The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ascon shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Ascon users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ascon |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. You’re evaluating Ascon by Ascon and Infor HMS by Infor—two offerings that aim to streamline hotel management but differ significantly in market presence, features, and user feedback. While both seek to optimize your property’s daily functions, their strengths and limitations dictate different suitability levels for your hotel.
Ascon is a small, less-known provider with limited reviews and no recent feedback, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts a substantial review base, recent positive feedback, and a broad feature set. The question becomes: which system offers the reliability and functionality your hotel needs now?
Both Ascon and Infor HMS aim to simplify property management, but their market presence and review data tell a different story. Ascon has no recent reviews and no user ratings, suggesting it’s either niche or not widely adopted, which raises questions about ongoing support and feature updates. In contrast, Infor HMS has 46 reviews in the last six months, with an overall score of 4.04/5, indicating active use and recent user satisfaction.
Infor’s higher rating and recent reviews suggest it is a more reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven system. Ascon’s lack of recent feedback leaves your team with uncertainty about its current performance and support quality. The key question is: do you want to invest in a system with a proven track record or a less tested platform?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS that integrates smoothly with booking platforms, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It is best suited for hotels looking to streamline operations across multiple departments with extensive automation and customization options. If your team values a system with a broad partner network and proven operational efficiency, Infor is the better fit.
Conversely, if your hotel is small, operates in a niche market, or requires a minimal solution without extensive integrations, Ascon might seem appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews and features, it’s unlikely to match Infor’s robustness. For most hotels aiming for measurable improvements, Infor’s established presence and user feedback make it the safer, more dependable choice.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 in ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive navigation and short onboarding processes. Users find it straightforward once they understand its layout, with many noting that its web-based interface offers flexibility on different devices.
Ascon, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, and no recent reviews to gauge its current usability. The absence of feedback makes it difficult to assess whether your team would find it user-friendly or cumbersome. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers a robust suite with 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, multi-lingual support, mobile app, cloud hosting, multi-currency, payment processing, revenue management, ancillary revenue tracking, and automated night audit.
Ascon, by comparison, has no documented unique features or integrations, limiting its functional scope. With no verified partners or modules, it’s unlikely to meet the operational needs of mid-to-large hotels. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts a 4.04/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews emphasizing its prompt, professional support team. Respondents appreciate how support staff guide them through issues quickly, especially during system updates or troubleshooting.
Ascon has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. This lack of feedback suggests limited community engagement or a smaller user base. For reliability and peace of mind, Infor’s support is the clear leader. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has an extensive partner network with 113 verified integrations, including booking engines like Booking.com and Expedia, revenue management tools, and operational modules like housekeeping and guest CRM.
Ascon has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and third-party services. If your hotel relies on multiple software platforms, Infor’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant advantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, hoteliers find Infor HMS generally effective for their needs. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and branded properties, rate it highly for operational efficiency and support.
Ascon, with no recent reviews or scores, cannot be reliably rated. This lack of feedback indicates that most hoteliers have not adopted or tested Ascon recently. For proven satisfaction, Infor is the stronger choice.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models. Infor HMS’s pricing is typically based on individual hotel needs, with no fixed subscription fee, and implementation is free of charge. Ascon’s pricing details are unavailable, which may suggest a bespoke or less transparent approach.
Since pricing transparency is crucial for budget planning, the lack of detailed costs favors Infor’s more transparent approach.
Given the limited features and no recent reviews, Ascon is best suited for very small properties or those testing basic management solutions.
Infor HMS suits mid-sized and larger hotels looking for a practical, integrated management system.
The core difference between Infor HMS and Ascon is the level of development, support, and feature set. Infor HMS offers a proven, broad platform with recent reviews confirming its effectiveness, while Ascon’s lack of current feedback raises concerns about ongoing support and functionality.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich, and well-supported system that integrates with your existing tech stack. It’s ideal for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and guest experience, especially if you operate in multiple markets.
If your hotel is very small, operates in a niche, or tests basic management solutions, Ascon might seem appealing initially. However, the absence of recent performance data and features makes it less suitable for hotels aiming for growth or modernization.
In conclusion, Infor HMS’s recent reviews, extensive features, support, and integrations make it the recommended choice for most hotels today. Ascon’s minimal data and lack of recent feedback position it as a less reliable option for hotels serious about operational excellence.
According to HTR's product database, Ascon and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ascon and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ascon offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ascon: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ascon has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor