The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 20 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AeroGuest shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like PCI Compliant and PMS Integration.
Hudini shines , with exclusive features like Lobby Kiosk.
Side-by-side ratings based on 20 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 13 | 7 |
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #15 1 reviews | #18 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 9 reviews | #19 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 1 reviews | #10 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 2 reviews | #7 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 reviews | #18 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 5 reviews | #8 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #7 5 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #16 0 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #12 0 reviews | #9 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #8 12 reviews | #18 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #4 2 reviews |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | #5 1 reviews |
Your hotel is weighing AeroGuest Check-in by AeroGuest against Hudini Contactless Check-in by Hudini. Both aim to streamline guest arrivals with contactless solutions, but they differ in approach, features, and user experience. AeroGuest is a self-service platform focusing on pre-arrival guest empowerment, while Hudini emphasizes rapid, automated check-ins through ID verification. Which one aligns better with your hotel's operational needs and guest expectations?
Both products facilitate contactless check-ins, but AeroGuest boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating stronger current user satisfaction. While Hudini offers unique features like facial verification and quick onboarding, AeroGuest’s broader integrations and higher review count make it a more reliable choice at this time. Can either meet your specific operational goals effectively?
AeroGuest stands out with a 5/5 overall rating based on 11 reviews, whereas Hudini’s reviews are fewer and less recent, with only 4 reviews and no recent feedback. AeroGuest’s reviews highlight seamless, customizable guest experiences, including options for room selection and personalized communication. Hudini’s reviews praise stability, quick ROI, and high personalization but lack recent feedback, making AeroGuest's user experience more validated today.
Both platforms support contactless check-in, but AeroGuest offers more extensive integrations—over 26 verified partners versus Hudini’s 15—adding flexibility for your existing systems. AeroGuest's focus on automation and personalization, combined with its broad integration network, makes it a more robust choice for most hotels seeking reliable, scalable contactless solutions. Which aligns better with your hotel’s guest experience ambitions?
If your hotel needs a scalable, well-supported contactless check-in platform with proven guest satisfaction, go with AeroGuest. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and broad PMS integrations make it suited for both luxury and boutique hotels that prioritize automation and guest personalization.
If your hotel requires rapid deployment of a streamlined check-in process with facial verification and minimal setup, Hudini could be appealing. It’s particularly suitable for resorts or properties that value quick onboarding and have staff comfortable with automation, but its smaller review base suggests less user feedback validation.
In summary, AeroGuest’s higher review volume and recent positive feedback make it the more dependable choice for most hotels. Hudini can serve niche needs but carries more risk due to limited recent reviews.
AeroGuest scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.77/5 compared to Hudini's 4.75/5, based on recent reviews. Both systems are praised for stability and simple interfaces, but AeroGuest’s onboarding process is rated 4.6/5, slightly stronger than Hudini’s 4.25/5. Reviewers mention AeroGuest’s straightforward setup and intuitive guest interface, which facilitates staff adoption and guest satisfaction.
Hudini’s UI is praised for its responsiveness and personalization options, yet some reviews note that project management issues have affected implementation timelines. AeroGuest’s slightly higher ease-of-use rating and more extensive user feedback suggest it’s marginally simpler for staff and guests to navigate. Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest offers 15 shared features with Hudini but includes four exclusive functionalities: PCI compliance, PMS integration, deposit collection, and marketing opt-in—crucial for hotels seeking advanced compliance and marketing capabilities. Hudini provides only one unique feature: Lobby Kiosk, which may appeal to properties wanting physical self-service options.
Shared features include guest registration, document upload, and room selection, but AeroGuest’s additional features support complex operational needs. Its PCI compliance and payment integrations offer enhanced security and revenue opportunities, while Hudini’s kiosk is limited in scope. Given the broader feature set, AeroGuest edges ahead for hotels seeking comprehensive contactless solutions.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.77/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and comprehensive onboarding. Testimonials highlight their quick, helpful assistance, which is critical during implementation. Hudini’s support is rated at 4.75/5 with positive comments on their dedication; however, some reviews mention project management challenges, impacting satisfaction.
Given AeroGuest’s marginally higher scores and more reviews, it appears to offer more consistent support. Reliable support is vital for smooth deployment and ongoing operation, making AeroGuest the preferred choice here. Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest integrates with 26 verified partners, including major PMS, access control, and channel management systems like SALTO, Oracle Hospitality, and SiteMinder. Hudini connects to 15 verified partners, sharing key integrations such as SALTO and Oracle but lacking some of AeroGuest’s extensive network.
AeroGuest’s broader integration options provide more flexibility, better future-proofing, and less reliance on workarounds. If your hotel depends on multiple systems, AeroGuest’s extensive partner list makes it the clearer choice.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s 11 reviews in the last six months and 94% likelihood to recommend reflect strong recent user satisfaction across segments like city center and boutique hotels. Hudini’s reviews are older, and its ratings are less recent, which diminishes confidence in current performance.
Property types such as luxury and boutique hotels rate AeroGuest higher, citing ease of use and reliable integrations. With recent, positive feedback and more reviews, AeroGuest is clearly favored by hoteliers today.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest charges a flat base price of $400 with no additional implementation or monthly fees, offering straightforward pricing. Hudini’s base price is $900, also without extra charges, but it is more expensive upfront.
While AeroGuest’s lower initial cost makes it attractive for hotels with tighter budgets, Hudini’s higher fee may be justified if its unique features align perfectly with your property’s needs. Overall, AeroGuest provides better value for the majority of hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope—AeroGuest provides a wider set of features, integrations, and a stronger track record of recent reviews. If your primary goal is a reliable, scalable contactless check-in platform with proven support, AeroGuest is the clear choice.
Choose AeroGuest if you value extensive integrations, higher user satisfaction, and a broader feature set that can grow with your hotel’s needs. Hudini might work if you need a fast-deploying, facial verification-based solution, but limited recent feedback raises concerns.
For most hotels, AeroGuest’s higher review volume, recent positive ratings, and more comprehensive features make it the safer, more effective choice today.
According to HTR's product database, AeroGuest Check-in and Hudini Contactless Check-in share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Collect Deposits | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
| Marketing Communications Opt-in | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| PMS Integration |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AeroGuest Check-in and Hudini Contactless Check-in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. AeroGuest Check-in offers 26 verified integration partners, while Hudini Contactless Check-in offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. AeroGuest Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AeroGuest Check-in: No. Hudini Contactless Check-in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AeroGuest has an HT Score of 0 and Hudini has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property