The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 69 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Onyx CenterSource se distingue .
ROH se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (0.0/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Notes comparees basees sur 69 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 69 |
Apres analyse de 69 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Onyx CenterSource apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de ROH mettent en avant automation of payments and invoicing, interface conviviale, formation et accompagnement. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Formation et accompagnement
▾
|
|
|
+
Rapports et notifications en temps réel
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Capacités d'intégration
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | — | #3 2 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #4 13 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 21 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 25 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #2 34 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 28 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #3 4 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #2 61 avis |
| Europe | — | #3 1 avis |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly impact your operational efficiency, cash flow, and guest experience. Onyx CenterSource and ROH both aim to automate and streamline transactions, but their offerings differ dramatically. While Onyx CenterSource has limited recent reviews and a low overall rating, ROH stands out with a high review count and recent positive feedback. This stark contrast begs the question: which product truly suits your hotel’s needs?
The core difference lies in their approach—Onyx CenterSource provides a broad B2B payments platform with a focus on global hotel relationships, whereas ROH specializes in automating guest payments and invoicing with a user-friendly interface. Their capabilities reflect these focuses, making their suitability vary based on your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals.
Are you prioritizing a well-supported, highly-rated platform with recent reviews? Or are you looking for a more feature-rich, flexible solution that’s proven to deliver results? Let’s explore how these two options stack up across key areas to help you make an informed decision.
Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve different hotel segments and operational needs, though both aim to streamline payments. Onyx CenterSource, founded in 2013, boasts a global reach with over 150,000 properties and facilitates more than $2 billion in payments annually, but it has zero recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating—indicating a lack of recent user feedback and likely minimal current user satisfaction.
ROH, by contrast, has 65 reviews with a 100/100 HTR score and recent feedback from 10 reviews within the last six months. Hotels report that ROH’s ease of use and support are excellent, with a 4.97/5 customer support rating and a 4.84/5 value score, making it the more trusted and proven choice among current users.
Given these differences, your decision hinges on whether you need a broad, global payments platform (Onyx) or a highly-rated, guest payment automation system (ROH). Do your hotel’s priorities align more with sophisticated business intelligence and global relationships or with simplified, efficient payment management? The choice depends on your specific operational needs.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use platform that minimizes staff training and maximizes guest satisfaction, ROH is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, highly recent positive reviews, and features like payment splitting, pay-by-link, and recurring payments make it ideal for hotels focused on operational simplicity and guest experience.
Onyx CenterSource is better suited for large, complex hotel networks or global operations that require extensive B2B payment relationships. Its focus on commission payments and business intelligence fits hotels with extensive partner networks or those seeking detailed financial reporting, but its lack of recent reviews makes its current usability and support less certain.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, modern payments solution, ROH’s current review strength and feature set make it the more practical choice. If your hotel’s needs are primarily operational and guest-centric, ROH should be your go-to.
ROH shines with a 4.95/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews from 10 users, who describe it as "amazing" and "extremely user friendly." Multiple reviewers highlight how it simplifies finding payments and scheduling, with no questions from clients about platform use, making onboarding straightforward.
Onyx CenterSource, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use with no recent reviews, suggesting that current hotel users may find it difficult or outdated. Its limited user feedback and the absence of recent testimonials imply that staff adoption and onboarding could be a challenge.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 unique features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, acceptances of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, American Express, and Diner’s Club, as well as chargeback management and PCI compliance. These features enable flexible, modern payment options and detailed transaction management.
Onyx CenterSource provides no notable features beyond its core payment processing capabilities, which are not explicitly detailed. Given the feature-rich nature of ROH, especially in payment options and management, it clearly surpasses Onyx CenterSource in functional depth.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews rate its customer support at 4.97/5, with comments like "support staff is great" and "training is easy," reflecting high satisfaction and ease of onboarding. Its recent reviews also mention prompt support and smooth implementation.
Onyx CenterSource has a 0/5 support rating with no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests limited or outdated support experiences, which is critical for a payments platform.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality but has a total of 1 verified partner. Onyx CenterSource has two verified partners, Shiji Group and Stayntouch, but with limited details on their integration depth.
Despite Onyx’s slightly higher partner count, ROH’s integrations are more proven and recent, especially with Oracle Hospitality, a key industry player. However, neither platform has an extensive or varied integration ecosystem.
Edge: Onyx CenterSource (by a small margin).
ROH’s 65 reviews, predominantly recent, give it a near-perfect score of 100/100 and a likelihood to recommend of 99%. Hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking ease of use and strong support, rate it highly.
Onyx CenterSource has no recent reviews or ratings, reflecting a lack of current user satisfaction data. Without recent feedback, its rating is effectively unavailable, making ROH the clearly higher-rated choice.
Edge: ROH.
Onyx CenterSource does not disclose pricing details, and it does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a potentially high or customized price point. Its model likely involves bespoke quotes based on hotel size or network.
ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional costs or per-room fees. This transparent pricing makes ROH accessible for hotels of varying sizes and budgets.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Onyx, ROH’s clear and predictable model is more appealing.
Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve very different hotel operations. Onyx’s strengths lie in global B2B relationships, commission management, and business intelligence, making it suitable for large, complex hotel networks. Its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about current usability and support, however, which diminishes its appeal.
ROH, with its recent 65 reviews and high scores, offers a straightforward, user-friendly platform ideal for hotels prioritizing guest payment automation, quick onboarding, and reliable support. Its 19 features and transparent pricing make it an accessible choice for most hotels seeking a modern payments solution.
For hotels that need a proven, highly-rated payment platform with a focus on ease and support, ROH is the definitive choice. Larger, global operations with complex partner relationships should consider Onyx, but only if they can verify ongoing support and usability.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and user satisfaction are your priorities, ROH is the clear winner. Its high ratings, feature set, and support quality make it the safer, more effective choice for most hotels today.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Onyx CenterSource et ROH partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Capture partielle | ||
| Fractionnement des paiements | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Paiements récurrents | ||
| Payer par lien | ||
| Pré-autorisations |
Affichage des principales differences. 7 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH est régulièrement salué pour son interface intuitive, facile d'utilisation pour le personnel de l'hôtel comme pour les clients. La plateforme simp... ROH est régulièrement salué pour son interface intuitive, facile d'utilisation pour le personnel de l'hôtel comme pour les clients. La plateforme simplifie le processus de paiement, améliorant ainsi la fluidité des transactions et la satisfaction des utilisateurs.
Les utilisateurs apprécient la formation initiale et le soutien continu de ROH, qui contribuent à une adoption fluide du logiciel. Ceci est particuliè... Les utilisateurs apprécient la formation initiale et le soutien continu de ROH, qui contribuent à une adoption fluide du logiciel. Ceci est particulièrement utile pour intégrer les nouveaux utilisateurs ou répondre efficacement aux requêtes complexes.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Bien que ROH offre des gains de temps considérables, plusieurs utilisateurs ont suggéré des améliorations concernant l'intégration avec les systèmes h... Bien que ROH offre des gains de temps considérables, plusieurs utilisateurs ont suggéré des améliorations concernant l'intégration avec les systèmes hôteliers existants, tels que les PMS et les logiciels de vente, pour une efficacité accrue. Cela inclut une intégration potentielle avec Salesforce, Delphi et Opera.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Onyx CenterSource et ROH partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Onyx CenterSource propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ROH en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. ROH est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Onyx CenterSource : Non. ROH : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Onyx CenterSource a un HT Score de 0 et ROH a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits