The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AsyaSoft shines .
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 328 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, AsyaSoft users most value its , while Clock users highlight feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 117 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 157 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 165 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #11 80 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #8 62 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #9 27 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #17 30 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 228 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 2 reviews |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and Clock PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, regional presence, and user experience. AsyaSoft’s lack of recent reviews and global reach puts its reliability into question, whereas Clock boasts a broad international footprint and over 250 recent reviews indicating high satisfaction. The critical question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s scale and sophistication?
If your hotel prioritizes a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and global support, Clock PMS clearly stands out. Conversely, if your hotel operates on a smaller scale or in a niche market without demanding advanced features, AsyaSoft might seem appealing, but its limited review data makes it a risky choice.
Both AsyaSoft and Clock aim to manage reservations, billing, and front desk operations, but Clock provides a more extensive suite of functionalities. AsyaSoft’s offerings appear minimal—lacking verified features, integrations, or a significant regional presence—making it hard to evaluate its true capabilities.
Clock, with its 58 unique features including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, and revenue tracking, offers a comprehensive toolset that can adapt to a variety of hotel types. Its recent reviews highlight operational improvements, time savings, and guest engagement, whereas AsyaSoft’s absence of recent feedback leaves its performance uncertain.
Would your hotel benefit from a robust, well-supported system with a proven track record? Or are you seeking a niche solution that may lack the scalability and support needed for growth?
Edge: Clock PMS.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable property management system with extensive integrations and international support, go with Clock. Its 251 reviews in the last six months and a 4.8/5 overall rating demonstrate high user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels.
If, however, your hotel operates on a very small scale or in a region where AsyaSoft’s presence is unchallenged, and you are willing to accept unverified support and limited features, you might consider AsyaSoft. Still, the lack of recent reviews and global presence significantly weaken its case.
For hotels seeking a proven, comprehensive system that grows with their property, Clock is the clear choice.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts a user rating of 4.78/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and simple onboarding process. Hoteliers emphasize how quickly staff can learn the system, leading to immediate operational gains.
AsyaSoft, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no concrete data on usability. Given its lack of visibility and user feedback, it’s impossible to determine if it provides a straightforward experience.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock clearly offers a far richer feature set with 58 exclusive functionalities, including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, revenue tracking, and mobile check-in. AsyaSoft, with no verified features, provides no tangible capabilities, making it impossible to match its scope to Clock’s.
The breadth of features in Clock enables hotels to automate workflows, improve guest engagement, and optimize revenue, outperforming AsyaSoft’s minimal profile. For any hotel aiming for operational efficiency, Clock’s features are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock receives a 4.75/5 rating in customer support, with recent reviews highlighting its responsive, proactive assistance and frequent updates. Users describe support as “quick and helpful,” which is vital when resolving operational issues.
AsyaSoft offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its customer support reputation unverified. The absence of recent feedback suggests potential uncertainty in support quality, which is critical for hotel operations.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock integrates with 111 verified partners, including popular tools like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and RevControl. Its open API and transparent connection fees facilitate smooth third-party integration.
AsyaSoft has zero verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems or revenue tools. Its lack of integration options makes Clock the better choice for hotels seeking a connected, automated operation.
Edge: Clock PMS.
With 251 recent reviews and a 4.8/5 rating, Clock is favored by a broad range of hotels, especially independent properties and boutique hotels, which rate it 4.83/5 and 4.84/5 respectively. Smaller, niche hotels appreciate its operational efficiency and support.
AsyaSoft, lacking recent reviews, cannot be rated legitimately. Without current user feedback, its perceived quality remains unverified, giving Clock the clear advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock charges a base fee of $600, with no hidden or additional costs, offering a clear pricing structure. AsyaSoft’s pricing is unavailable, and its lack of transparency raises questions about total costs and value.
Given the transparency and known cost of Clock, it provides better predictability for budgeting. AsyaSoft’s pricing opacity makes it difficult to evaluate ROI.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations, scalable features, or international support, as AsyaSoft’s capabilities are unverified and limited.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, operates in a niche market with minimal tech needs, or if budget constraints prohibit the $600 monthly fee.
Clock offers a complete, reliable, and highly rated hotel management system with a broad feature set and international support. Its recent reviews confirm high satisfaction and operational improvements, making it the logical choice for most hotels.
AsyaSoft’s lack of recent data and limited features make it a risky gamble, especially for properties looking to grow or improve operational efficiency. Unless your hotel is very small or in a specific region, Clock is the clear winner.
If you need a proven, feature-rich PMS with ongoing support and extensive integrations, Clock is the best option. For very small or budget-conscious properties without demanding operational needs, AsyaSoft may suffice—though it’s a less secure choice overall.
According to HTR's product database, AsyaSoft PMS and Clock PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AsyaSoft PMS and Clock PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. AsyaSoft PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Clock PMS offers 111. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AsyaSoft PMS: No. Clock PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AsyaSoft has an HT Score of 0 and Clock has 84. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor