The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
Pegipegi shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while Pegipegi users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and Pegipegi hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to facilitate online bookings, but Amadeus offers a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive integration and global reach, while Pegipegi appears more suited to broader travel arrangements without specialized hotel booking features. Your team must consider whether you prioritize a dedicated hotel booking solution or a multi-service travel platform.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® boasts a comprehensive set of features, a substantial review base, and a global footprint, making it a compelling choice for hotels focused on direct bookings. Pegipegi, however, has no reviews or feature set listed, indicating a less mature, less tailored solution for hotel-specific booking needs. So, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
Amadeus leads in overall ratings, with a score of 72.2 out of 100 based on 93 reviews, including recent feedback, and an 87% likelihood to recommend. It scores 4.39 out of 5 for overall satisfaction, with notable praise for its ability to increase revenue and integrate with other systems. Conversely, Pegipegi’s profile shows no reviews or ratings, indicating a lack of recent user feedback or a smaller, less established presence.
Amadeus’s reviews highlight its capacity to boost direct bookings through advanced pricing, marketing, and multi-channel integrations. Pegipegi’s lack of detailed reviews or user feedback makes it difficult to assess its effectiveness or suitability for hotel use. Given the data, Amadeus clearly has the more tested and proven track record for hotels seeking a booking engine that drives revenue and integrates widely. The question remains: Are you willing to depend on an unreviewed platform, or do you prefer the tried-and-true leader?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally integrated booking engine with extensive marketing and reporting tools, go with Amadeus. Its 36 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, loyalty integrations, and Google Hotel Ads, make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels aiming to optimize direct bookings and revenue management.
If, however, your focus is on a simple, potentially broader travel platform that offers aggregated booking services without hotel-specific features or a solid review base, Pegipegi might seem appealing. But with no user feedback or feature list, it’s less suitable for hotels prioritizing reliable, proven booking solutions. Given the data, Amadeus is the clear choice if your goal is to maximize hotel-specific booking efficiency.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® scores 4.25 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface and strong onboarding process rated at 4.01 out of 5. Some reviews mention initial complexity but highlight that dedicated support helps staff adapt quickly. Support responsiveness, however, is mixed, with some hotel teams expressing frustration with slow responses.
Pegipegi provides no available ratings or review comments, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its platform’s simplicity or complexity cannot be determined from the available data. Therefore, the edge goes to Amadeus, which, despite some learning curve, has a proven, rated onboarding and usability experience.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® offers 36 exclusive features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, loyalty programs, and integration with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. These features support a full-fledged hotel booking operation and revenue optimization.
Pegipegi offers no listed features, making it impossible to compare specific functionalities or determine its capability to meet hotel booking demands. Based on available information, Amadeus’s extensive feature set clearly positions it as the superior product for hotels seeking a comprehensive booking engine. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22 out of 5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences—some praising responsiveness, others noting slow responses and unresolved issues. Many hoteliers value the dedicated account management and consultative approach but wish for more consistent support quality.
Pegipegi provides no reviews or ratings, so customer support quality cannot be assessed. Given the data, Amadeus’s support structure, despite some flaws, is the better-supported option. The lack of support data for Pegipegi makes it the less reliable choice for hotels needing dependable assistance.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including prominent travel systems like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. These integrations cover PMS, payment gateways, distribution channels, and marketing tools, facilitating a connected hotel operation.
Pegipegi has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring seamless connectivity. Therefore, Amadeus holds the edge in ecosystem connectivity, essential for hotels with complex operational needs. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus enjoys a high overall rating of 4.39/5, with positive feedback from diverse hotel segments, especially independent properties (4.36/5) and boutique hotels (4.61/5). Recent reviews reinforce its reputation for improving revenue and user experience.
Pegipegi has no reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on the available ratings, Amadeus is the preferred choice for high-rated, hotel-specific booking solutions. Its broad acceptance among hoteliers affirms its value.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly available, but it typically involves a custom quote based on property size and needs, indicating a potentially higher investment level. Pegipegi also does not list pricing, suggesting it may operate on a different, possibly less transparent model.
Given the absence of specific pricing info, your team should expect to negotiate directly with providers. However, the high ratings and extensive features of Amadeus suggest it is a premium product aligning with larger or more revenue-focused hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget, prefers a less complex platform, or requires a system with minimal setup and straightforward features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced hotel-specific booking features, extensive integrations, or proven support and user feedback.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, well-rated solution with extensive features, high user satisfaction, and broad integration. Its focus on direct hotel bookings makes it a suitable choice for hotels aiming to boost revenue through a proven platform.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported booking engine with reliable support, Amadeus is the clear winner. Its large review base and recent positive feedback underscore its effectiveness and reliability.
Pegipegi, lacking reviews, features, and support data, remains an untested option. It may serve well for travel agencies or businesses requiring broader travel booking capabilities but is less suitable as a dedicated hotel booking engine.
In conclusion, for hoteliers prioritizing proven performance, advanced features, and extensive integrations, Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out as the superior choice.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Pegipegi share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Pegipegi share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while Pegipegi offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. Pegipegi: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and Pegipegi has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor