The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 109 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ROI — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard.
Aven Hospitality shines when it comes to ease of use and user experience — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Availability Management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 109 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 53 | 56 |
After analyzing 109 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its integration and usability, innovation and updates, analytics and reporting, while Aven Hospitality users highlight ease of use and user experience, connectivity and distribution reach, innovation and technology updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Usability
▾
|
+
Ease of Use and User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Innovation and Updates
▾
|
+
Connectivity and Distribution Reach
▾
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
+
Innovation and Technology Updates
▾
|
|
+
Revenue and Pricing Strategy
▾
|
+
Booking Engine Performance
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
−
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
−
Customization and Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Issues and Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | #11 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 24 reviews | #6 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 10 reviews | #2 15 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 3 reviews | #2 6 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 18 reviews | #7 20 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 17 reviews | #3 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 16 reviews | #3 20 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 5 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 13 reviews | #2 34 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #5 12 reviews | #6 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 4 reviews | #3 6 reviews |
| Middle East | #3 4 reviews | #2 4 reviews |
Choosing the right central reservations system (CRS) is critical for your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both Amadeus iHotelier and SynXis by Aven Hospitality aim to streamline distribution, enhance connectivity, and simplify reservation management, but they diverge in their approach, features, and support structures. Your decision hinges on the specific needs of your property, your team’s technology comfort level, and your strategic priorities.
Amadeus's iHotelier boasts a longer market presence, more extensive feature set, and a higher review count with recent feedback highlighting its strengths. SynXis, although newer, offers impressive connectivity and user-friendliness but has mixed reviews on support and speed. Which product aligns better with your hotel's operational demands?
Amadeus iHotelier and SynXis both solve the core problem of reservation management and distribution but do so through different lenses. Amadeus provides an all-in-one CRS platform with embedded revenue management tools, extensive channel management, and advanced analytics, aiming to maximize revenue and simplify operations. Conversely, SynXis emphasizes connectivity, ease of use, and stability, helping hotels improve distribution reach and manage multiple properties efficiently.
Amadeus's platform has a broader feature set, including unique tools like Metasearch connectivity and a reporting dashboard, which are absent in SynXis. SynXis’s focus on seamless integrations and a straightforward interface makes it attractive for hotels prioritizing rapid deployment and connectivity. Given these differences, you should consider whether your hotel needs a comprehensive revenue engine or a more straightforward, connectivity-focused system.
While Amadeus enjoys a higher overall rating (4.57/5 vs. 4.2/5) and more recent positive reviews, SynXis is praised for its ease of use and connectivity. Does your team need a full-featured, scalable CRS or a simple, highly connected platform? The choice depends on your overall operational complexity and strategic focus.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich CRS capable of managing complex revenue strategies, extensive distribution, and in-depth analytics, Amadeus iHotelier is the clear choice. It’s better suited for mid-scale to large hotels, chains, or properties that require sophisticated distribution channels, market intelligence, and customization options.
If your hotel values connectivity, simplicity, and quick deployment—especially if you manage multiple properties with a focus on OTA reach and direct bookings—SynXis could serve you well. It’s ideal for hotels seeking a user-friendly system with reliable, high-level OTA integration and a stable platform.
For independent or boutique hotels that want a straightforward system with solid connectivity, SynXis offers an attractive option. Larger hotels or those with complex revenue management needs should lean toward Amadeus, which provides more advanced capabilities and a broader feature set.
Amadeus's iHotelier scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.43/5 vs. 4.38/5), but both platforms are rated favorably. Amadeus users note that initial setup can be complex, with a learning curve, but once familiar, it becomes intuitive; one review states, “It’s a complete service, and after some training, it’s very user-friendly.”
SynXis is praised for its simplicity and connections, highlighted as "no-nonsense" and easy to navigate by users. It’s especially valued for its straightforward interface that minimizes training time, with reviews emphasizing how quickly staff adapt.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 15 shared features plus 3 unique to its platform, including Metasearch connectivity, Cancellation Policies, and a Reporting Dashboard—features that give it an edge in analytics and marketing tools. SynXis, with only one exclusive feature (Availability Management), focuses on core reservation functions and connectivity.
Amadeus's additional features are geared toward maximizing revenue and marketing, offering more customization and control options. SynXis’s strengths lie in OTA connectivity and property management, but it lacks some advanced analytics and marketing features.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores slightly higher (4.15/5 vs. 4.07/5), with reviews citing “friendly support” and “responsive account management” as strengths. However, some reviews mention a steep learning curve and the need for ongoing training.
SynXis receives mixed feedback, with users appreciating the connectivity but citing delays and outages as concerns. Support is described as “helpful but sometimes slow,” with some users frustrated by technical issues and slow resolution times.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus leads with 104 verified partners, including key integrations with Profitroom, Inntopia, and LaaSie.ai, and features a robust network of shared partners like OTAs, PMS, and RMS providers. SynXis has 80 verified partners, including Triptease, IVvy, and Bookassist, with many shared partners but fewer total integrations.
Both systems connect well with major platforms; however, Amadeus’s larger partner ecosystem provides broader flexibility, especially for larger, multi-channel distribution strategies.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating (4.57/5) surpasses SynXis’s (4.2/5), with recent reviews reinforcing its strength. Independent hotels rate Amadeus higher (average 4.85/5) compared to SynXis’s 4.5/5, especially in small and boutique segments.
Larger hotels and chains tend to favor Amadeus for its advanced features and analytics, while SynXis receives higher satisfaction among hotels prioritizing connectivity and ease of use.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing, typically requiring direct contact for quotes, suggesting a tailored, potentially higher investment aligned with its extensive features. SynXis charges a fixed $400 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup fees, making it more transparent and predictable.
Your choice may depend on budget flexibility—Amadeus is likely more expensive but offers more advanced capabilities, while SynXis provides a straightforward, predictable fee structure.
Amadeus iHotelier offers a comprehensive, feature-rich CRS with a broad partner network, making it ideal for hotels seeking advanced revenue management, marketing, and analytics. Its higher review count and recent positive feedback reinforce its leadership in the space.
SynXis provides a user-friendly, connectivity-focused platform that excels in OTA integration and property management. It’s best suited for hotels prioritizing ease of use, rapid deployment, and reliable connectivity, especially if budget constraints are a concern.
If your hotel needs a full-scale, scalable CRS with advanced features, Amadeus is the better choice. Conversely, if your primary goal is seamless connectivity and straightforward management, SynXis is a compelling alternative.
In conclusion, for properties aiming to maximize revenue and analytics, Amadeus’s broader capabilities make it the smarter investment. For hotels seeking reliable connectivity with less complexity, SynXis delivers excellent value, particularly if recent reviews reflect your priorities.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and SynXis Central Reservation System share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| Cancellation Policies | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
What hoteliers love
TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the c... TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the complicated OTA Sync implementation and the need for the platform to become more user-friendly. Several reviews highlight the long integration times and a few usability challenges that need improvement.
There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new featu... There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new features, while others feel that certain aspects, like iHotelier CRS, need more significant updates to remain contemporary and intuitive.
The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions... The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions. Users highlight the detailed business intelligence reports and market intelligence capabilities as critical components for strategy development.
Where hoteliers push back
The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness a... The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, though there are mentions of delayed replies and insufficient training. The need for local support in various regions and more training options is also highlighted.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigatio... Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigation and efficient design make it simple for hoteliers to perform complex tasks with minimal support. Users particularly appreciate the ability to make updates easily across multiple properties, which saves significant time.
Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel... Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel conversions. The platform offers high reliability and consistent performance for various distribution channels. The integration with PMS and RMS systems is seamless, allowing hoteliers to maintain data integrity across platforms.
Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to Syn... Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to SynXis. These updates reflect the company’s dedication to staying ahead of industry trends and addressing evolving customer needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem res... Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem resolution and long wait times. Additionally, transitioning towards self-service support options has presented challenges for users needing quick and effective assistance.
While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customizati... While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customization options, especially for unique property needs. The delay in implementing new features and the limited scope for customization are recurring themes in the reviews.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and SynXis Central Reservation System share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) offers 104 verified integration partners, while SynXis Central Reservation System offers 80. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS): No. SynXis Central Reservation System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 80 and Aven Hospitality has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor