The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ascon shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Ascon users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ascon |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #49 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing between Ascon by Ascon and Redforts by Redforts hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, your operational complexity, and your budget. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ substantially in maturity, features, and user reception. Ascon, with no recent reviews or ratings, appears to be an untested or inactive option, whereas Redforts boasts a clear, recent track record with over 40 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Are you comfortable betting on an unverified platform, or do you prefer a solution with proven reviews and active support?
Redforts is the more reliable choice for your hotel. With 40 recent reviews, a 4.68/5 ease of use score, and a 4.53/5 customer support rating, it clearly outperforms Ascon, which has no reviews or ratings. If your goal is a product with established user satisfaction, Redforts stands out as the better option.
Both Ascon and Redforts are designed to tackle property management and streamline operations, but they diverge sharply in their market activity and maturity. Ascon’s absence of recent reviews or verified ratings raises questions about its current viability or support presence, while Redforts actively maintains a robust user base with over 40 reviews in the last six months, indicating ongoing development and support. The lack of visible integrations, features, and recent feedback for Ascon further weakens its position as a contender. Are you willing to rely on an unverified system, or do you want a proven, supported platform with recent user input?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one system that covers reservations, channel management, and revenue management effectively, Redforts is the clear choice. Its suite of 46 features, including native email marketing, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting, cater to hotels looking for comprehensive management tools. Conversely, Ascon offers no visible features or integrations, making it suitable only if you’re exploring options with minimal current support or feature sets—an unlikely scenario if your goal is operational efficiency or growth.
Redforts excels in ease of use, scoring 4.68/5 based on recent reviews, with many users describing it as intuitive, simple to learn, and efficient. The platform’s modern interface and responsive customer support further enhance adoption, especially for teams that need quick onboarding. Ascon, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on usability, but the absence of feedback suggests it may lack the intuitive design and active support that makes Redforts stand out. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts presents a rich feature set with 46 functionalities, including revenue management, online payment, guest messaging, and integration with channel managers like Mr Winston and WuBook. In contrast, Ascon offers no documented features, integrations, or modules, limiting its appeal to basic or outdated management needs. For hotels aiming for automation, customer engagement, and revenue optimization, Redforts’ comprehensive toolset provides a decisive edge. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’ support scores 4.53/5, with many reviews citing their friendly, responsive, and effective customer service as a key benefit. Users mention quick response times and ongoing improvements, which foster trust and satisfaction. Ascon, with no recent reviews or active presence, provides no information on support quality, leaving uncertainty around its ability to assist or troubleshoot. Given the data, Redforts’ support is clearly more reliable. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts supports 2 verified integrations, namely with Mr Winston and WuBook, while Ascon reports no verified integrations or partner connections. These integrations simplify operations by connecting your PMS with channel managers or booking engines, critical for multichannel distribution. Without active integrations, Ascon’s utility diminishes significantly in a modern hospitality environment. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts has accumulated 40 recent reviews, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and a 4.68/5 ease of use score, reflecting strong user satisfaction across hotel segments like B&Bs, hostels, boutique hotels, and city center hotels. Ascon’s lack of reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction, but the absence suggests limited adoption or activity. For hotel managers seeking proven satisfaction, Redforts is the obvious choice. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts charges a straightforward $500 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial available, positioning it as a cost-effective solution considering its feature set. Ascon's pricing details are not available, and given its lack of recent reviews or public information, it’s likely either inactive or not competitively priced. For budget-conscious hotels seeking transparency, Redforts offers a clear, predictable cost structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Redforts is a proven, feature-rich property management system with active user reviews and high satisfaction scores. It excels in ease of use, customer support, integrations, and overall market presence, making it suitable for most mid-sized and larger properties seeking comprehensive management tools.
Ascon, on the other hand, has no recent reviews, documented features, or active support information. Its lack of recent activity and user feedback suggests it’s not a viable option for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency or growth. Unless you’re experimenting or operating a very small, simple property, Redforts should be your choice.
In conclusion, if you need a reliable, well-supported PMS with recent reviews and a proven track record, Redforts is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set, active support, and high user satisfaction make it the safer investment for your hotel’s operations. Conversely, Ascon’s limited and outdated profile makes it unsuitable for most modern hospitality management needs.
According to HTR's product database, Ascon and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ascon and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ascon offers 0 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ascon: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ascon has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor