The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Getaroom shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s success. Both ASI WebRes and Getaroom aim to streamline reservations, but they serve distinctly different needs. ASI WebRes, integrated within a comprehensive property management system, offers deep operational control and extensive features. Conversely, Getaroom is a standalone booking platform focused on consumer experience and wide inventory access. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
ASI WebRes is part of the larger ASI Property Management System, designed to help independent hotels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios manage reservations, channels, and operations in one platform. It boasts a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating based on 20 recent reviews, with glowing comments about its straightforward workflows and quick support, making daily management smoother.
Getaroom, with zero reviews and a lack of recent data, currently has no proven user feedback to support its effectiveness. Its core strength appears to be offering a broad inventory of hotel rooms globally and a simplified booking interface, but without recent reviews, its actual usability and reliability remain uncertain.
This leaves you to ask: which platform truly meets your operational needs and guest experience expectations?
If your hotel needs a full hotel management system that consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, billing, and distribution, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Its 20 recent reviews confirm high satisfaction, especially with its ease of use and support, making it ideal for independent properties or multi-property portfolios seeking operational control.
On the other hand, if your primary goal is online guest acquisition with a wide inventory and minimal integration complexity, Getaroom’s extensive hotel listings and user-focused booking experience might appeal—though the lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice for reliability right now.
Thus, for hotels prioritizing operational integration and proven customer satisfaction, ASI WebRes stands out. For those focusing on broad inventory access and a consumer-facing booking platform, Getaroom could be considered, but with caution.
ASI WebRes offers a highly rated 4.95/5 ease of use based on 20 recent reviews, with owners praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and support responsiveness. Users highlight how it simplifies daily operations, from reservations to housekeeping, with very few complaints.
Getaroom, with no available recent reviews, provides no clear data on user experience or ease of use. Its interface is described as streamlined in marketing materials, but without recent, verified feedback, its usability remains unconfirmed.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes packs in 27 features exclusive to it, including mobile optimization, special offers, multi-channel booking, Google and Tripadvisor integrations, multi-lingual support, flexible rates, and social media integration. These features cater to operational complexity and direct booking optimization, giving it a significant advantage.
Getaroom offers no documented features beyond basic booking functions, lacking the extensive operational and marketing tools that ASI WebRes provides. Its feature set appears minimal and less suited for comprehensive hotel management.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Based on recent reviews, ASI WebRes scores a 4.85/5 for customer support, with users describing the team as professional, courteous, and quick to resolve issues. One review states, "Technical issues are resolved immediately, support staff are knowledgeable and friendly."
Getaroom’s customer support information is limited, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality. Its support reputation remains unverified, making ASI WebRes the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes connects with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto, and integrates with social, analytics, and booking platforms. This extensive partner network enhances its flexibility for diverse hotel needs.
Getaroom offers a single verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its integration options. Without broader connectivity, it may not fit hotels requiring multi-channel or third-party system integrations.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews and a 4.95/5 ease-of-use score, ASI WebRes's user base of independent and multi-property hotels consistently praises its simplicity and support. Hotels in North America, South America, Asia Pacific, and other regions report high satisfaction levels.
Getaroom has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences at this time.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, suggesting they may require custom quotes based on property size and features. ASI WebRes’s value is reflected in its feature set and support quality, while Getaroom’s lack of transparency makes cost comparisons difficult.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, standalone booking platform without operational management features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep operational controls or proven support, especially given the lack of recent reviews.
ASI WebRes is a comprehensive hotel management and booking platform bolstered by a strong recent review base, high customer ratings, and extensive features. Its ability to unify reservations, distribution, billing, and guest management makes it suitable for independent hotels and multi-property groups aiming for operational efficiency.
Getaroom, despite its broad inventory and consumer-facing focus, currently lacks recent user feedback and detailed features, making it a less reliable choice right now. Its potential is evident, but without verified reviews, your hotel risks investing in unproven technology.
In summary, if your priority is a trusted, feature-rich booking engine integrated within a broader PMS, ASI WebRes is the clear leader. For hotels primarily seeking a straightforward, inventory-heavy booking platform and willing to accept the risk of limited recent validation, Getaroom might be considered—but caution is advised.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Getaroom |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and Getaroom share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and Getaroom share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while Getaroom offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. Getaroom: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and Getaroom has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property