The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Sigh Ulyses se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Sigh Ulyses mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Sigh Ulyses hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with a proven track record, hosting over 750 reviews and a high rating of 4.62/5, indicating widespread satisfaction. Sigh Ulyses, by contrast, is an AI-driven review analysis platform with no reviews or ratings to date, making it difficult to assess its reliability or effectiveness for hotel management.
Mews’s extensive features and large user base suggest it’s a more mature and trusted solution for hotels seeking an integrated management system. Sigh Ulyses might serve niche needs like review sentiment analysis but lacks the operational depth that hoteliers require. So, which product truly meets your hotel’s core management needs?
Mews and Sigh Ulyses address fundamentally different challenges. Mews is designed to streamline daily hotel operations—from reservations to billing—through automation and robust integrations, with a focus on scalability and versatility. Sigh Ulyses concentrates on analyzing guest reviews and extracting insights, primarily suited for reputation management or customer feedback analysis.
While Mews’s reviews demonstrate consistent satisfaction across various hotel segments, Sigh Ulyses has no publicly available review data, making it impossible to gauge its impact or user experience. Do you need a reliable, full-featured PMS or a review analysis tool?
If your hotel’s priority is operational efficiency, guest management, and integration flexibility, Mews is the clear choice. Its platform supports a wide range of hotel types—from boutique properties to large chains—and offers over 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, POS, and revenue tools.
On the other hand, if your focus is on understanding and responding to customer sentiment, especially through review analysis, Sigh Ulyses might seem appealing. However, with zero reviews or proven user feedback, it’s untested at scale. For hotel management, Mews is the more reliable and proven solution, while Sigh Ulyses remains a speculative option for reputation insights.
Mews’s user interface is rated 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its modern, intuitive design. Onboarding is rated 4.39/5, and staff adoption is generally smooth, supported by extensive training resources and a cloud-based approach that allows remote access.
Sigh Ulyses scores no publicly available ratings, reviews, or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or learning curve. Without concrete data, it’s safe to say Mews’s usability is well-established and trusted by hundreds of hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, online check-in, real-time reporting, automated reminders, and integrated payment processing. Its cloud-based system is PCI and GDPR compliant, with advanced tools for automating operational tasks and enhancing guest experiences.
Sigh Ulyses has no publicly listed features or comparable functionalities. It primarily provides AI-driven review summaries and actionable recommendations, but lacks the operational tools necessary for daily hotel management. Clearly, Mews’s feature set is far more suited for managing a hotel.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with many reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Its support team offers online, 24/7 assistance, and users appreciate the dedicated onboarding process, though some note occasional bugs that are promptly addressed.
Sigh Ulyses has no available support ratings or customer feedback. Given its minimal user base and lack of reviews, it’s impossible to gauge the quality or responsiveness of its support. For reliable assistance, Mews is the evident leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest engagement platforms. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable hotels to customize their tech ecosystem efficiently.
Sigh Ulyses has no verified integrations or partnerships publicly listed. It appears to be a standalone review analysis tool without direct operational integrations. For a hotel managing multiple systems, Mews’s integration ecosystem is significantly more advantageous.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.62/5 rating based on 758 reviews, including 98 in the last six months. Hotels across segments—from boutique and city center hotels to hostels and resorts—highlight its ease of use, automation, and support.
Sigh Ulyses has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Mews’s reviews, it’s clear that hoteliers favor Mews for operational management.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options available. Its cost reflects its extensive features and enterprise-grade integrations.
Sigh Ulyses does not provide publicly available pricing details or subscription models. Its lack of transparent pricing makes it hard to compare directly, but the absence of a proven track record suggests it may be more suited for specific, niche applications rather than full hotel management.
Mews offers a full-stack PMS with proven functionality, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking to modernize operations. Its broad feature set, support, and market presence make it a safe, scalable choice for most hoteliers.
Sigh Ulyses, by contrast, appears narrowly focused on review analysis with no operational tools or proven hotel management capabilities. Its lack of reviews or user feedback suggests it’s untested at scale and unlikely to replace or complement a PMS for day-to-day hotel operations.
If you need an operational backbone that enhances efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue, Mews is the clear choice. For specialized reputation insights, consider Sigh Ulyses, but only as a supplementary tool—never as a primary management system.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Sigh Ulyses partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Sigh Ulyses partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sigh Ulyses en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Sigh Ulyses : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Sigh Ulyses a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits