RoomRaccoon PMS vs. Soraso:
Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both RoomRaccoon and Smart Finder aim to streamline your workflows, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on the scale of your hotel, your integration needs, and the level of support you expect.

RoomRaccoon, with its extensive review base, recent positive feedback, and broad feature set, clearly stands as the more established and reliable option. Smart Finder, lacking reviews and market presence, offers little evidence of robustness or customer satisfaction. Is your hotel ready for a proven, feature-rich PMS?

Is RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder Better for Hotels?

RoomRaccoon, established in 2017, is a comprehensive cloud-based PMS designed primarily for small to medium-sized independent hotels. It offers an integrated platform combining a channel manager, booking engine, and revenue management tools, aiming to reduce operational complexity and boost revenue. Conversely, Smart Finder, founded in 1997, has minimal online presence, no reviews, and a limited feature set, making it difficult to assess its suitability or reliability.

While RoomRaccoon has a proven track record with over 160 verified reviews and a recent surge of five reviews in the last six months, Smart Finder's lack of reviews suggests a less tested product. Given the absence of user feedback, it's uncertain whether Smart Finder can match RoomRaccoon’s performance or support.

Are you comfortable relying on a solution with no publicly available reviews or recent customer feedback?

RoomRaccoon vs Smart Finder: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an all-in-one solution that simplifies daily operations, automates guest communications, and enhances revenue through dynamic pricing, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its extensive feature suite—including channel management, booking engine, payments, and guest CRM—tailors well to independent hotels seeking efficiency and growth.

On the other hand, if your hotel requires a minimal or niche system with limited or unspecified features, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited support and uncertain performance, Smart Finder might seem appealing. However, without substantial reviews or proven functionality, it's safer to prioritize a platform with track record and proven success, such as RoomRaccoon.

In summary, for hotels prioritizing reliability, proven capabilities, and a substantial user base, RoomRaccoon is the recommended platform.

Is RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon’s user experience is highly rated, with a 4.74/5 ease of use score based on 169 reviews, and recent feedback emphasizes its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users frequently mention that their staff find it easy to learn, with some noting that the system’s design reduces training time significantly.

Smart Finder, lacking any reviews or detailed information, offers no data on ease of use. Without user feedback, we cannot reliably assess how simple or complex it might be for your team to adopt.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder?

RoomRaccoon boasts a rich feature set with 51 unique capabilities, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and integrations with payment terminals and ID scanners. Its features cater to comprehensive hotel management and revenue optimization, with real-time reporting and multi-lingual support.

Smart Finder reportedly offers no features publicly, and no unique functionalities are documented. Without a detailed feature list or user reviews, it's impossible to compare the two on features. Based on available data, RoomRaccoon’s extensive capabilities clearly give it the edge.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Customer Support: RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder?

RoomRaccoon’s support staff receives a 4.53/5 rating from 169 reviews, with many users praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Comments from hoteliers highlight quick issue resolution and attentive onboarding, which are critical for smooth daily operations.

Smart Finder’s lack of reviews or support ratings means we cannot evaluate its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in PMS selection, RoomRaccoon’s established reputation makes it the safer choice.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has More Integrations: RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder?

RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including popular solutions like Sage, RevControl, and Paxxio, providing extensive connectivity with payment, marketing, and other hospitality tools. These integrations facilitate seamless workflows and reduce manual entry.

Smart Finder, with only 2 verified partners (including IDeaS and Hoteliers.Guru), offers far fewer integrations, limiting flexibility and operational efficiency. For most hotels, especially those seeking a connected tech stack, RoomRaccoon’s broad integration network is a significant advantage.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: RoomRaccoon or Smart Finder?

RoomRaccoon’s 169 reviews with an overall rating of 4.88/5 and recent positive feedback confirm high user satisfaction. Hoteliers consistently praise its usability, automation, and revenue tools, with a 94% likelihood to recommend and a recent 9.09/10 NPS score.

Smart Finder’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user sentiment. Without customer ratings or feedback, we must rely on proven performance, which favors RoomRaccoon.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

How Much Do RoomRaccoon and Smart Finder Cost?

RoomRaccoon charges a monthly flat fee of $1,000, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fee. Pricing appears straightforward, though it is geared toward small and medium-sized hotels with the budget for an all-in-one platform.

Pricing details for Smart Finder are unavailable, and without this information, assessing value or affordability is impossible. Given RoomRaccoon’s transparent pricing and proven value, it remains the more reliable choice.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

• Hotels that want an all-in-one PMS, channel management, and booking engine platform.
• Independent hotels and small operators seeking automation and revenue growth.
• Hotels aiming to reduce manual tasks like invoicing, guest communication, and reporting.
• Hotels that value integrations with popular payment and marketing tools.
• Teams looking for proven, user-friendly software with recent positive reviews.

Not ideal if your hotel is a large chain needing enterprise-level, highly customizable solutions or complex integrations outside of RoomRaccoon’s offerings.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Smart Finder?

• Small hotels or guesthouses willing to risk limited features and support.
• Hotels seeking a minimal or niche system without extensive integration needs.
• Teams that do not prioritize robust reviews or proven support.
• Hotels preferring a solution from a vendor with a long history but lacking public validation.
• Hotels that are comfortable working with an untested or less transparent platform.

Not ideal if you need a scalable, fully supported system with proven customer satisfaction.

RoomRaccoon vs Smart Finder: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RoomRaccoon, with its extensive features, large review base, and recent high ratings, stands out as the most reliable and comprehensive PMS for small to medium-sized hotels. Its proven track record in automating operations, increasing revenue, and supporting integrations makes it the logical choice for hoteliers seeking stability and growth.

Smart Finder, lacking reviews and detailed features, offers no evidence of performance or support quality. Without user validation, it’s a risky option for any hotel looking for a dependable PMS.

If your hotel values proven performance, a broad feature set, and strong customer support, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner. For hotels willing to accept uncertainty and minimal features, Smart Finder might be considered, but it’s not advisable given the available data.