The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 427 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Price comparison widget and Flexible dates.
Simplotel shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Pooled inventory and Gift Vouchers.
Side-by-side ratings based on 427 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 332 |
After analyzing 427 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while Simplotel users highlight service and support, user-friendly interface and design, customer experience enhancement. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
Service and Support
▾
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
+
User-friendly interface and design
▾
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
+
Customer experience enhancement
▾
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Integration and Optimization
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | #5 127 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | #6 163 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | #9 20 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #14 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | #6 139 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | #4 187 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | #4 101 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | #9 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | #13 11 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | #35 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | #2 307 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | #15 3 reviews |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® Booking Engine and Simplotel Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings but approach the task differently: Amadeus offers a comprehensive, enterprise-level solution, while Simplotel emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Your choice should align with your hotel’s size, target market, and desired feature set.
Amadeus boasts a larger review base with more recent feedback, making its ratings and insights more current and reliable. Simplotel, however, enjoys a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, signaling strong user satisfaction today. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Both products serve the core purpose of converting website visitors into confirmed guests, but they do so with different strengths that may appeal to different hoteliers. Amadeus’s platform is built for large hotels or chains seeking extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, and detailed analytics, though some users find its interface complex. Simplotel’s focus on ease of use, rapid setup, and affordability makes it attractive for smaller hotels or properties prioritizing quick deployment and straightforward management.
Where Amadeus excels is in its broad feature set, including unique offerings like Tripadvisor Bookings and availability blocks, supported by its extensive global presence across 34 countries. Simplotel’s recent reviews (14 in the last 6 months) signal a more active user base and ongoing improvements, especially in mobile responsiveness and customization.
Would you prefer a platform with a long-established reputation and advanced features, or one that is more agile and easier to manage?
If your hotel operates at a larger scale, requires extensive integration with PMS and other systems, and values comprehensive analytics, Amadeus is your best fit. Its proven e-commerce features, such as flexible dates, Google Pay, and Tripadvisor bookings, support high-volume, multi-property management.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a budget-friendly, easy-to-implement solution that boosts direct bookings with minimal fuss, Simplotel is the smarter choice. It offers an intuitive interface, customizable templates, and robust marketing tools—ideal for small to medium properties seeking quick results.
For properties prioritizing deep integrations and advanced revenue tools, Amadeus’s larger feature set and global presence make it the logical pick. For those emphasizing simplicity, affordability, and active recent support, Simplotel outperforms.
Amadeus’s user rating for ease of use is 4.25/5, with reviews noting a steep learning curve and some complexity in navigating its extensive features. Hoteliers report that it can be challenging initially, but daily users find it manageable once they’re familiar.
Simplotel scores 4.65/5 on ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and friendly customer support. Multiple users commend how fast their teams adopt the platform and how straightforward it is to update rates and content.
Edge: Simplotel.
Amadeus offers six features exclusive to its platform, including a price comparison widget, Tripadvisor Bookings, and Apple/Google Pay integration, supporting advanced revenue strategies. It also provides tools like flexible dates and availability blocks, totaling 30 shared features with Simplotel.
Simplotel’s unique features include pooled inventory, gift vouchers, social media booking integration, and room substitutions, enhancing guest engagement and flexibility. It has seven exclusive features, such as Stripe payments and customizable exit intent modals.
In total, Amadeus’s feature count surpasses Simplotel’s, especially with its advanced booking and payment options.
Edge: Amadeus.
Customer support ratings reveal a significant difference: Amadeus scores 3.22/5, with reviews citing slow responses and inconsistent assistance, despite some praise for account management. Many users report delays in issue resolution and difficulty in getting timely support.
Simplotel scores 4.69/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and effective support. Users appreciate proactive communication, quick issue resolution, and personalized assistance, making support a clear strength.
Edge: Simplotel.
Amadeus boasts a verified partner network of 104 integrations, including major platforms like SiteMinder, RevMax, and Profitroom. It supports extensive connectivity with PMS, GDS, and channel management tools, facilitating complex, large-scale operations.
Simplotel has 22 verified partners, including industry leaders like Cloudbeds, Triptease, and RateGain. While fewer in number, these integrations cover essential hotel functions and marketing tools.
The sheer volume of Amadeus’s integrations favors large, multi-system setups, but Simplotel’s focused partnerships deliver excellent value for smaller hotels.
Edge: Amadeus.
Simplotel’s review count (297) significantly exceeds Amadeus’s 93, with more recent feedback (14 reviews in the last 6 months vs. none for Amadeus). Its overall rating of 4.75/5 is higher than Amadeus’s 4.39/5, reflecting current user satisfaction.
Hotel segments like luxury and boutique hotels rate Simplotel higher, with many reviewers praising its simplicity and support. Amadeus’s ratings are solid but less recent, making its current standing less certain.
Edge: Simplotel.
Amadeus’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it is known to be a premium, enterprise-level product with a potential implementation fee and no freemium option.
Simplotel charges a straightforward $500/month, with no trial or implementation fee, making it accessible for small to medium hotels seeking affordability.
If budget is a key concern, Simplotel provides clear, predictable pricing, while Amadeus’s costs are typically higher and more variable.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a simple, quick-to-deploy system.
Not ideal if your hotel demands deep integrations, complex revenue management tools, or operates at a large scale.
Amadeus iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out for its comprehensive feature set, global reach, and extensive integrations. It’s suited for large, multi-property operators needing sophisticated tools to manage revenue and operations efficiently.
Simplotel excels in simplicity, affordability, and active support, making it the preferred choice for small to mid-sized hotels focused on increasing direct bookings quickly and reliably.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform and your team can handle complexity, Amadeus is the clear choice. For hotels valuing ease of use, recent positive reviews, and budget-friendly options, Simplotel is the smarter pick.
In conclusion, prioritize Amadeus if your hotel demands extensive integrations and advanced revenue tools; choose Simplotel if you want a straightforward, high-performing booking engine backed by recent positive feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Simplotel Booking Engine share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Apple Pay | ||
| Availability block | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Flexible dates | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Price comparison widget | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Social Media Integration/Bookings | ||
| Stripe | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Although customer support is generally rated as responsive and helpful, there are calls for more proactive communication. Monthly check-ins and traini... Although customer support is generally rated as responsive and helpful, there are calls for more proactive communication. Monthly check-ins and training materials are suggested for enhanced service.
Simplotel's booking engine stands out for its intuitive and user-friendly design, simplifying navigation for guests and hoteliers. Reviews consistentl... Simplotel's booking engine stands out for its intuitive and user-friendly design, simplifying navigation for guests and hoteliers. Reviews consistently mention improved booking experience and engagement, translating to increased bookings and customer satisfaction.
The platform enhances guest experiences by streamlining booking processes and supporting upselling and cross-selling services. This feature is cited f... The platform enhances guest experiences by streamlining booking processes and supporting upselling and cross-selling services. This feature is cited for adding value and contributing to increased revenue.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users appreciate the potential for customizing brand-specific templates and designs but express a demand for more flexibility. There is feedback... Many users appreciate the potential for customizing brand-specific templates and designs but express a demand for more flexibility. There is feedback on limited options for personalizing website layouts and dynamic content.
Simplotel provides robust analytics and reporting features aiding in data-driven decision-making and marketing strategies. Users find these insights b... Simplotel provides robust analytics and reporting features aiding in data-driven decision-making and marketing strategies. Users find these insights beneficial for optimizing bookings, although some suggest further advancements in analytics tools.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Simplotel Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while Simplotel Booking Engine offers 22. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Simplotel Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. Simplotel Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and Simplotel has 90. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor