The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
ZHARA se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de ZHARA mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational success and guest satisfaction. While both Mews PMS and ZHARA aim to streamline operations and boost profitability, they serve different needs—Mews is a full-scale hospitality platform, whereas ZHARA concentrates on revenue management and pricing strategies. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a comprehensive PMS solution or an advanced revenue optimization tool. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Mews PMS and ZHARA tackle distinct challenges. Mews offers an all-in-one cloud-based platform that handles reservations, guest communications, housekeeping, integrations, and reporting, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency. ZHARA, on the other hand, specializes in revenue management by providing AI-driven pricing insights to maximize profitability. Where do your hotel’s pain points lie—day-to-day operations or revenue maximization?
Mews’s recent review data shows a high overall rating of 4.62 out of 5 based on 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, underscoring its current popularity. Conversely, ZHARA’s lack of reviews and ratings suggests less recent user feedback, making Mews’s user base the stronger, more reliable choice today. Do you want a proven, actively supported system or a niche revenue tool?
If your hotel needs an integrated platform that manages reservations, front desk tasks, guest communications, housekeeping, and third-party integrations, go with Mews. It’s best for hotels that want to automate daily operations, improve guest experiences, and scale easily, especially in segments like boutique, city center, or hostel accommodations.
If your primary focus is optimizing revenue and pricing strategies through advanced analytics and AI-driven recommendations, ZHARA might be suitable—though its limited feedback indicates it is less suited for comprehensive hotel management. For hotels seeking operational control and guest service, Mews remains the superior choice.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s user interface garners a 4.7 out of 5 rating, with reviews praising its modern, intuitive design and straightforward setup. Its onboarding process averages 4.39 out of 5, with many users highlighting quick implementation and minimal training, supported by strong customer feedback like: “Mews is very user-friendly and makes everything much easier.” Support for staff adoption is well-rated, with many noting prompt assistance.
ZHARA, lacking publicly available ratings or recent reviews, offers no comparable data on ease of use. Based on the absence of feedback, it’s safe to assume Mews currently provides a more accessible, user-friendly experience. Edge: Mews
Mews boasts 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated POS, mobile app, and extensive reporting tools. These functionalities enable comprehensive management of front desk, housekeeping, revenue, and guest engagement.
ZHARA’s feature set appears limited to revenue management and analytics, with no distinct features listed beyond AI-driven reviews and recommendations. It lacks the broad operational tools that make Mews a versatile PMS. For your hotel’s daily management needs, Mews clearly offers more actionable capabilities.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s support and onboarding ratings average 4.27 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users highlight prompt resolution of issues and a dedicated support team, often describing Mews as “supportive and proactive,” especially during implementation.
ZHARA provides no publicly available support ratings or recent feedback, making it impossible to assess service quality. Given Mews’s established reputation and recent review activity, it’s the safer choice for reliable support. Edge: Mews
Mews offers a verified network of 336 integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and many more—making it highly adaptable to various operational tools. Its extensive API and marketplace enable customization and seamless connectivity tailored to your hotel’s needs.
ZHARA’s integration count is zero, indicating it functions more as a standalone revenue tool without broad connectivity options. For a hotel that relies on multiple systems, Mews’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s reviews reflect a 4.64/5 rating from 679 hotel-specific evaluations, with notable praise from boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hotels in segments like city center and boutique consistently rate it highly, with recent reviews emphasizing usability, automation, and support.
ZHARA has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the robust, recent feedback for Mews, it’s clear hoteliers prefer and trust it more.
Edge: Mews
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no free trial, freemium tier, or clear pricing for additional features. Its pricing model suggests a premium, enterprise-level platform suitable for hotels with larger budgets seeking a full-service PMS.
ZHARA’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, and no trial information is available, indicating a lack of transparency. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking clear cost expectations, Mews’s transparent pricing provides peace of mind.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews
Not ideal if:
Edge: ZHARA (for revenue-focused tasks)
Mews PMS and ZHARA serve different core functions, with Mews providing a comprehensive hotel management platform and ZHARA specializing in revenue optimization. For most hotels seeking operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set, recent reviews, and active support make it the clear leader.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS that automates daily operations and integrates with your existing tech stack. ZHARA may be suitable if your primary focus is maximizing revenue through AI-powered pricing insights and you already have operational systems in place.
If you prioritize a proven, user-friendly platform with broad capabilities, Mews is the definitive choice. For niche revenue management without operational management, consider ZHARA—but be aware of its limited feedback and integration options.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
ZHARA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et ZHARA partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et ZHARA partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ZHARA en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. ZHARA : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 99 et ZHARA a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits