The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Occupancy Plus se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Occupancy Plus mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Mews PMS and Occupancy Plus aim to streamline your operations, but they serve different needs and maturity levels. Mews, with its extensive recent reviews and high ratings, clearly dominates the market, whereas Occupancy Plus offers a different approach, primarily focusing on AI-driven insights. Are you ready to see which suits your hotel best?
Mews PMS solves a broad range of operational challenges with a flexible, cloud-based platform. It automates reservations, billing, and guest communications, with a dedicated focus on improving efficiency and guest experience. Occupancy Plus, on the other hand, emphasizes data-driven insights using AI, helping hoteliers analyze reviews and optimize occupancy strategies.
While Mews has a proven track record across diverse hotel types—ranging from boutique to large chains—Occupancy Plus appears more suited for hotels seeking AI-powered analytics and strategic recommendations. Do you prioritize automation and user experience over data insights?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-use platform that automates daily tasks and supports a wide variety of property types, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set—like online check-in, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrations—makes it ideal for hotels seeking operational scalability and guest-centric services.
If your team is looking for a system centered on AI-generated guest sentiment analysis and occupancy insights to inform strategy, Occupancy Plus might be the better fit. However, its lack of detailed reviews and a limited global footprint suggest it’s less proven for larger or multi-property operations.
Given Mews’ large review count (758 reviews) and recent activity (98 reviews in the last 6 months), it has a distinct edge for hoteliers wanting a trusted, well-supported system.
Mews scores a high 4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hotel staff consistently report faster implementation and easier daily management, with some noting that training is minimal due to its user-friendly design.
Occupancy Plus has no publicly available user ratings, making it difficult to assess its usability. Given the limited review data, we cannot confidently say it matches Mews' ease, especially for staff adoption and onboarding. Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews boasts over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, booking engine, online check-in, mobile app, integrated payments, automation tools, and a robust channel manager. It also offers a wide array of integrations—over 336 verified partners—that support diverse operational needs.
Occupancy Plus, with no specific feature list, emphasizes AI review summaries and occupancy recommendations. While useful, it lacks the operational tools—like housekeeping, revenue management, or guest communication—that are central to daily hotel management. Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5, with many users commenting on responsive and helpful customer service. Recent reviews highlight the support team’s promptness in resolving bugs and assisting during onboarding, which is crucial for smooth implementation.
Occupancy Plus has no available support ratings or recent reviews. Without concrete feedback, it’s difficult to compare, but the absence of recent customer support data puts Mews ahead. Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and extensive marketplace support extensive customization and operational connections.
Occupancy Plus offers no publicly listed integrations or partner data, which limits its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels relying on diverse third-party tools, Mews’ ecosystem is a clear advantage. Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’ 4.62/5 overall rating is backed by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature richness. Hoteliers across segments, from boutique to mid-sized hotels, consistently recommend Mews, especially for its modern interface and automation.
Occupancy Plus has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on the data, Mews clearly has the superior reputation among hoteliers. Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options listed, suggesting a straightforward subscription model. Pricing for Occupancy Plus is not publicly available, making cost comparison impossible.
If budget transparency is critical, Mews provides clear pricing, whereas Occupancy Plus’s lack of information makes it difficult for decision-makers to assess ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a highly specialized niche that demands custom AI analysis or advanced data insights, and you're comfortable with less proven platforms.
Not ideal if your team needs comprehensive operational tools, broad integrations, or proven support infrastructure.
Mews stands out as the more established, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, high satisfaction ratings, and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem of integrations and ease of use make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains.
Choose Mews if you want a reliable, scalable platform that automates daily tasks and enhances guest experiences. It’s particularly advantageous for hotels seeking proven support, extensive functionalities, and a global presence.
Occupancy Plus offers a novel focus on AI insights and review analysis, which can benefit hotels with a strategic, data-driven approach. However, its limited reviews and lack of detailed features suggest it’s better suited for hotels experimenting with AI or with smaller portfolios, not for those needing comprehensive management tools.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing operational excellence and user trust, Mews remains the definitive choice. If your hotel is specifically seeking AI-driven insights as a core feature, and you’re comfortable with less proven support, Occupancy Plus could be a niche option—though it currently lacks the market validation Mews commands.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Occupancy Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Occupancy Plus partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Occupancy Plus partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Occupancy Plus en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Occupancy Plus : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Occupancy Plus a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits