The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
KrossBooking se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de KrossBooking apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between KrossBooking and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to manage reservations and streamline operations but diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. While KrossBooking claims to be a comprehensive property management system, its lack of recent reviews and near-zero user feedback cast doubt on its effectiveness. Conversely, Mews boasts a robust, widely adopted platform with nearly 760 recent reviews, making it a more reliable choice.
Are you looking for a proven, well-supported platform with extensive integrations and a track record of innovation? Or are you exploring a newer, less tested solution that might still be under development? The decision should be based on data-backed confidence and existing user experiences.
KrossBooking positions itself as a comprehensive property management system but offers no recent reviews or verified ratings, signaling limited market adoption and unproven performance. Mews, on the other hand, has a 4.62/5 rating based on hundreds of recent reviews and an NPS of 9.12/5, reflecting high user satisfaction and ongoing innovation.
While KrossBooking aims to streamline reservation management, it lacks the extensive feature set and global presence that Mews provides. Mews’s cloud-native platform supports everything from automated check-in to integrated payments, backed by a thriving ecosystem of over 336 third-party integrations. Do you want a platform with proven scalability and a large support network? Or are you comfortable with a lesser-known system with unverified functionality?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its strong reputation across a broad range of hotel types—especially boutique, mid-sized, and chain properties—makes it ideal for growth-oriented teams.
If, however, your hotel is seeking a simple reservation system or a solution specifically tailored to a very niche operation without needing advanced automation or multi-property management, KrossBooking might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews and no clear pricing or feature details, it’s hard to justify over a platform with a track record of customer satisfaction like Mews.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training. Support from Mews is rated 4.27/5, with many reviews highlighting their rapid response and helpful onboarding process.
KrossBooking, by contrast, has a rating of 0/5 on the same scale, and no recent reviews are available. This stark absence of feedback suggests uncertainty about its user experience and support quality. Given Mews’s proven track record and high satisfaction, edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated CRS, mobile apps, automated reports, and extensive payment options. These features empower hotels to operate efficiently and deliver a modern guest experience.
KrossBooking provides no verified features or detailed descriptions, making it impossible to compare directly. Its lack of advertised functionalities and no recent user feedback heavily favor Mews, which’s proven to support diverse hotel operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support is highly rated at 4.27/5, with reviews praising their quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Many users mention that Mews support helps smooth the implementation and day-to-day operation, reducing downtime.
KrossBooking, with zero reviews and ratings, offers no evidence of support quality or responsiveness. Without user feedback or a support reputation, Mews’s established support system clearly edges out. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including extensive partnerships with channel managers, revenue tools, and payment processors. Its open API and Mews Marketplace enable customization and scalability for growing hotels.
KrossBooking reports zero verified partners, limiting its integration potential and flexibility. For hotels seeking a connected, future-proof system, Mews’s ecosystem provides a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high ratings across hotel segments, with an average of 4.64/5 in some reviews and an overall 4.62/5 score. Larger and boutique hotels, as well as chains, praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
KrossBooking has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Given the recent, detailed positive feedback for Mews, it’s the clear choice. Edge: Mews.
KrossBooking’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or transparent pricing model. Mews charges a starting fee of $900 monthly, with no implementation costs and no mention of per-room charges.
The transparency and clarity of Mews's pricing, along with its proven value in operational efficiencies, make it the more predictable investment. Edge: Mews.
Given the lack of recent reviews and limited feature information, KrossBooking is suited for very small or highly niche operations looking for a straightforward reservation tool.
Mews’s broad functionality makes it well-suited for diverse property types, especially those aiming for innovation and operational efficiency.
Mews stands out as the more mature, feature-rich, and widely supported platform. Its high ratings, extensive integrations, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice for hotels looking to modernize and scale.
KrossBooking, with no recent reviews or verified capabilities, remains a less proven option. It may serve very small or niche operators temporarily but lacks the ecosystem and confidence needed for long-term growth.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS, choose Mews. If you’re exploring a very basic, untested system for a minimal operation, KrossBooking might be worth a cautious trial — but the risks are significant given the limited data.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| KrossBooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, KrossBooking et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. KrossBooking et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. KrossBooking propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
KrossBooking : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. KrossBooking a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits