The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AsyaSoft shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, AsyaSoft users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining your hotel’s operations. Both AsyaSoft PMS and Preno aim to handle reservations, billing, and guest management, but they diverge significantly in market presence, features, and user experience. While AsyaSoft struggles with reviews and regional adoption, Preno has established itself with strong ratings, numerous integrations, and a global footprint. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven usability and features or are open to exploring a less-reviewed platform.
Are you seeking a mature, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and proven scalability, or a simple, user-friendly solution with a strong support record? Let’s compare these two options side by side.
AsyaSoft PMS has been on the market for an undefined period and offers no reviews in the last six months, making its current standing uncertain. Conversely, Preno boasts 144 recent reviews with a high rating of 4.73/5, indicating active, satisfied users. While AsyaSoft has a zero overall rating and no recent reviews, Preno’s recent feedback highlights ease of use, support, and feature set.
Both products aim to address hotel management needs, but Preno’s recent review activity and high ratings suggest it’s more trusted today. Do you want a product with proven recent user satisfaction, or are you considering a lesser-known option with limited public feedback?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with extensive integrations, Preno is the clear choice. Its 30 exclusive features—including payment processing, channel management, guest CRM, and revenue management—cater to multi-property operations, making it ideal for hotels seeking automation and efficiency.
On the other hand, if your focus is on a simple, possibly on-premise or less-integrated system, AsyaSoft might seem appealing. Yet, given its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings, its suitability is uncertain. For hotels looking to grow or modernize, Preno’s feature depth and proven track record make it the stronger pick.
Preno’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.78/5, with reviews praising its intuitive, clean interface and straightforward onboarding. Many users mention that Preno is simple to learn, reducing staff training time and minimizing operational disruptions. In contrast, AsyaSoft’s user ratings are unavailable, and reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge its usability.
Given Preno’s recent reviews and high user satisfaction, it clearly leads on ease of use. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 features exclusive to its platform, including payment processing, online support, guest profiles, CRM, revenue management, a mobile app, and a booking engine. These functionalities support automation, multi-channel distribution, and guest engagement—core to modern hotel operations.
AsyaSoft provides no unique features and appears to lack the breadth of tools offered by Preno. Without documented features or recent reviews, AsyaSoft’s capabilities are questionable at best. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support is highly rated at 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, helpful, and responsive service. Hoteliers appreciate Preno’s proactive support team, often highlighting their quick response times and willingness to assist during onboarding and daily use.
AsyaSoft has no available support ratings or recent feedback, making support quality impossible to assess. Given Preno’s consistent praise and recent reviews, it clearly offers superior support. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, providing extensive options for financial, channel, and guest management. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual entry errors.
AsyaSoft, however, offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other essential tools. For a hotel seeking seamless connectivity and automation, Preno’s integration ecosystem is a decisive advantage. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.73/5, NPS 9.53/10) reflect strong satisfaction among users in various segments, including boutique hotels, motels, and resorts. The only hotel segment with lower or no ratings is boutique hotels, which have not been rated or reviewed recently.
AsyaSoft’s ratings are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews, it cannot be considered a trusted choice today. Clearly, Preno enjoys higher user approval. Edge: Preno.
AsyaSoft does not publicly specify its pricing model, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. Preno charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no mention of additional implementation fees or hidden charges.
The transparent pricing of Preno allows for better budget planning, making it the more predictable investment. Edge: Preno.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Preno is a cloud-based PMS with a robust feature set, recent positive reviews, and widespread integrations, making it a better fit for most hotels today. Its high ratings, active user base, and extensive functionality suggest it’s a reliable choice for growth-oriented properties.
AsyaSoft, with no recent reviews or ratings, remains a less certain option—likely suitable only for very simple operations or hotels with minimal tech expectations. If you seek a modern, well-supported system, Preno is the clear winner.
For hotels valuing proven performance, high user satisfaction, and extensive capabilities, Preno stands out. If your needs are extremely basic or budget-constrained, AsyaSoft might suffice, but it’s a risky choice without recent validation.
In summary, unless your hotel has minimal operational complexity, Preno is the safer, smarter investment—more features, better support, and more recent positive feedback make it the optimal choice.
According to HTR's product database, AsyaSoft PMS and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AsyaSoft PMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. AsyaSoft PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AsyaSoft PMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AsyaSoft has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor