The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
LMPM se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de LMPM apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| LMPM |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between LMPM by LMPM and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Do you prioritize a system with a proven track record and extensive integrations, or a niche solution tailored for vacation rentals with automation focus?
LMPM is a largely unreviewed system, offering minimal data and no recent feedback to support its claims, whereas Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews with a near-perfect rating. Given this, which platform provides the confidence and features your hotel needs to thrive today?
LMPM appears to be a property management system designed for vacation rentals, promising automation and real-time insights. However, with zero recent reviews and no rating available, there’s no clear evidence of its performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62 out of 5 rating based on 758 reviews, with nearly 100 in the last six months alone—indicating ongoing development and strong user confidence.
While LMPM may claim to simplify operations, the absence of user feedback raises questions about its reliability and feature completeness. Mews, on the other hand, is a recognized leader in the space, especially for hotels seeking a robust, cloud-based platform. Is a vendor with proven reviews and active user engagement the safer choice for your hotel’s future?
If your hotel needs a flexible, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace and proven track record make it suitable for a range of property types, from boutique to large-scale operations. If you have very specific, niche needs for vacation rentals and prefer a system tailored solely for that segment, LMPM might seem appealing—though the lack of recent user feedback makes this a risky proposition.
For hotels prioritizing reliable support, continuous innovation, and proven scalability, Mews is the clear leader. LMPM’s limited data and unverified claims make it difficult to recommend confidently, especially when choosing a critical system that impacts daily operations and guest experiences.
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, based on more than 750 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Reviews for LMPM provide no recent data or ratings, leaving its usability unverified and potentially unreliable.
Given the overwhelming user feedback, Mews’ user interface is modern, straightforward, and adaptable to staff needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated reminders, task management, real-time reporting, and extensive payment options. LMPM, by contrast, lists no features or integrations, leaving its functional scope entirely unknown.
Mews’ feature depth and active development cycle provide hotels with tools to optimize operations and guest engagement. Without verified features, LMPM cannot compete. Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.27 out of 5 rating for customer support, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users note that support is generally prompt, with issues resolved swiftly, despite occasional bugs.
LMPM’s support quality cannot be assessed as there are no recent reviews or ratings available. Given Mews’ active support ecosystem and positive feedback, it is the safer option. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, offering extensive flexibility. LMPM has zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and scalability.
This broad ecosystem allows hoteliers to customize workflows, automate processes, and connect with third-party solutions effortlessly. Without integrations, LMPM’s utility is severely limited. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews are 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.12/5. Hoteliers across segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
LMPM’s lack of reviews and ratings means no data exists on user satisfaction. The recent, extensive feedback for Mews underscores its value and reliability. Edge: Mews.
LMPM does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or undocumented fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fee, but it’s a fixed fee typical for enterprise-grade PMS.
While Mews’s cost might seem higher, the value comes from its features, integrations, support, and proven track record. The opacity of LMPM’s pricing makes it difficult to evaluate its value proposition.
Given the lack of recent review data, LMPM is better suited for very small, uncomplicated setups where risk tolerance is high.
Mews supports a diverse range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with proven success in streamlining operations and enhancing guest experiences.
Mews stands out as a mature, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with a large, active user base. Its extensive integrations, positive recent reviews, and proven track record make it the safer choice for hotels looking to modernize and grow.
LMPM’s limited data, unverified claims, and absence of recent reviews place it at a significant disadvantage. Unless your property operates in a highly niche market with minimal integration needs, Mews is the recommended platform to support your hotel’s future.
In conclusion, if confidence, functionality, and ongoing support are priorities, go with Mews. It offers the reliability and tools your hotel needs to succeed in today’s competitive landscape.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| LMPM |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, LMPM et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. LMPM et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. LMPM propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
LMPM : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. LMPM a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits