The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 31 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ziosk shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Sales Reporting and Employee Reporting and Management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 31 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 31 |
After analyzing 31 verified reviews, Ziosk users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight user-friendliness, operational efficiency, integration of systems. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendliness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration of Systems
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Localization Needs
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel POS Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #7 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 14 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #6 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 10 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 22 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #6 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 6 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #4 6 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #3 7 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel POS system is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and maximizing revenue. Ziosk Tablets by Ziosk and Shiji Infrasys POS serve this purpose but target different hotel segments and operational needs. Ziosk is primarily designed for casual dining venues within hotels, offering guest-controlled tablets, while Shiji’s Infrasys is an enterprise-level, cloud-based POS suited for large hotels managing multiple outlets. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s complexity and operational scope?
Ziosk Tablets are built for casual dining environments, offering a 7-inch Android touchscreen that guests interact with directly at each table. Shiji Infrasys, on the other hand, is an enterprise-grade, cloud-based POS that integrates with property management systems and supports multi-outlet, multi-property management. Both aim to improve F&B operations, but their core functionalities and target markets differ significantly. Given Ziosk's focus on table-side engagement and entertainment, is your hotel primarily a casual dining venue or a full-service hotel with complex F&B needs?
The main divergence lies in their scope: Ziosk provides a self-service, entertainment, and payment solution for individual tables, whereas Shiji offers a comprehensive platform for managing multiple F&B outlets, inventories, reports, and guest profiles across properties. Are you seeking a guest-facing entertainment device or a centralized system to oversee entire food and beverage operations? This fundamental difference should guide your decision.
If your hotel operates primarily as a casual dining restaurant, especially within a hotel or resort setting, Ziosk’s tablets may serve your needs better due to their guest interaction capabilities and entertainment features. Conversely, if your hotel requires a robust, enterprise-level POS that manages multiple outlets, inventory, employee management, and detailed reporting, Shiji Infrasys is the clear choice.
Hoteliers managing high-volume, multi-property operations will benefit from Shiji’s extensive features and integrations, while those focused on enhancing guest engagement at the table will find Ziosk’s solution more aligned. Your decision hinges on whether your priority is guest entertainment and simple order-taking or comprehensive F&B management.
Ziosk’s interface is designed for casual dining guests, with simple, familiar touchscreen controls—though it’s primarily aimed at guests rather than staff, so staff usability isn’t a focus. Shiji Infrasys scores high with a 4.66/5 in ease of use, thanks to its intuitive interface, onboarding support, and streamlined operations for staff. Reviews highlight that Shiji’s system is user-friendly for hotel staff, reducing training time and operational errors.
Given the complexity of an enterprise POS, Shiji’s system is more suited for staff training and daily use. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Ziosk offers features tailored to casual dining, such as entertainment, guest ordering, and pay-at-the-table functionality—these are unique to its platform. In contrast, Shiji provides 23 features including cloud-based management, sales and inventory reporting, customer management, mobile ordering, digital menus, integrated kitchen displays, and PCI compliance—features that support large, multi-outlet hotel operations.
Shiji’s feature set significantly surpasses Ziosk’s, with its ability to unify multiple hospitality functions and provide detailed insights. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Ziosk’s reviews do not provide detailed support ratings, whereas Shiji scores a 4.52/5 for customer support, with comments praising prompt, helpful, and professional assistance. Shiji’s extensive global support network and dedicated onboarding services are frequently highlighted, whereas Ziosk lacks recent reviews to gauge support quality.
For hotel operators relying on ongoing support and system reliability, Shiji’s support infrastructure offers reassurance. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Ziosk has no verified integration partners, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. Shiji boasts 64 verified integrations, including major platforms like Bookboost, SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, IDeaS, Duetto, Amadeus, and property management systems.
This extensive integration ecosystem allows hotels to create a unified tech stack, automate processes, and access comprehensive data. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Ziosk has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current hotel satisfaction. Shiji, with 29 reviews and a NPS score of 9.03/5, is rated highly across hotel segments, especially by large and branded hotels. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, indicating strong satisfaction among users.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Shiji’s ratings reflect a more reliable gauge of hotel satisfaction. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Ziosk does not publish pricing details, but as a tablet-based solution, it likely involves hardware costs and potentially per-unit or licensing fees. Shiji’s Infrasys starts at $600 and does not specify ongoing fees, but this one-time fee covers core functionality, with optional add-ons or integrations potentially incurring additional costs.
Pricing transparency favors Shiji, giving hotels a clearer understanding of investment. However, actual costs depend on your hotel’s scale and desired features.
Hotels with casual dining venues or restaurants aiming to enhance guest engagement through entertainment and self-service should consider Ziosk. It's ideal for outlets prioritizing guest control over food ordering, entertainment, and payment at individual tables.
Not ideal if your hotel requires integrated management of multiple outlets, detailed reporting, or enterprise-level features. Also, it’s less suited for hotels with complex operations or multiple property management needs.
Shiji’s POS suits large hotels, resorts, and properties with multiple F&B outlets demanding centralized control, detailed reporting, and integrations with other hotel systems. Hotels aiming for operational efficiency, data-driven decision-making, and scalable growth will find this platform valuable.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique or only needs a simple, standalone POS for a single restaurant. For minimal operations, a simpler system might suffice, and the cost/complexity of Shiji may be unnecessary.
The core difference is scale: Ziosk is a guest-facing entertainment and ordering tablet for casual dining, while Shiji offers a comprehensive, enterprise-grade POS for complex hotel operations. If your hotel’s F&B outlets are straightforward and guest engagement is a priority, Ziosk provides a cost-effective, easy-to-deploy solution.
Choose Shiji if your hotel operates multiple outlets, needs detailed management features, and values system integrations, reporting, and support. Its extensive feature set and proven hotel use cases make it a more versatile choice for large, multi-property hotels.
For hotels focused on enhancing the guest experience at the table with entertainment and self-service, Ziosk is an attractive option. But for broader operational needs, Shiji’s platform is clearly superior.
In summary, if your hotel requires a scalable, integrated POS system with robust support and features, Shiji Infrasys stands out as the superior choice. For smaller, restaurant-specific environments seeking to elevate guest interaction at the table, Ziosk tablets may suffice. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and strategic priorities.
Hotel POS Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Ziosk Tablets and Shiji Infrasys POS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Cloud Based | ||
| Customer Management | ||
| Employee Reporting and Management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Menu Performance Reporting | ||
| Sales Reporting |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Customers find Shiji's POS and PMS systems user-friendly, reducing training time and easing new users. The intuitive interface makes it popular among... Customers find Shiji's POS and PMS systems user-friendly, reducing training time and easing new users. The intuitive interface makes it popular among staff for managing various tasks smoothly.
Shiji is applauded for its features like menu and table management, which streamline order-taking and reduce errors, ultimately enhancing daily operat... Shiji is applauded for its features like menu and table management, which streamline order-taking and reduce errors, ultimately enhancing daily operations. The system is noted for improving team efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Reviewers praise Shiji for its smooth integration of POS and PMS systems, which simplifies operations by linking various functions such as accounting,... Reviewers praise Shiji for its smooth integration of POS and PMS systems, which simplifies operations by linking various functions such as accounting, reservations, and inventory. This integration aids in accurate data tracking and boosts operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
While many appreciate the system, some report lag and slow performance during peak usage, suggesting a need for optimization. This affects tasks like... While many appreciate the system, some report lag and slow performance during peak usage, suggesting a need for optimization. This affects tasks like checkout processes and impacts overall satisfaction.
Shiji is recognized for its robust reporting capabilities, allowing hotels to pull detailed reports that aid in decision-making. However, some desire... Shiji is recognized for its robust reporting capabilities, allowing hotels to pull detailed reports that aid in decision-making. However, some desire more customization options for deeper analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ziosk Tablets and Shiji Infrasys POS share many core Hotel POS Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ziosk Tablets offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Infrasys POS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Infrasys POS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ziosk Tablets: No. Shiji Infrasys POS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel POS Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ziosk has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 79. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor