The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
2C2P shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, 2C2P users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| 2C2P |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel hinges on several factors: ease of use, feature set, customer support, and overall value. While 2C2P and Zil Money both aim to streamline your payment operations, their approaches and market presence differ sharply. 2C2P offers a broader geographic reach but has no recent reviews or user ratings, whereas Zil Money has accumulated over 50 recent reviews, with high ratings across categories. With more recent feedback and a higher review count, Zil Money emerges as the more reliable choice.
In evaluating which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs, consider their core strengths and limitations. 2C2P’s limited feature set and lack of recent reviews make it a less viable option, especially for properties seeking quick, reliable payment solutions. Zil Money, on the other hand, with its extensive features and positive recent reviews, offers a compelling package. But does it fit your hotel’s specific requirements? Let’s compare.
Both 2C2P and Zil Money handle hotel payment processing but diverge significantly in market presence and feature depth. 2C2P’s minimal recent user feedback—no reviews in the last six months—makes it difficult to gauge current performance or customer satisfaction. Conversely, Zil Money has over 50 reviews from recent months and an 87% likelihood to recommend, suggesting ongoing engagement and trust among users.
While 2C2P claims to serve the hotel industry, it lacks recent validation through reviews or functional updates, raising questions about its current reliability. Zil Money, however, is recognized for its user-friendly platform, multiple payment options, and strong support ratings. Do you want a solution backed by current, positive user feedback? Or are you comfortable with an unreviewed, uncertain product?
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use payment platform with multiple payment methods and recent positive reviews, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its 4.5-star ease of use and support ratings, along with over 50 recent reviews, demonstrate its ongoing reliability. For properties prioritizing comprehensive features like pay-by-link, recurring payments, contactless options, and multi-currency settlements, Zil Money offers these in abundance.
In contrast, 2C2P’s zero reviews and limited feature offerings—only basic payment processing without integration or advanced tools—make it unsuitable for hotels seeking modernization or expansion. If your hotel values proven user satisfaction and feature depth, Zil Money is the superior solution.
Zil Money’s user interface earns a 4.5/5 rating from recent reviewers, praised for its intuitiveness and straightforward navigation. Hotels report quick onboarding—rated 4.16/5—meaning your team can start processing payments with minimal training. Customer support also scores highly, with a 4.5/5 rating, and reviewers note prompt, helpful assistance.
2C2P, by contrast, has no recent reviews or ratings, and its usability remains unverified. Its lack of recent feedback suggests that if it was ever user-friendly, it may no longer be maintained or optimized. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 distinct features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, contactless options, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, and multi-currency settlements. Its feature set addresses modern hotel payment needs, simplifying diverse transaction types. 2C2P, however, provides no features beyond basic payment processing, indicating a limited toolset incapable of supporting complex or varied payment scenarios.
Given the feature disparity—Zil Money’s 15 features versus 2C2P’s none—Zil Money clearly has the upper hand for hotels seeking versatility and sophistication. Edge: Zil Money.
With a recent support rating of 4.5/5, Zil Money’s users frequently mention fast, helpful responses and solid onboarding assistance. Many reviews highlight their satisfaction with customer service, which adds confidence to adoption and ongoing use.
2C2P lacks recent reviews altogether, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its support experience remains unverified, which is a risk for hotels relying on prompt help. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s integration landscape includes partnerships with major financial institutions and accounting software, although it has no verified third-party integrations outside its own ecosystem. It provides API access, facilitating custom integrations, but with limited pre-built options.
2C2P offers only one verified partner—Yanolja Cloud Solution—limiting its compatibility with other platforms. For hotels needing flexible, multiple integrations, Zil Money’s API and broader connectivity options make it more adaptable. Edge: Zil Money.
With zero reviews and ratings from hoteliers for 2C2P, there’s no recent feedback to gauge user satisfaction. Meanwhile, Zil Money has over 50 reviews, with an average rating of 62.92 out of 100, and an 87% likelihood to recommend, primarily from property managers across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Property types, from boutique hotels to casinos, rate Zil Money highly, citing ease of use, reliability, and feature richness. No recent hotel reviews exist for 2C2P, making Zil Money the clear favorite in terms of user satisfaction. Edge: Zil Money.
2C2P’s pricing model is not publicly disclosed, with no mention of trial periods or monthly fees, which complicates budgeting and comparison. Conversely, Zil Money charges a $400 base price, with no monthly fees or implementation costs, providing clarity upfront.
The transparent pricing of Zil Money allows hotels to evaluate ROI easily, while 2C2P’s undefined costs present a risk of hidden fees or unexpected charges. For hotels prioritizing budget predictability, Zil Money’s straightforward pricing is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
In essence, 2C2P is a minimal, regional payment processor with no recent user validation, making it unsuitable for hotels seeking reliability and modern features. Zil Money, with its extensive recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and rich feature set, is the clear choice for hotels looking to improve payment flexibility, ease of use, and support.
If your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and strong support, Zil Money should be your go-to. Conversely, only consider 2C2P if you operate in specific regions with limited transaction needs and accept the risk of unverified current support.
In conclusion, Zil Money’s recent, positive feedback and feature depth make it the recommended solution for most hotels today. It offers the speed, flexibility, and reliability your team needs to process payments confidently and efficiently.
According to HTR's product database, 2C2P and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. 2C2P and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. 2C2P offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
2C2P: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. 2C2P has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor