The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 41 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Confirmation emails.
eRevMax shines , with exclusive features like Automated reporting and Urgency messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 41 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 20 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #34 4 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | #30 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #25 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | #19 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #45 1 reviews | #31 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #46 1 reviews | #27 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #33 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | #29 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | #28 1 reviews |
| Europe | — | #42 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | #19 4 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #4 10 reviews |
Choosing between ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. and RateTiger Booking Engine by eRevMax hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Both products aim to streamline your booking process, eliminate overbookings, and boost direct bookings, but they diverge in features, user experience, and market focus. ASI WebRes is part of a broader property management system with a strong emphasis on operational integration, while RateTiger specializes in channel management and online distribution. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s growth trajectory?
ASI WebRes and RateTiger both serve to improve online booking and distribution, but their core strengths differ. ASI WebRes, integrated within the ASI PMS, focuses on centralizing reservations, front desk tasks, and operational workflows, making it suitable for properties seeking a unified management platform. RateTiger emphasizes real-time channel distribution, rate synchronization, and marketing tools, making it ideal if your hotel prioritizes expanding online presence and multi-channel reach. Do your hotel’s needs lean more toward operational efficiency or distribution expansion?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management solution that combines reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and financials, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Its robust suite of features supports multi-property management and offers a centralized dashboard, perfect for independent hotels or those seeking operational unification. Conversely, if your focus is on maximizing online visibility through extensive channel connectivity and optimizing rates across multiple platforms, RateTiger’s 70+ integrations and marketing features make it the better fit. Your decision should depend on whether operational integration or distribution reach is your priority.
ASI WebRes scores a 4.95/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and seamless onboarding process. It offers a user-friendly experience that facilitates quick staff adoption, even for smaller teams. RateTiger, rated at 4.29/5, also garners praise for its ease of navigation and effective real-time updates but is slightly less favored for simplicity by users. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes boasts 11 features exclusive to its platform, including Tripadvisor Bookings, Google Hotel Ads, customizable rate plans, and wedding/corporate modules. It also provides detailed reporting, analytics, and multi-property management, making it a comprehensive operational tool. RateTiger offers 7 unique features like A/B testing, automated reporting, loyalty program integration, and urgency messaging, which cater more to marketing and distribution optimization. The total shared features (16) favor ASI WebRes’s broader operational scope. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Both products are well-supported, but ASI WebRes’s support scores a 4.85/5, with reviews highlighting fast, knowledgeable, and courteous assistance that resolves issues promptly. Users emphasize the ease of onboarding and ongoing support, making it highly reliable. RateTiger’s support, rated at 4.47/5, is praised for responsiveness and effective problem resolution but slightly less so than ASI. With more recent reviews and higher ratings, Edge: ASI WebRes.
RateTiger leads with 70 verified partners, including integrations with major PMS systems like Visual Matrix, and a wide array of OTAs, GDS, and channel partners. ASI WebRes has 19 verified integrations, including key partners like SiteMinder and Pricepoint, but is less extensive. If a broad, global distribution network is critical for your hotel, RateTiger is the clear winner. Edge: RateTiger.
While ASI WebRes has more recent reviews and a significantly higher overall rating (4.95/5 versus 4.29/5), it’s primarily rated by independent and mid-sized hotels across various segments. RateTiger’s reviews focus more on revenue growth and distribution benefits, with a slightly lower rating but high satisfaction among boutique and resort hotels. Given the recency and volume of reviews, ASI WebRes’s higher rating indicates greater user satisfaction. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models, typically offering custom quotes based on property size and needs. However, ASI WebRes’s value might be reflected in its integrated property management suite, while RateTiger’s costs can vary depending on the number of channels and features used. Expect to negotiate pricing with each vendor.
ASI WebRes offers a complete management ecosystem with a strong focus on operational workflows, making it ideal for properties seeking efficiency and integration. Its extensive user base and recent reviews confirm its reliability and ease of use, especially for independent and multi-property hotels aiming for streamlined operations.
RateTiger excels in distribution, channel management, and marketing tools, with a broad partner network that supports global reach. It’s best suited for hotels prioritizing online visibility, rate optimization, and ancillary sales, especially those with diverse distribution channels.
If your hotel values a unified platform with deep operational features and high user satisfaction, ASI WebRes is the preferable choice. If expanding your online presence, managing multiple channels, and optimizing rates matter most, RateTiger will serve you better.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a trusted, well-reviewed, and recent solution, ASI WebRes’s higher ratings and more recent reviews make it the safer bet. However, if distribution reach and channel connectivity are your top priorities, RateTiger’s extensive integrations and proven results support its selection.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability) | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Customizable add-ons | ||
| Flexible dates | ||
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Loyalty program integration | ||
| Price comparison widget | ||
| Rate plan comparisons | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) offers 70. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and eRevMax has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor