The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 888 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Marriott International se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 888 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 888 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Marriott International apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #59 1 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #68 1 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #60 1 avis | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #43 1 avis | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both FOSSE by Marriott International and Mews PMS tackle core hotel functions like reservations, billing, and guest management, but they diverge significantly in usability, features, and support. Given the stark differences in review volume and recency, Mews emerges as the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Are you looking for a system that’s easy to adopt and keeps pace with modern hospitality? Or do you prefer a proprietary platform tied to a global hotel brand? Let’s compare these two options head-to-head.
FOSSE is Marriott’s proprietary platform designed exclusively for its properties, meaning it’s deeply integrated with Marriott’s ecosystem. However, it’s heavily menu-driven, lacks a graphical user interface (GUI), and offers a dated user experience, as reflected in its low 2/5 overall rating from just one review.
In contrast, Mews is a cloud-native, third-party PMS with over 750 reviews, boasting a 4.62/5 rating and a recent surge of 98 reviews in the last six months. Users praise its modern interface, ease of use, and extensive third-party integrations. Do you want a system with proven scalability and community support? Or a proprietary solution limited to one brand?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, user-friendly PMS that supports a wide variety of property types—from boutique to large chains—Mews should be your go-to. Its extensive third-party connectivity and open API empower you to customize workflows and integrate new tools effortlessly.
If you’re part of Marriott’s ecosystem and prefer a system built specifically for their operational procedures, FOSSE might seem appealing—though it’s notably less intuitive and less supported. Given the recent reviews’ volume and recency, Mews’s community-backed reliability makes it the clear choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores a high 4.7/5 on ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface, and straightforward onboarding. Support and training are rated highly, and users report staff adopting the system quickly due to its clear design.
FOSSE, however, has a rating of just 2/5 for ease of use. Reviewers describe it as menu-heavy, lacking a GUI, and key-stroke intensive, which hampers productivity and staff onboarding. Given the recent active feedback, Mews’s user-friendliness is indisputable.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive suite of 59 features, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, digital check-in, mobile housekeeping, and more. Its marketplace hosts over 1,000 integrations, allowing full customization.
FOSSE’s features are limited, with only core functionalities embedded within Marriott’s ecosystem, and no detailed feature list available. Its lack of modern capabilities and integrations places it well behind Mews’s broad functionality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are strong, with a 4.27/5 score and recent reviews highlighting prompt assistance and responsive support teams. Guests note that support is proactive and helpful, especially during onboarding.
FOSSE’s support appears limited, with only a 3/5 rating and criticism about delays and manual processes. Its support experience is less documented, and given the small review count, Mews’s support remains more reliable.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS, revenue tools, and many specialized integrations. Its open API and marketplace facilitate adding new partners quickly.
FOSSE has only 2 verified partnerships, with no detailed list of integrations. Its limited connectivity hampers adaptability in a competitive hotel landscape.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.64/5 rating from 679 reviews, with independent hotels, boutique properties, and city hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Users consistently recommend it for scalability and flexibility.
FOSSE has only one review with a 2/5 rating, criticizing its complexity and lack of user-friendliness. The recent review data favors Mews in reputation and user satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
FOSSE’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, being an internal Marriott system, with costs absorbed into broader enterprise agreements. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or ongoing fees, making its pricing transparent and scalable.
Since direct FOSSE pricing isn’t available, Mews’s straightforward pricing model offers better predictability for hotels considering ROI and budget planning.
Edge: Mews.
FOSSE is a proprietary system built for Marriott’s vast ecosystem, designed to serve large, brand-aligned properties. Its complexity, limited integrations, and low user scores make it less suitable for independent hoteliers or those seeking agility.
Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, highly rated, and feature-rich platform favored by a broad spectrum of properties. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and active user community make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Choose FOSSE if you operate within Marriott and need seamless brand integration. Opt for Mews if you want a flexible, scalable, and well-supported system capable of empowering your team and delighting your guests.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, FOSSE et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. FOSSE et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. FOSSE propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 2.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
FOSSE : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Marriott International a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits