The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Travel Tripper se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Travel Tripper mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Travel Tripper hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth goals. Mews is a full-suite property management system that automates and streamlines daily hotel operations, while Travel Tripper primarily focuses on booking, distribution, and revenue management aimed at maximizing direct reservations.
If your aim is to overhaul core hotel operations and improve guest experiences with a versatile, all-in-one platform, Mews is the clear frontrunner. But if your priority is enhancing your distribution channels and boosting direct bookings through sophisticated rate and availability management, Travel Tripper might seem attractive—yet, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it less reliable.
Mews and Travel Tripper serve different primary functions within hotel tech stacks. Mews offers a comprehensive cloud-based property management system with over 750 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.62/5, and recent reviews from the last six months—indicating ongoing support and development. Conversely, Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, suggesting little current market presence or user engagement.
Both products aim to optimize hotel performance, but Mews covers from booking to check-out, including guest management, housekeeping, billing, and integrations. Travel Tripper, meanwhile, concentrates on distribution and revenue management, helping hotels direct traffic and control rates but lacks core PMS functionalities.
Would you prefer a unified platform that manages your hotel end-to-end, or a specialized tool that maximizes your booking channels? Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings strongly suggest it’s the more trustworthy choice for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel needs a central system that automates guest check-ins, improves operational efficiency, and offers a broad suite of features—like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, and extensive integrations—then Mews is the clear pick. Its user-friendly interface, high customer satisfaction, and robust automation make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains seeking operational agility.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s primary goal is to optimize distribution, rate management, and reduce reliance on OTAs to increase direct bookings, Travel Tripper’s platform could be appealing. It specializes in channel management, advanced revenue management, and offers tools for rate and availability control, though it lacks the comprehensive PMS features found in Mews.
For most hotels seeking a full operational platform with proven reviews and ongoing support, Mews’s broad feature set and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice.
Mews’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, streamlined onboarding, and mobile app capabilities. Many users highlight how staff can quickly adapt, often in just days, thanks to clear workflows and proactive support.
Travel Tripper, lacking recent reviews and detailed user feedback, does not offer comparable insights into usability. Its minimal online presence suggests it may not prioritize user experience or ongoing customer support, which are critical factors for hotel teams.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers over 59 features exclusive to its platform—including multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated payment processing, and mobile housekeeping. It also supports digital registration, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and centralized role management.
Travel Tripper’s core focus appears to be on booking and distribution, with no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities available publicly. Its specialization in rate control, channel management, and revenue optimization is valuable but does not replace the comprehensive operational tools in Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews has a strong support reputation, rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews emphasizing responsive, proactive assistance and effective onboarding. Customers note that support can resolve issues quickly, and the company frequently updates its platform based on user feedback.
Travel Tripper’s support ratings and recent user feedback are unavailable, making it difficult to assess their responsiveness. Given the lack of recent reviews, confidence in ongoing support and product evolution favors Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews connects to over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, point-of-sale systems, payment providers, and other hotel tech solutions. Its open API and extensive marketplace facilitate tailored integrations to meet diverse operational needs.
Travel Tripper currently has no verified partners, limiting its ability to integrate with other systems. This significantly reduces flexibility for hotels looking to build a connected, automated tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s review count of 758, with 98 recent reviews, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—independent, boutique, city center, hostels—rate it highly, with an average rating of 4.64/5 among reviews, mainly praising its usability and automation.
Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of feedback over time raises questions about its continued relevance or support.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s pricing starts at a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options. This flat rate covers core PMS functionalities, with additional costs potentially arising from integrations or add-ons.
Travel Tripper’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there is no information on trial or subscription models. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare value directly, but the available data favors Mews’s clear pricing structure.
Mews is a comprehensive cloud-based PMS that covers your entire hotel operation, from reservations to housekeeping, with a proven track record and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design make it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, especially those seeking operational efficiency and a future-proof tech stack.
Travel Tripper specializes in distribution and revenue management, focusing on boosting direct bookings and controlling rates across channels. However, the lack of recent reviews and a limited feature set make it less reliable for hotels needing an all-encompassing management platform.
For most hotels, especially those wanting a trusted, well-reviewed solution with ongoing support and extensive features, Mews is the clear choice. If your core goal is to optimize your distribution channels and you’re comfortable with niche tools, Travel Tripper may be worth exploring, but the current data favors Mews.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Travel Tripper | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Travel Tripper partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Travel Tripper partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Travel Tripper en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Travel Tripper : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Travel Tripper a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits