The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
PREVIO se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de PREVIO mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Previo hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews is a proven leader with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and glowing recent reviews, while Previo offers a regional, all-in-one solution primarily focused on CEE markets. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, complexity, and future plans.
Mews’s large user base and recent user feedback demonstrate a mature, well-supported platform with a track record of streamlining operations. Previo, while comprehensive, has limited recent reviews and a narrower market focus. Does your hotel need a globally proven PMS or a regionally tailored tool?
Mews and Previo both aim to unify hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Mews excels with a cloud-native, highly customizable platform that automates tasks, enhances guest experiences, and offers over 1,000 integrations. Previo provides an all-in-one cloud system with PMS, booking engine, guest app, and payment automation, mainly targeting the CEE region.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—highlight its ease of use, extensive feature set, and superior support, making it the preferred choice for diverse hotel types. Previo’s absence of recent reviews and limited global presence suggest it may be less adaptable for hotels looking to grow or operate internationally.
Are you prioritizing a mature, extensively reviewed platform with proven scalability and integrations, or a regional system with a narrower scope?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a global footprint and a broad partner ecosystem, go with Mews. Its high user ratings (4.62/5), recent reviews, and extensive integrations make it ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains seeking automation and guest-centric features.
If you predominantly operate within the CEE region and need an integrated system that combines PMS, booking engine, and housekeeping for simplified management, Previo could meet your needs. However, with fewer recent reviews and a smaller user base, it might lack the scalability and support that modern hotels demand.
For hotels aiming to grow internationally or leverage automation, Mews offers a clear advantage. Conversely, regional operators satisfied with a local solution might find Previo sufficient—though limited review data makes this less certain.
Mews’s UI scores a 4.7/5, and recent reviews praise its modern, intuitive design that reduces onboarding time and staff training. Clients report that staff can log in remotely, and the platform’s simplicity enables quick adoption, often within days—"Mews is very user-friendly and makes everything much easier," says one recent reviewer.
Previo’s usability details are scarce, but no recent reviews or user feedback are available to gauge its ease of use. Given Mews’s high ratings and active support, it’s safe to say Mews offers a more user-friendly experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 31 shared features plus 28 exclusive to it, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, automated night audit, real-time reporting, and a guest app. Its platform is designed for versatility, automation, and guest engagement, supported by a robust API and extensive third-party integrations.
Previo’s feature set includes PMS, booking engine, channel management, guest app, payment automation, and housekeeping—covering essential operations but with less detail on advanced or automation-focused features. It lacks the breadth of integrations and customization options found in Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Comments include “The support team sets new standards,” and “Mews support has improved significantly,” reflecting solid, ongoing support.
Previo’s support metrics and reviews are unavailable, making it hard to judge. Given Mews’s well-established support reputation and recent positive feedback, it leads in this category.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major brands like HQ Revenue, OpenTable, and Onity, with over 1,000 integrations accessible via its Marketplace. This ecosystem allows easy connection of revenue tools, channel managers, POS, and more, supporting complex, multi-property operations.
Previo has just 7 verified partners, with only 6 shared with Mews, indicating a limited integration ecosystem. For hotels needing extensive connectivity, Mews’s ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—produce an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties rate it highly, with reviews emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support.
Previo lacks recent review data, making it impossible to gauge current customer satisfaction. Mews’s recent high ratings and active user feedback position it as the more trusted choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month with no implementation or trial fees, reflecting a predictable, subscription-based model suitable for hotels of various sizes. Pricing details for Previo are not publicly available, but it is generally marketed as an all-in-one cloud system in Central and Eastern Europe.
While Previo’s cost structure remains unclear, Mews’s transparent pricing allows for easier budgeting and assessment of ROI—crucial for decision-making.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich, and highly rated PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Its extensive integrations, automation capabilities, and recent reviews demonstrate a proven ability to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
Choose Mews if you need a flexible, scalable platform with a global footprint, extensive support, and a large partner ecosystem. Its latest reviews reinforce its dominance for hotels seeking efficiency, growth, and innovation.
Previo may suit regional hotels in CEE seeking a simple, integrated system, but limited recent feedback and fewer integrations suggest it’s less suited for hotels with growth ambitions or complex operations.
For most modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and future-proofing, Mews remains the stronger choice—definitively.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Previo partagent 31 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 16 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Previo partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Previo en propose 7. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Previo : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 99 et PREVIO a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits