The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Persefone se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Persefone mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Persefone by Persefone hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience, while Persefone offers a more traditional, all-in-one platform with a strong Italian legacy. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s current stage and future plans?
Mews is a cloud-native property management system with a high user rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. Persefone, with over 17 years in the market and more than 3,000 hotels served, is a European-based system renowned for its comprehensive suite of features and reliable support but has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings. Does your hotel prioritize innovative technology and a broad ecosystem, or do you prefer a proven, integrated package with long-term stability?
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a modern, flexible platform favored by boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels, whereas Persefone’s reputation is built on stability and a full set of features, mostly appreciated by Italian hotels. Are you seeking a cutting-edge, scalable system or a tried-and-true solution with deep local expertise?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, go with Mews. Its recent review count and ratings demonstrate active adoption and ongoing improvements, making it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize operations quickly.
If your hotel prefers a traditional, all-in-one software suite with extensive features designed for the Italian market, Persefone might suit your needs better. Its long-standing presence and integrated approach appeal to hotels that value stability and a comprehensive management tool, especially if they operate primarily in Italy or similar markets.
For fast-growing hotels seeking agility, Mews’s open API, marketplace, and rapid innovation are unmatched. Conversely, if you prioritize a fully integrated, regional solution with a history of serving thousands of hotels, Persefone’s deep feature set and support may be advantageous.
Mews boasts a user rating of 4.7/5 for ease of use across 679 reviews, with many hoteliers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and modern design. Recent feedback highlights its simple reservation dashboards, guest messaging, and remote access, supporting staff of all tech skill levels.
Persefone has not publicly shared a recent ease-of-use rating or detailed user feedback, but its long history suggests a traditional, feature-rich interface that may require more training and adaptation, especially for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems. Is your team ready for a modern, user-centric platform or better served by a familiar, all-in-one interface?
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 49 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and more. Its broad suite is designed to improve operational agility and guest engagement.
Persefone, on the other hand, consolidates all functionalities into a single web solution, but specific feature counts or unique functionalities are not publicly detailed. It likely includes core hotel management features but lacks the extensive optional modules and customization that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 recent reviews, with users often citing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding, though some report occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Its large global team offers 24/7 support, aiding in onboarding and ongoing troubleshooting.
Persefone emphasizes serious technical support, stemming from its 17-year history, but it has no recent review data to gauge current support quality. Its support is reputed to be reliable, especially within Italy, but recent user feedback is unavailable for comparison.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem surpasses 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and more, with a vibrant marketplace enabling rapid integration of third-party tools. This vast network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack with ease.
Persefone offers a fully integrated solution but has no publicly available data on third-party integrations or a marketplace. Its ecosystem is likely more closed, emphasizing stability over flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.62/5 by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and excellent support, especially among boutique and city hotels. The high review count and recency indicate a vibrant, satisfied user base.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings published publicly, limiting the ability to gauge user satisfaction today. Its longstanding reputation suggests reliability, but it lacks current data to compare.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level automation and extensive features, with no free tier or trial. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 per month, offering a more affordable but less detailed view of its pricing structure, which may include custom quotes for larger hotels.
While Mews’s higher price is justified by its advanced capabilities, Persefone’s lower cost could appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties. Do your operational needs justify the investment in Mews’s wider capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel primarily operates in Italy and prefers a traditional, locally supported system with deep regional customization.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid innovation, cloud-native features, or extensive third-party ecosystems.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, supported by a large, active user base that reviews and updates regularly. Its extensive features and marketplace make it a flexible choice for hotels aiming to innovate and scale quickly.
Persefone offers a mature, comprehensive system rooted in Italy, with a focus on stability and all-in-one management, but lacks recent public reviews or a visible ecosystem of integrations. It’s better suited for hotels seeking a regional, stable platform rather than cutting-edge technology.
Choose Mews if your hotel values agility, automation, and a broad ecosystem, especially if you're planning to grow or modernize rapidly. Opt for Persefone if you prefer a long-established, regional solution with a focus on stability and deep feature integration, particularly within the Italian market.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Persefone partagent 10 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés |
Affichage des principales differences. 37 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Persefone partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Persefone en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Persefone : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Persefone a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits