The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
A-Trust shines .
Blastness shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization and Market Insights Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, A-Trust users most value its , while Blastness users highlight customer support, revenue management efficiency, user interface and usability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| A-Trust |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct Bookings Boost
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration and Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 42 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #10 40 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 48 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 24 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #20 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #21 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 99 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #15 1 reviews |
Choosing between A-Trust by A-Trust and Blastness Revenue Management System can significantly impact your hotel’s revenue strategy. Both systems aim to streamline pricing, distribution, and forecasting, but they differ markedly in support, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and technological needs.
A-Trust is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, whereas Blastness has a solid 97 reviews from the past six months, with a 9.91/10 NPS score and 99% likelihood to recommend. Given the recent feedback and higher engagement, Blastness clearly has the edge here. Will your hotel benefit more from a proven, well-supported system?
A-Trust is an obscure player with no current reviews or visible market footprint, which makes assessing its reliability difficult. Conversely, Blastness boasts a highly rated platform with over 97 recent reviews, showing consistent user satisfaction and a focus on revenue optimization.
Blastness's extensive set of features—40 unique tools including real-time price optimization, AI-powered suggestions, and comprehensive dashboards—are designed for hotels seeking detailed control. A-Trust’s absence of features and reviews leaves its value proposition uncertain. Are you willing to risk limited support and unknown capabilities, or do you prefer a platform with proven results?
If your hotel needs a sophisticated, multi-featured RMS with strong integration and proven support, Blastness is the clear pick. Its key audience includes boutique, city-center, and resort hotels aiming for data-driven revenue growth and direct bookings.
A-Trust's limited and unverified profile suggests it may be suitable only for very small, simple properties or those seeking an unknown solution without recent customer feedback. If you prioritize stability, proven technology, and integrations—blastness’s robust ecosystem is unmatched. Do you want a system with recent reviews and a track record of user satisfaction?
Blastness scores 4.96/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and strong support. Customers highlight its user-friendly design and efficient support staff, making it accessible even for teams without technical backgrounds.
A-Trust has no available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Its lack of recent feedback suggests it may not be actively supported or as user-friendly. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 40 exclusive features such as real-time pricing, AI-driven recommendations, market intelligence, and automation tools—features that are absent in A-Trust’s profile. These tools support dynamic, data-driven decision-making with advanced dashboards and forecasting options.
A-Trust provides no distinct features or differentiators, leaving its capabilities undefined. For hotels seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich solution, Blastness’s extensive suite clearly stands out. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s support ratings are near perfect—4.92/5—based on recent reviews emphasizing quick, professional, and ongoing technical assistance. Customers frequently describe their support as responsive and critical to their success.
A-Trust offers no support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. Without recent support data, Blastness’s high ratings make it the safer, more reliable option. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness integrates with 15 verified partners, including major PMS, BI, and CRM systems, enabling streamlined workflows. Its ecosystem includes integrations with Oracle Hospitality, hotelcube, Vertical Booking, and others, facilitating multi-system compatibility.
A-Trust has no verified integrations listed, suggesting limited or no connectivity with other hotel systems. For hotels requiring extensive, reliable integrations, Blastness’s partnership network offers a distinct advantage. Edge: Blastness.
Given A-Trust has no reviews or recent feedback, it cannot be rated or compared. Conversely, Blastness’s high ratings—4.96/5 for ease of use and 4.92/5 for support—are based on recent reviews from a diverse user base, including boutique and city-center hotels.
Hotels in segments like luxury and boutique properties tend to rate Blastness higher due to its sophisticated features and support. Without recent data for A-Trust, Blastness is the clearly favored choice. Edge: Blastness.
Both products report no available pricing information. This common absence suggests a need for direct inquiry, but Blastness’s value appears aligned with its feature set and recent reviews indicating strong ROI.
A-Trust’s unknown pricing and lack of reviews make it difficult to determine value. Meanwhile, Blastness’s high performance and support suggest it offers good value for money, especially when considering its active user base.
Given its lack of reviews and features, A-Trust is best suited for hotels with very basic needs or those interested in an unverified, potentially un-supported system.
Not ideal if your hotel is a very small property with minimal tech needs or if you prefer a lightweight, less feature-rich system.
The core difference lies in proven performance and feature depth. Blastness, with its 97 recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive capabilities, is a reliable, scalable system designed to maximize revenue and simplify operations.
Choose Blastness if you need a system that’s supported by real user feedback, offers advanced features, and integrates widely. Its recent reviews confirm its relevance and effectiveness for modern hotels.
A-Trust’s lack of positive feedback, features, and support ratings makes it an uncertain choice, best avoided unless your hotel’s needs are extremely basic and you’re prepared for limited support.
In summary, for hotels eager to adopt a trusted, well-rated, and feature-rich revenue management system, Blastness is the clear leader. It’s the option that will give your team confidence in your pricing, distribution, and revenue strategies—today and tomorrow.
According to HTR's product database, A-Trust and Blastness Revenue Management System share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Price Hierarchy Control | ||
| Enterprise Business Guidelines | ||
| Guided workflows | ||
| Open Pricing | ||
| Real-time price optimization | ||
| Set Boundaries |
Showing top differences. 28 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
What hoteliers love
Customers appreciate the professionalism and responsiveness of the support team, noting quick and efficient service. However, the demand for 24/7 supp... Customers appreciate the professionalism and responsiveness of the support team, noting quick and efficient service. However, the demand for 24/7 support, especially during weekends, is expressed, reflecting the need for consistent availability in handling emergencies and continuous hotel operations.
Blastness is praised for its effective revenue management system, with users highlighting improved forecasting, pricing strategy optimization, and syn... Blastness is praised for its effective revenue management system, with users highlighting improved forecasting, pricing strategy optimization, and synchronization across distribution channels. Its AI solutions streamline decision-making processes, aiding in maximizing revenue through precise adjustments and comprehensive analysis.
The user experience is generally positive, with an emphasis on the platform's user-friendly design and clear navigation. However, some users feel the... The user experience is generally positive, with an emphasis on the platform's user-friendly design and clear navigation. However, some users feel the interface could be more intuitive, suggesting improvements in simplification of processes and customization options to further enhance usability.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users highlight limitations in broader integrations and customization capabilities. There is feedback on the need for more extensive integration... Some users highlight limitations in broader integrations and customization capabilities. There is feedback on the need for more extensive integration options with other systems and more flexible customization features to meet the diverse needs of modern hotel management.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. A-Trust and Blastness Revenue Management System share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. A-Trust offers 0 verified integration partners, while Blastness Revenue Management System offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Revenue Management System leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
A-Trust: No. Blastness Revenue Management System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. A-Trust has an HT Score of 0 and Blastness has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor