability, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment.
Mews is praised by users for its intuitive, modern interface, with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 758 reviews, and a straightforward onboarding process scored similarly. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff adopt Mews, citing its clean design and helpful training resources.
In contrast, Isidoro’s ease of use is not documented publicly, with no reviews or ratings available. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to compare usability directly, but given Mews’s extensive positive reviews, it’s clear that Mews is the more user-friendly option. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, advanced booking engines, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and extensive integrations. These features enable a hotel to personalize the guest journey, automate operations, and connect to a broad tech ecosystem.
Isidoro’s feature set is not publicly available or verified, with no specific modules or functionalities listed. Without concrete information, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers comparable capabilities. Based on available data, Mews’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support has been rated 4.27/5 by users, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users often mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, with some noting their proactive communication during onboarding.
Isidoro’s customer support is unreviewed and unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s high support ratings and consistent recent praise, it’s clear that Mews provides more reliable, accessible support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, offering a comprehensive ecosystem. This enables hotels to tailor their tech stack for operations, revenue, and guest experience enhancements.
Isidoro reports no verified partners, raising concerns about its capability to connect with other hotel systems. Without proven integrations, Isidoro’s flexibility is questionable. Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant practical advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 758 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% recommendation rate from diverse properties including boutique hotels, hostels, resorts, and chains. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and extensive features, particularly for mid-sized and larger operations.
Isidoro’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The recent and plentiful positive feedback for Mews decisively favors it as the trusted, high-rated choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900/month with no free tier or trial, which might be a barrier for some small properties. Isidoro’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no recent reviews or user data, it’s unclear whether it offers a competitive or scalable pricing model.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clear financial benchmark. Without data supporting Isidoro’s cost-effectiveness, Mews’s price point, supported by extensive positive reviews, remains a more concrete indicator of value.
Not ideal if:
Edge: None (uncertain due to lack of data).
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-packed PMS supported by a large user community and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem, high support ratings, and documented success stories make it a reliable partner for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
Isidoro’s platform remains unreviewed and unverified, with no recent data to confirm its capabilities or support quality. For hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, Mews’s established track record makes it the clear choice.
If you want a system with proven functionality, seamless integrations, and happy users, go with Mews.
If your hotel has minimal needs and is willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Isidoro might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features position it as the smarter, safer investment for your hotel’s management system today.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Isidoro |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Isidoro et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Isidoro et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Isidoro propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Isidoro : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Isidoro a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits