The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 304 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Asana shines .
Monscierge shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
Side-by-side ratings based on 304 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 302 |
After analyzing 304 verified reviews, Asana users most value its , while Monscierge users highlight customization and branding, guest messaging and requests, local recommendations. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging and Requests
▾
|
|
|
+
Local Recommendations
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Negative Experiences and Criticisms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #14 1 reviews | #2 78 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 1 reviews | #3 129 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 47 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #6 15 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 148 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #3 65 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #4 112 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 23 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #32 1 reviews | #2 243 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #23 1 reviews | #5 24 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 4 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #2 7 reviews |
Choosing between Asana by Asana and Monscierge (Connect Staff) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to improve staff collaboration and streamline internal communication, but they operate very differently. Asana is a general project management tool, while Monscierge specializes in guest and staff interaction within hospitality. Which one better addresses your primary operational challenge?
Asana’s broad applicability makes it a flexible option for various industries, including hotels, yet it was not built explicitly for hospitality. Monscierge, on the other hand, focuses exclusively on hotel operations, offering features tailored to guest requests and multi-property management. Do you need a general team collaboration tool or a hospitality-specific experience?
Asana is a well-established project management tool praised for its straightforward interface and ease of learning, with a 4.5/5 overall rating based on two reviews. It offers only five core functionalities, making it suitable for teams that want simplicity but might struggle with hotel-specific workflows. Its main limitation is the lack of dedicated features for hospitality, which could lead to inconsistent use across departments.
Monscierge has a significantly higher rating (4.81/5 from 279 reviews), reflecting its specialized focus and maturity in the hotel industry. It offers 18 unique features explicitly designed for hotels, such as real-time task tracking, maintenance management, and multi-property monitoring. Its customer support is highly rated at 4.91/5, emphasizing strong vendor responsiveness.
Given the review count and recent feedback, Monscierge’s more recent data lends it a distinct advantage in understanding industry-specific needs. Would your team benefit from a dedicated hospitality platform designed to handle guest requests and operational workflows? If so, Monscierge is the more appropriate choice.
If your hotel needs a tool for guest request management, seamless staff communication, and multi-property oversight, Monscierge is the clear winner. Its 18 tailored features and high customer ratings make it an ideal fit for hotels seeking to enhance service delivery and operational efficiency.
Conversely, if your team needs a flexible, general task management platform to coordinate internal projects without hospitality-specific requirements, Asana might suffice. However, its limited features and lack of industry-specific integrations mean it’s less suited for a hotel environment.
For hotels prioritizing guest satisfaction and operational consistency, Monscierge’s dedicated features make it the better investment. If your team prefers a more customizable, team-focused collaboration tool and can manage its drawbacks, Asana could work, but it’s not tailored for hospitality.
Asana scores 4/5 on ease of use based on the two reviews, praised for its simple, intuitive interface. However, with only a 3/5 onboarding score, some users find initial setup and staff training require extra effort, especially since it isn’t designed specifically for hotels.
Monscierge outperforms here, with a 4.75/5 ease-of-use rating and an onboarding score of 4.8/5. Users frequently praise its straightforward content management, device flexibility, and minimal training requirements. Reviews note that staff adoption is smooth due to the platform’s tailored nature and the vendor’s responsive support.
Edge: Monscierge.
Asana offers five core project management features—task assignments, deadlines, project views, notifications, and integrations with a handful of third-party tools. It’s primarily suited for general team collaboration rather than specific hotel operations.
Monscierge provides 18 distinct features including real-time task tracking, maintenance scheduling, guest request escalations, multilingual support, analytics dashboards, and multi-property management. These features directly target hotel staff workflows, guest interactions, and operational oversight.
Given the depth and specificity of features, Monscierge clearly has the edge for hotel operations. Its dedicated functions support operational excellence and guest satisfaction, far surpassing Asana’s general task management.
Edge: Monscierge.
Asana’s customer support ratings are modest, at 2.5/5, with reviews mentioning difficulties in reporting and analysis features, especially in the free version. Some users report that support is slow or insufficient for hotel-specific needs, which can hinder staff training and onboarding.
Monscierge excels with a 4.91/5 customer support rating. Reviews highlight its responsive, knowledgeable team, with many praising the onboarding process and ongoing assistance. Customers often mention how this support accelerates implementation and resolves operational issues quickly.
Edge: Monscierge.
Asana currently has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hospitality or PMS systems. This could result in increased manual work or fragmented workflows for hotel teams.
Monscierge offers 11 verified integrations, including major industry partners like Oracle Hospitality, Cendyn, Cloudbeds, and Vingcard. These integrations enable smoother data flow, automation, and operational coherence across multiple hotel systems.
Edge: Monscierge.
With only two reviews, Asana’s ratings are limited, but it scores 4.5/5 overall, indicating moderate satisfaction. Its review highlights its simplicity but also notes it’s not built for hotel-specific processes.
Monscierge’s 279 reviews and a 4.81/5 average rating reflect broader, more recent positive feedback. Hotels appreciate its tailored features, ease of use, and dedicated support, leading to a higher confidence level in its suitability for hospitality.
Therefore, Monscierge is the more trusted platform among hoteliers, especially given the volume and recency of reviews.
Edge: Monscierge.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing structures, but neither offers a freemium or free trial. Asana's pricing model is typically subscription-based for teams over 15 members, while Monscierge’s pricing is likely aligned with its enterprise hospitality focus, often customized per property.
Given the lack of transparent pricing data, your hotel should expect to engage directly with vendors for quotes tailored to your size and needs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs dedicated guest service modules or multi-property management features.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, has minimal guest interaction needs, or prefers a more general collaboration platform without hospitality-specific features.
Monscierge provides a specialized suite of features explicitly designed for hotels, with high customer satisfaction and extensive integrations. Its focus on guest requests, multi-property management, and real-time communication makes it the clear choice for hospitality teams.
Asana offers a simple, flexible task management solution, suitable only if your hotel’s needs are limited to internal team coordination without the necessity of industry-specific tools. Its lack of hospitality integrations and features makes it less relevant for most hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes guest experience, operational efficiency, and dedicated support, Monscierge is the superior option. If the goal is internal project management and your team is comfortable handling customization, Asana may suffice but is less aligned with hospitality demands.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking to improve operational workflows and guest satisfaction, Monscierge’s comprehensive feature set and support make it the recommended platform.
Staff Collaboration Tools pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Asana and Monscierge (Connect Staff) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Inspection | ||
| Late checkouts | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Print old records | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| Team goal setting (e.g. rewards sign-ups, satisfaction) |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate the ability to customize the Apple TV experience with their property's branding, such as adding custom screensavers or tailored... Many users appreciate the ability to customize the Apple TV experience with their property's branding, such as adding custom screensavers or tailored apps. Some reviews, however, suggest that there are limitations to this customization and request additional features to make the interface even more user-friendly and aligned with their brand.
User reviews frequently praise the guest messaging and request features, highlighting how these tools streamline communication and improve overall eff... User reviews frequently praise the guest messaging and request features, highlighting how these tools streamline communication and improve overall efficiency. The guest messaging feature is particularly appreciated for reducing phone loads and enabling real-time responses. However, some reviews note that the interface could be made more intuitive for less tech-savvy guests.
Users appreciate the ability to provide guests with local recommendations directly on their Apple TVs and lobby screens. This feature helps in enhanci... Users appreciate the ability to provide guests with local recommendations directly on their Apple TVs and lobby screens. This feature helps in enhancing the guest experience by offering curated local information and events, reducing the need for front desk inquiries. Some users, however, note the desire for richer and more customizable content.
Where hoteliers push back
Apart from criticisms about loading speeds and customization, users also note occasional system crashes and bugs in the platform. Some reviews highlig... Apart from criticisms about loading speeds and customization, users also note occasional system crashes and bugs in the platform. Some reviews highlight the need for better training materials and more comprehensive support to alleviate these issues.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Asana and Monscierge (Connect Staff) share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. Asana offers 0 verified integration partners, while Monscierge (Connect Staff) offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Monscierge (Connect Staff) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Asana: No. Monscierge (Connect Staff): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Asana has an HT Score of 0 and Monscierge has 32. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor