The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AmicHotel shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and On premise.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, AmicHotel users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between AmicHotel and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s needs for features, ease of use, support, and integration. AmicHotel, with its minimal reviews and no recent data, offers limited information, whereas Infor HMS boasts a robust presence with over 46 reviews, recent ratings, and a clear operational focus. Do you prioritize a system with extensive features and proven support, or are you looking for a streamlined, perhaps less complex solution?
Both products aim to improve hotel management efficiency, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans. So, which system aligns better with your strategic goals?
AmicHotel presents as a basic, all-in-one property management system, but with no recent reviews or detailed features, it’s difficult to gauge its real-world effectiveness. In contrast, Infor HMS offers a comprehensive suite of functionalities, backed by 46 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.04 out of 5, indicating solid user satisfaction.
While AmicHotel claims to streamline reservations, check-ins, and billing, its lack of validation through user feedback makes it less attractive for hotels needing proven reliability. Conversely, Infor’s extensive feature set — including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and integrations — highlights its maturity. Are you willing to accept unverified claims, or do you prefer a product with recent user validation?
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS with proven scalability, automation, and integration options, Infor HMS is the superior choice. Its 46 reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating reflect a system trusted by hotels across multiple regions. For hotels looking for a simple, possibly less expensive solution with minimal support expectations, AmicHotel might seem appealing, but the lack of recent feedback raises questions about its viability.
For hotels targeting operational efficiency, revenue optimization, and a system that supports growth, Infor HMS’s rich features and recent positive reviews make it the smarter choice. If your hotel is small, budget-constrained, or prefers manual processes, AmicHotel could be considered, but beware of the limited data supporting its capabilities.
Based on available ratings, Infor HMS scores 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive navigation and mobile capabilities. Support responsiveness and onboarding are also rated 4.04 out of 5, indicating a decent experience during implementation and daily use. Users mention that Infor is “easy to navigate once familiarized,” despite some initial complexity.
AmicHotel, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use and no recent reviews, offers no concrete data to support its usability. Its lack of user feedback suggests it may not be as mature or user-friendly as Infor. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, guest profiles, online support, multi-lingual, multi-currency, guest CRM, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audit. These features are well-documented and frequently praised in reviews, especially for automating reservations, rate loading, and reporting.
AmicHotel offers no specialized features or modules, making its feature set ambiguous at best. The absence of detailed functionality and user feedback puts it at a disadvantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support is consistently rated 4.04 out of 5, with reviewers citing responsiveness and professionalism as major strengths. Comments like “support team is very helpful and guides us through issues” reinforce its reliability.
AmicHotel, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 support rating, provides no evidence of support quality. Its lack of validation makes it hard to trust support responsiveness or effectiveness. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has 113 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, plus integrations with revenue management and payment providers. This extensive network simplifies operations and reduces manual work.
AmicHotel reports no verified integrations, severely limiting its applicability in a modern, connected hotel environment. Without integrations, your team may face inefficiencies and increased manual entry. Edge: Infor HMS.
Given the absence of recent, detailed reviews for AmicHotel, it cannot be confidently rated or compared. Infor HMS’s 46 reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, along with a 74% likelihood to recommend, indicate broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially in North America and Europe.
Property types like boutique, city center, and branded hotels rate Infor higher, with many praising its automation and support. For hotels prioritizing proven user satisfaction, Infor HMS is clearly favored. Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not publish explicit pricing, and there are no implementation or monthly fees listed. Typically, such systems are custom-priced based on hotel size, features, and deployment scope, but the absence of publicly available pricing data makes direct comparison impossible.
Your hotel should request quotes tailored to your needs, especially for Infor HMS, which is a large-scale solution. The lack of pricing transparency favors cautious inquiry.
Not ideal if your hotel needs reliable support, advanced features, or scalable integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, operates on a minimal budget, or prefers a simple, standalone system.
The core difference lies in maturity and feature depth. Infor HMS provides a full suite of integrated modules with proven support, extensive reviews, and recent positive feedback. AmicHotel, lacking recent validation, appears to be a basic or less-developed platform with no available recent reviews or detailed features.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel aims to automate operations, improve guest experiences, and scale growth confidently. Its extensive integrations, support, and proven performance make it the safer, more reliable choice for most mid to large hotels.
Opt for AmicHotel only if your hotel needs minimal functionality and you’re prepared to accept the risk of unverified support and limited features. Its lack of recent data suggests it may not meet the expectations of modern hotel management.
In summary, Infor HMS’s recent reviews, comprehensive features, and regional presence make it the clear leader for hotels seeking a trusted, versatile property management system.
According to HTR's product database, AmicHotel and Infor HMS share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 20 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AmicHotel and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. AmicHotel offers 1 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AmicHotel: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AmicHotel has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor