The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Arion shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Arion users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Arion |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Arion |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Arion |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Arion |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing between Arion by Arion and RMS by RMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems aim to improve hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their approach and scope. Arion emphasizes review management and AI-driven insights, while RMS offers a broad suite of operational tools and integrations. Are you prioritizing guest feedback and reputation, or streamlining core property operations?
As of now, RMS has a much stronger market presence, with over 7,000 users across 70 countries, a higher review count, and recent customer feedback from 20 reviews in the past six months. Arion, with no recent reviews, provides limited current data, making RMS the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven results.
Arion specializes in review aggregation and AI-based recommendations, making it suitable for hotels heavily invested in reputation management and customer feedback analysis. RMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive property management system that handles reservations, housekeeping, channel management, and revenue optimization, ideal for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and scalability.
If your hotel needs a system to monitor reviews and improve guest satisfaction through AI insights, Arion might seem appealing. Yet, RMS’s extensive feature set and proven scalability make it better suited for hotels managing multiple properties or complex operations. Do you want a system that focuses on reputation, or one that manages your entire property?
If your hotel requires a full-fledged property management solution with built-in booking, channel management, and guest engagement tools, RMS is the clear choice. Its platform supports rapid scalability, with features for reservations, housekeeping, and revenue management, suitable for hotels and resorts seeking operational growth.
Conversely, if your primary focus is gathering and analyzing guest reviews to enhance reputation and loyalty, Arion's AI-driven review summary and recommendation features could be useful. However, RMS’s larger user base and recent positive reviews make it the more dependable choice for hotels looking to grow and streamline their operations.
RMS scores 4.28 out of 5 for ease of use, with a well-rated onboarding process averaging 4.12 out of 5. Customers praise its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and helpful support, with comments like “It was the easiest onboarding process I’ve had of any system,” from Roomzzz Aparthotels.
Arion, however, has no recent reviews or ratings to evaluate its usability. Without current user feedback, it’s impossible to confirm how easy or difficult it is to adopt. Given RMS’s recent positive reviews, edge: RMS.
RMS offers an extensive suite of 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, booking engine, revenue management, group functions, housekeeping, guest CRM, and digital registration. Many of these features are designed to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
Arion’s features are limited to review analysis and AI recommendations, with no additional functionalities listed. Its focus on reputation management is narrower, and it lacks the breadth of tools RMS provides. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s customer support scores 4.48 out of 5, with recent reviews highlighting fast, helpful, and proactive assistance. Customers like the “very helpful,” immediate responses, and knowledgeable support staff, making onboarding and ongoing support smooth.
Arion’s support information is scarce, and with no recent reviews, we cannot confidently assess its support quality. RMS’s recent positive feedback makes it the clear leader. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, HiJiffy, and STR, facilitating seamless connectivity with booking channels, POS, payment processors, and marketing tools. These integrations allow for a unified operational ecosystem.
Arion, with no verified partners listed, offers no visible integrations, limiting its connectivity potential. RMS’s extensive partner network makes it more adaptable and scalable for hotels with complex tech stacks. Edge: RMS.
RMS has an overall rating of 4.56 out of 5 based on 293 reviews, all recent, with an 86% likelihood to recommend. Among different hotel segments, independent and boutique hotels rate RMS highly, with reviews emphasizing its ease, support, and feature depth.
Arion, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be compared accurately. RMS’s strong, recent review scores clearly show it is the preferred choice among hoteliers. Edge: RMS.
Arion’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may not operate on a transparent or subscription-based model. RMS costs $800 per month, with no free tier or trial, and offers a fixed subscription fee for its comprehensive platform.
Given RMS’s clear pricing, hoteliers can evaluate ROI based on its features. The lack of pricing info for Arion makes it difficult to compare value directly, but RMS’s established market presence and customer satisfaction justify the cost.
RMS is a broad, proven platform that covers nearly every aspect of hotel management, backed by extensive recent reviews and a large global user base. Its 74 features, high user satisfaction, and seamless integrations make it suitable for hotels aiming to grow efficiently and improve operational control.
Arion, however, offers a specialized review and AI insight tool, ideal for hotels focused on reputation over operations. Its lack of recent reviews and integrations makes it less suitable for hotels needing a full operational system.
If your hotel values proven scalability, extensive features, and recent positive feedback, RMS is the clear choice. For reputation-focused strategies with smaller scope, Arion might be an option, but its current lack of recent validation weakens its position.
Note: If assessing ROI and long-term support are priorities, RMS’s established presence and high user ratings make it the more reliable investment at this stage.
According to HTR's product database, Arion and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Arion |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Arion and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Arion offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Arion: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Arion has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor