The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
ZHARA se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de ZHARA mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and increasing revenue. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and ZHARA by ZHARA both target this goal but approach it differently. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a large user base and active recent reviews, whereas ZHARA appears more focused on revenue management, with fewer reviews and no recent user feedback. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s needs for features versus revenue insights.
Are you prioritizing a proven, well-supported PMS with extensive features, or are you looking for a specialized revenue management solution? Let’s compare these two platforms across key hotel operation aspects.
HotelTime PMS is a full-featured, cloud-based system designed to cover every aspect of hotel management, from reservations to spa and wellness modules. ZHARA specializes in revenue management, offering AI-driven insights and market trend analytics, but it lacks the broad operational tools HotelTime provides. HotelTime’s 433 reviews, with a recent 27 in the last six months, and a high 4.83/5 rating make it the more tested and trusted choice.
HotelTime emphasizes operational efficiency, real-time data access, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. ZHARA’s focus on analytics makes it more appropriate for revenue-focused teams that want data-driven pricing strategies. Which of these priorities better aligns with your hotel’s goals?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management system that handles reservations, POS, guest profiles, and housekeeping, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its broad feature set—over 51 unique features—supports day-to-day operations for properties of all sizes, including resorts and groups.
If your primary goal is maximizing revenue through advanced pricing strategies and market trend analysis, ZHARA’s AI-driven insights could be more beneficial. However, with no recent reviews or customer feedback, ZHARA’s practical usability remains uncertain. For most hotels, especially those seeking an all-in-one platform, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer pick.
HotelTime boasts a high ease-of-use rating (4.66/5) backed by over 400 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Its user-friendly design simplifies staff training and daily operations, although some report initial complexity in setting up modules.
ZHARA provides a streamlined, data-focused interface tailored for revenue management, but with no recent reviews, its actual usability remains unverified. Without direct user feedback, it’s difficult to assess ease of adoption or staff training.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s 51 features include integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, mobile check-in, housekeeping modules, group functionality, online support, and revenue management tools. It also offers specialized modules like spa & wellness, gift vouchers, and real-time status updates—features critical for operational control.
ZHARA specializes in AI-powered revenue insights and market trend analytics but lacks the broad operational features HotelTime offers. Given the extensive feature set of HotelTime, it clearly has the edge for full hotel management needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support scores (4.73/5) and over 430 reviews indicate strong, responsive customer service. Hospitality clients consistently mention quick response times, helpful onboarding, and ongoing support, which are vital for smooth operations.
ZHARA, with no recent reviews or customer feedback, leaves its support quality unverified. A proven support team is crucial when deploying new systems, making HotelTime the more reliable choice here.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including payment gateways, channel managers, and third-party services like Profitroom and STR. These integrations support seamless data flow and operational flexibility across multiple systems.
ZHARA has no listed integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For a hotel seeking a flexible, interconnected platform, HotelTime’s extensive integration options are a clear advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews underscores its widespread hotel industry acceptance. Its top segment ratings include a 4.82/5 for general properties and a 4.9/5 for brand hotels, especially appreciated for usability, support, and feature depth.
ZHARA lacks recent reviews, user ratings, or detailed feedback, so its real-world performance cannot be assessed. HotelTime’s high, recent review volume makes it the clear leader in customer satisfaction.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees listed. ZHARA’s pricing is not provided, making direct comparison impossible.
Given the transparent pricing for HotelTime and its extensive feature set, it offers a tangible value proposition. The lack of pricing info from ZHARA makes its cost-benefit analysis difficult, but HotelTime’s known costs and proven returns favor it for most hotels.
HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME is a comprehensive, well-supported platform with a proven track record, suitable for a broad range of hotel types. Its extensive feature set, integrations, recent high review scores, and active customer feedback make it the better choice for most hoteliers.
ZHARA concentrates on revenue management with AI-powered insights, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and integrations limits its appeal for general hotel operations. If your focus is on optimizing pricing strategies and you already have operational systems in place, ZHARA could be a fit—but for most properties, HotelTime offers more value and reliability.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s large user base and recent positive reviews establish it as the more trustworthy and versatile PMS. Its broad capabilities support your team in running an efficient, guest-focused hotel, making it the recommended choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
ZHARA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et ZHARA partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et ZHARA partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ZHARA en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. ZHARA : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 91 et ZHARA a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits