The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Sphère Informatique se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Sphère Informatique apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Logiciel Chloe by Sphère Informatique and Mews PMS boils down to your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in approach, user experience, and market presence. Your team needs to evaluate whether a specialized, less-reviewed system or a highly-rated, widely adopted solution best fits your current situation.
Sphère Informatique offers a niche AI-driven platform with limited reviews and regional focus, while Mews boasts a global footprint, extensive features, and a robust review base. Are you ready to prioritize proven scalability and community support or a tailored, AI-focused system?
Logiciel Chloe and Mews seek to streamline property management, but their approaches are distinct. Chloe emphasizes AI-powered insights and automation suited for property owners and managers deeply involved in real estate performance. Conversely, Mews focuses on operational automation, guest experience, and integration across multiple hotel functions.
While Chloe’s niche AI capabilities aim to enhance decision-making, its minimal and outdated review presence (none in the last six months, zero overall score) diminishes confidence. Mews’s recent reviews (98 in the last six months) reflect active user engagement, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more reliable choice. Do you want a platform with proven community backing or one still garnering trust?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS that can scale across multiple properties and integrate with a vast ecosystem, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace, over 336 verified integrations, and 4.62/5 rating from hundreds of recent reviews make it ideal for mid-size to large hotels seeking operational agility and guest-focused innovations.
If your hotel prioritizes AI-driven property management for real estate or tenant-focused operations, Chloe might be suitable—though with limited reviews and regional focus, its impact remains uncertain. For most hoteliers, Mews’s proven track record and global support should guide your decision.
Mews’s UI scores a 4.7/5, with reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Staff report that Mews is easy to learn and adopt, with many mentioning how it simplifies daily operations and staff training.
Chloe’s usability is unverified, with no recent reviews or scores. Given the extensive positive feedback on Mews’s user experience, it clearly leads in ease of use. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, integrated CRS, mobile app, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Its marketplace allows connection to over 1,000 external tools, providing flexibility for diverse operational needs.
Chloe has no listed features or integrations, and its AI focus appears to be its core differentiator. However, the lack of detailed functionality, recent review activity, or user feedback makes it difficult to assess its practicality. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores a 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and smooth onboarding processes. Users appreciate the continuous platform updates and responsive support team, even amid occasional bugs.
Chloe’s support is unreviewed, with no recent data to gauge customer service quality. Given Mews’s active, highly-rated support network, it clearly provides a better support experience. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including channel managers, revenue tools, and payment systems, making it highly adaptable. Shared partners include Experience Hotel, SiteMinder, and Onity, with unique integrations like Criton and Orange Hotel Marketing.
Sphère Informatique’s integration count is limited to 11 verified partners, with only HostelGalaxy.com as an exclusive connection. For extensive automation and ecosystem flexibility, Mews’s broad integration network is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent and plentiful—98 in the last six months—culminating in an overall rating of 4.62/5 and a 93% recommendation rate. Hoteliers across segments like boutique, city center, and independent hotels praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Chloe remains unrated and lacks recent feedback, preventing a meaningful comparison. For hoteliers seeking peer-validated satisfaction, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Chloe’s pricing details are unavailable, with no trial, flat monthly fee, or implementation costs listed. This opacity makes budget planning difficult.
Mews charges a base price of $900 monthly, with no additional implementation fees or trial options. Given the transparency and widespread adoption, Mews offers clearer value expectations. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews’s main advantage is its widespread adoption, active user base, and proven functionalities across diverse hotel types. Its extensive feature set and integrations support a broad range of operational needs, making it suitable for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
Chloe, with its AI emphasis, suits niche hotel or property management scenarios but lacks recent reviews and a broad market footprint, making it a riskier choice for most hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich platform supported by a vibrant community, go with Mews. Its recent reviews, integrations, and support affirm its value for today’s hotel management challenges.
Choose Chloe if your focus is on AI-driven insights for single-property real estate management, and you’re comfortable working with a less-tested platform. But for most hotels, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, smarter choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Logiciel Chloe et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Logiciel Chloe et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Logiciel Chloe propose 11 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Logiciel Chloe : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Sphère Informatique a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits