The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Urgency messaging and Referral Reporting.
STAAH shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Facebook conversion tracking and Pooled inventory.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 13 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while STAAH users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | #35 4 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | #36 5 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | #37 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | #36 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | #33 9 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | #34 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | #14 11 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, your goal is to convert website visitors into loyal guests while managing revenue and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus's iHotelier® Booking Engine and STAAH's SwiftBook aim to fulfill these needs but approach them differently. Amadeus offers extensive integrations and a broad feature set rooted in proven e-commerce practices, while STAAH emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and strong support. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both platforms are designed to improve direct bookings and streamline management, but they diverge considerably in customer support, feature scope, and regional presence. With Amadeus's larger size and broader market footprint, it boasts more reviews and recent feedback, making it the more data-backed choice. Are you ready to dig into the details?
Amadeus’s iHotelier is built around advanced e-commerce functionalities, offering a seamless booking experience and integrated marketing tools that can fine-tune revenue strategies. STAAH focuses on user-friendly interface design, quick setup, and support, making it easier for hotels to get started without steep learning curves.
While Amadeus has a broader global presence in over 34 countries, STAAH’s strengths lie in its local support and mobile-friendly approach. Amadeus’s complexity might challenge some users, whereas STAAH’s straightforward design appeals to properties seeking quick results. Given that STAAH has more recent reviews and a higher rating, does this suggest it’s better suited for hotels prioritizing ease of use and support?
If your hotel targets luxury, boutique, or resort segments, Amadeus’s extensive feature set and integration capabilities—such as loyalty programs, GDPR compliance, and A/B testing—make it the smarter choice. Its larger user base and more verified partners (104 vs 54) suggest it’s more established for complex operations.
Conversely, if your hotel is smaller, budget-focused, or highly value-driven, STAAH’s streamlined platform and strong customer support—highlighted by a 4.88/5 support rating—offer a compelling alternative. The absence of some advanced features in STAAH might be a limitation for large-scale or highly segmented hotels, but its ease of use and affordability are clear advantages.
In summary, choose Amadeus if your hotel needs robust customization, integrations, and advanced marketing tools; opt for STAAH if you value simplicity, quick onboarding, and responsive support.
Amadeus’s UI has a rating of 4.25/5; users describe it as friendly once familiar but note the platform’s complexity and a steep learning curve initially. Onboarding is solid at 4.01/5, but some reviews mention the need for more hands-on training, and support response times are inconsistent, with a 3.22/5 rating.
STAAH’s interface scores higher at 4.69/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design and ease of understanding. Its onboarding score is 4.63/5, and customers frequently highlight quick, helpful support that simplifies daily management.
Edge: STAAH.
Amadeus boasts 17 features exclusive to its platform, including advanced options like loyalty program integration, GDPR compliance, booking abandonment recapture, and A/B testing. It also has a broader feature set overall, totaling 19 shared features with STAAH.
STAAH offers only 6 features unique to its platform, such as group booking management, gift vouchers, and Stripe integration. While these are valuable, they are less comprehensive compared to Amadeus’s suite.
Given the wider feature set and specialized capabilities, Amadeus clearly leads in feature depth. Edge: Amadeus.
Support ratings tell a clear story: Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22/5, with reviews citing slow responses and inconsistent service. In contrast, STAAH’s support is rated 4.88/5, with reviews describing the team as helpful, friendly, and quick to respond.
Hoteliers have called STAAH’s support “amazing,” appreciating their proactive assistance and dedicated property team. Amadeus’s support, while professional, shows room for improvement.
Edge: STAAH.
Amadeus’s platform integrates with 104 verified partners, including major hospitality systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Oaky. STAAH has 54 verified partners, with key integrations including BookLogic, Preno, and RMS, but fewer overall.
Both platforms share 18 partners, but Amadeus’s larger network offers more options for complex setups and future expansions. This extensive integration ecosystem makes Amadeus a more flexible choice for properties with diverse tech stacks.
Edge: Amadeus.
Review data reveals that STAAH is rated at 4.81/5, with 13 recent reviews, while Amadeus scores 4.39/5 with 93 reviews, though no recent feedback. Hotels in the boutique, resort, and city center segments rate STAAH higher, citing its simplicity and support.
Amadeus’s ratings are solid but slightly lower, possibly reflecting its larger, more complex user base and some reported challenges in customer service. If recent feedback and high ratings are your priorities, STAAH’s higher score indicates greater satisfaction among users.
Edge: STAAH.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed, as they operate on custom quotes based on property size and needs. Neither platform offers a freemium or trial version, making direct cost comparisons challenging.
Your hotel’s budget and willingness to invest in advanced features will influence the decision. Given the lack of transparent pricing, consider requesting tailored quotes from both vendors based on your specific requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-constrained, or prefers a quick, simple setup.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly advanced marketing tools, extensive integrations, or complex customization.
Amadeus offers a broad, feature-rich booking engine with deep integrations and a global footprint, making it ideal for larger hotels and chains. Its extensive capabilities support complex marketing, revenue strategies, and multi-region operations but come with a steeper learning curve and mixed support reviews.
STAAH emphasizes simplicity, strong support, and affordability, making it suitable for smaller hotels or properties that prioritize quick results and ease of management. Its higher recent ratings and dedicated support team make it a compelling choice for hoteliers wanting peace of mind.
If your hotel needs advanced features, extensive integrations, and global reach, go with Amadeus. If you seek simplicity, responsive support, and quick onboarding, STAAH is the better option.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and STAAH Booking Engine share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ADA Compliant | ||
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Loyalty program integration | ||
| Meal plans | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Stripe | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and STAAH Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while STAAH Booking Engine offers 54. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAAH Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. STAAH Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and STAAH has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor