The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
lucid se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de lucid apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| lucid |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | lucid |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | lucid |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | lucid |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Lucid and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ substantially. Lucid touts AI-driven insights, while Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a strong user experience. Which platform aligns better with your operational priorities and growth plans?
Lucid's AI summaries are designed for decision-making, but its lack of user reviews and limited regional presence mean less reliable real-world validation. Mews, with over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, offers proven performance. Are you ready for a mature system with tangible user feedback?
Lucid and Mews address hotel management challenges but target different strengths. Lucid focuses on data analysis and AI recommendations to support strategic decisions, while Mews emphasizes daily operational automation and guest experience enhancement. Where does your hotel need the most support: high-level insights or operational efficiency?
Lucid’s AI summaries and recommendations aim to reduce decision fatigue and improve strategic planning. Conversely, Mews automates reservations, billing, housekeeping, and guest interactions, reducing manual work and errors. Do you prefer a platform that provides insights or one that streamlines routine tasks?
Given Mews's extensive review base, recent positive feedback, and industry awards, it clearly demonstrates market validation. Lucid’s lack of reviews and narrow focus make it harder to gauge real-world performance. Which platform do you trust more to support your daily hotel operations?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system with a proven track record, go with Mews. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes that want automation, integrations, and a modern interface—especially if you value an active user community and ongoing support.
If your team’s primary goal is to leverage AI-driven insights to inform strategic decisions and your hotel has the resources to implement a less established platform, Lucid might appeal. However, its zero reviews and limited regional presence make it a riskier choice for immediate operational needs.
For hoteliers seeking an all-in-one solution with reliable support and proven results, Mews is the clear winner. For those prioritizing data-driven strategy, be wary of Lucid’s untested market presence.
Mews has a 4.7/5 ease of use rating based on over 750 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and quick onboarding. Many highlight how staff adoption is swift, and the platform’s cloud-based nature makes remote management simple.
Lucid, with a 0/5 rating, provides no user feedback or review data, making it impossible to assess usability. Its AI-driven approach might appeal to tech-savvy teams, but without proven user experience, it’s likely less accessible for day-to-day hotel staff.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, task management, and real-time reporting—features crucial for operational control and guest satisfaction. Many of these are missing in Lucid, which appears to focus mainly on AI summaries without dedicated hotel management modules.
Lucid’s unique selling point is its AI summaries and recommendations, but it lacks core PMS features like reservation management, billing, channel integration, and housekeeping modules, which Mews provides at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores 4.27/5 on customer support, with reviews praising its responsive onboarding, prompt bug fixing, and extensive resources like Mews University. Users state support is “quick and helpful,” especially during implementation, and appreciate ongoing assistance.
Lucid has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. For a hotelier who values reliable, proven support, Mews’s support infrastructure is a key advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and a marketplace with over 1,000 third-party apps. This vast ecosystem enables customization and operational flexibility.
Lucid, with zero verified integrations, offers no clear pathway for extending functionality or connecting with other critical hotel systems. For hotels relying on a connected tech stack, Mews’s integrations are essential.
Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across segments—boutique, city-center, and resorts—appreciate its ease of use, support, and features, confirming its reputation as a trusted platform.
Lucid has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given Mews’s proven track record, it’s the clear choice for reliability and user approval.
Edge: Mews.
Lucid’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be a bespoke or emerging platform. Mews’s base price starts at $900 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, offering a predictable cost structure.
If budget predictability is essential, Mews’s transparent pricing allows for easier ROI calculations. Lucid’s unclear pricing makes financial planning more challenging.
Mews offers a mature, widely adopted hotel management platform with proven features, real-world validation, and a large user community. Its focus on automation, integrations, and user support makes it the safer choice for hotels looking to optimize daily operations and guest satisfaction.
Lucid’s AI summaries and decision support could complement existing systems but remain untested in the hotel industry. It may suit innovative teams with in-house tech capability, but for immediate, reliable results, Mews is superior.
If you want a trusted, comprehensive PMS with recent reviews backing its performance, go with Mews. If your hotel is experimenting with AI insights and has the technical resources to support a less proven platform, Lucid warrants consideration—but at your own risk.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| lucid |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, lucid et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | lucid |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. lucid et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. lucid propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
lucid : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. lucid a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits