The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
Angelfish shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while Angelfish users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Angelfish Software hinges on your hotel’s priorities and operational needs. Both are designed to optimize your digital presence, but Amadeus’s platform is an established, feature-rich solution with a global footprint, whereas Angelfish offers a niche analytics tool with no recent reviews to support its efficacy. Which aligns better with your current strategy?
Amadeus’s booking engine is widely used by a diverse range of hotels worldwide, thanks to its extensive feature set and international reach, backed by over 90 recent reviews. Angelfish, with no recent reviews, remains a less proven option, especially in the competitive booking engine space. Are you ready to rely on a solution with proven market presence and extensive hotel feedback?
Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine is the clear choice for hotels seeking a trusted, scalable, and feature-packed booking platform, supported by a large, recent review base. It boasts a 4.39/5 overall rating from 93 reviews, with a high likelihood to recommend at 87%. Conversely, Angelfish lacks recent reviews and a rating, making it difficult to assess its reliability or performance in today’s hotel tech landscape.
For hoteliers who want a dependable, well-supported system with proven results, Amadeus is the superior option. If your hotel’s focus is on analytics and log data management, Angelfish’s niche may be relevant, but its lack of recent feedback limits confidence in its current capabilities.
Amadeus and Angelfish serve different core purposes—booking versus analytics. Amadeus’s platform is designed to convert website visitors into direct bookings, with a focus on streamlined user experience and revenue enhancement, while Angelfish’s tool is geared toward analyzing website traffic and server logs for strategic insights.
Amadeus’s booking engine is built around proven e-commerce best practices, offering features like mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, rate flexibility, loyalty integrations, and multiple payment options. In contrast, Angelfish’s core strength lies in processing large volumes of log data to deliver real-time insights, but it lacks a dedicated booking interface.
Both solve different problems—Amadeus’s platform is a direct revenue driver, while Angelfish provides detailed website performance analysis. Do you need a system to drive bookings or one to understand your website traffic better?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive booking engine to maximize direct bookings and enhance guest experience, go with Amadeus. Its extensive feature set, including multi-currency, multilingual support, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor, makes it suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those aiming for international reach.
If your hotel’s priority is detailed website analytics and understanding user behavior through log data, Angelfish’s software may be relevant. Its real-time insights help optimize digital marketing strategies but lacks the booking features necessary for direct revenue generation.
For hotels seeking a proven, feature-rich booking platform with recent positive reviews, Amadeus is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re focused solely on data analysis and have minimal need for a booking engine, Angelfish could be suitable—but beware of its limited market presence.
Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine scores a 4.25/5 in ease of use, with a highly rated onboarding process at 4.01/5. Users describe its interface as intuitive once familiar, though initial complexity can be a slight hurdle. Support reviews note some inconsistency, but overall, staff adoption is manageable.
Angelfish’s interface, by contrast, is not rated or reviewed in recent data, making it impossible to compare usability directly. Its core function—log analysis—is inherently technical, likely requiring more specialized staff expertise.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-currency support, flexible rates, loyalty integrations, and advanced marketing tools like Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor bookings. It also features automated emails, rate plan comparisons, and conversion tracking—capabilities that directly influence booking success.
Angelfish, with no listed features beyond log analysis, focuses on data processing rather than booking functionalities. Its strength lies in raw data insights rather than operational features.
Given the extensive feature list, especially for direct booking enhancement, Amadeus clearly leads.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores a modest 3.22/5, with some reviews highlighting slow responses and inconsistent assistance. Yet, users appreciate the onboarding process rated at 4.01/5 and value the dedicated account management for revenue strategies.
Angelfish’s support data is absent, making it difficult to evaluate. As a small software provider, it may lack the extensive support infrastructure of a global player like Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has verified partnerships with 104 providers, including major systems like SiteMinder, Priority Software, and RevControl. Its broad integration network supports diverse hotel tech ecosystems, simplifying management and data sharing.
Angelfish offers only three verified integrations, including Hijiffy and Pitchup.com. Its limited partnership network constrains its ability to connect with other hotel systems.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39/5 from 93 reviews reflects broad hotel trust, especially among independent and boutique hotels, which rate it at 4.36/5 and 4.61/5, respectively. Recent reviews praise its revenue-boosting capabilities, though some cite support delays.
Angelfish, with no recent reviews, cannot be rated accurately. Its lack of customer feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing for Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine is not publicly disclosed but typically involves a setup fee and monthly charges based on hotel size or usage. No free trial is offered.
Angelfish’s pricing details are similarly unavailable, and it lacks a free trial or transparent fee structure. Users should contact vendors directly for quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-focused, or primarily offline.
Not ideal if you need a booking platform or comprehensive customer engagement features.
Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine is a proven, versatile platform with extensive recent reviews, making it suitable for most hotels aiming to increase direct bookings and revenue. It offers broad integrations, a large feature set, and a track record of hotel satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a reliable booking system with features that support growth and international reach, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its recent review volume and overall ratings confirm its market strength.
Angelfish, with no recent feedback, remains a less certain option. Its focus on log analysis could benefit tech-savvy hotels prioritizing website performance insights, but its lack of proven recent performance metrics makes it a risky pick.
For most hotels ready to invest in a proven, feature-rich booking engine, Amadeus provides the confidence and functionality needed to succeed in competitive markets.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Angelfish Software share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Angelfish Software share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while Angelfish Software offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. Angelfish Software: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and Angelfish has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor