The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Atom shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Atom users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Atom |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Atom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Atom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Atom |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly impact operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Atom by Atom and Zil Money aim to streamline digital payments, but they diverge sharply in their approach and market presence. Atom, with zero reviews and a minimal online footprint, appears untested and lacks recent user feedback, whereas Zil Money boasts over 50 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use and strong support. Are you willing to rely on a virtually unreviewed product or lean toward a well-reviewed platform?
Atom claims to offer payment processing but provides no public reviews, features, or pricing details, making it impossible to evaluate its effectiveness or reliability. In contrast, Zil Money has accumulated 54 reviews, primarily from hotel clients, with a high review volume in the last six months, providing current insights into performance and support. Zil Money’s reviews highlight ease of use, security, and a broad feature set, whereas Atom’s lack of reviews leaves its capabilities and customer satisfaction unverified.
Given the absence of customer feedback for Atom, your hotel cannot assess its performance or support quality. Zil Money’s recent positive reviews—averaging 4.5/5 for ease of use and customer support—cement its credibility. Are you comfortable trusting a tool with no user reviews versus one that’s proven with recent, high-rated feedback?
If your hotel needs a verified, feature-rich platform capable of handling multiple payment methods—like ACH, wire, eChecks, and credit cards—Zil Money should be your pick. Its extensive feature set (15 unique features) and high customer satisfaction make it suitable for hotels seeking operational reliability. Conversely, if your team values a straightforward payment processor with minimal setup and fewer features, Atom might seem appealing—but with zero reviews, you’d be relying on vendor claims alone.
For hoteliers prioritizing proven performance, Zil Money’s 87% likelihood to recommend and recent reviews indicating strong customer support and ease of use make it the more dependable choice. Atom, lacking any publicly available user feedback, cannot currently fulfill the criteria of a trusted SaaS provider.
Zil Money scores 4.5 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its straightforward interface and quick onboarding, often citing it as saving time and reducing complexity. Hotel staff report that the platform's intuitive design significantly speeds up payment processing and account management, making daily operations smoother.
Atom, on the other hand, has a score of 0/5 for ease of use, with no reviews or ratings to gauge user experience. Its lack of publicly available feedback means your team would need to trial or purchase blindly, risking onboarding delays and training challenges. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 distinct features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, and Payment Splitting—capabilities that are missing entirely from Atom. Its feature set caters to diverse payment needs, especially for international transactions and flexible payment options.
Atom provides no documented features, integrations, or capabilities, rendering it impossible to compare on functionality. Without verified features or user feedback, Zil Money’s well-rounded offering clearly provides more value. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s support receives high marks, with a 4.5/5 rating and reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users specifically mention that support staff resolve issues quickly and assist during onboarding, which enhances confidence in the platform.
Atom has a support rating of 0/5, with no reviews or publicly available support metrics, making it impossible to assess how well your team would be assisted post-purchase. Relying on an unreviewed product offers little reassurance. Edge: Zil Money.
Neither Atom nor Zil Money currently supports verified third-party integrations, with zero partners documented. Zil Money’s lack of integrations limits its flexibility, but its extensive feature set and recent reviews suggest ongoing development.
Atom’s absence of any integration information indicates it is unlikely to connect seamlessly with other hotel systems. Given the importance of integrated financial workflows, Zil Money’s current position remains stronger, though both are limited in this area. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s recent reviews reflect an 8.57/5 NPS score and an 87% likelihood to recommend, driven by ease of use, security, and support. Hotel segments like luxury and branded hotels frequently mention that Zil Money simplifies their payment workflows and boosts confidence in transactions.
Atom, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated or compared in terms of user satisfaction. Without customer feedback, the platform’s reputation remains unverified, making Zil Money the clear leader here. Edge: Zil Money.
Atom’s pricing details are unavailable; no pricing model or trial information is publicly disclosed. This opacity makes it challenging to compare value or budget fit.
Zil Money charges a flat fee of $400, with no free tier or trial, but offers a 15-day free trial and a comprehensive API. Its transparent pricing allows hotels to assess ROI more confidently. Given the lack of pricing info for Atom, Zil Money provides more clarity for decision-making.
Given Atom's lack of reviews and features, it’s best suited for experimental use rather than operational reliance.
Not ideal if your hotel operates exclusively with basic credit card payments and does not require advanced financial features.
Atom offers a conceptual payment processing solution with no public validation, making it unsuitable for operational deployment. Its lack of reviews or features suggests it is either untested or incomplete, posing significant risks.
Zil Money, with over 50 recent reviews, a high satisfaction score, and a broad feature set, is the safer, more proven platform. Its strengths lie in ease of use, customer support, and flexible payment options, making it suitable for most mid-sized to large hotels.
If your hotel needs a trusted, fully-featured payments platform that’s actively supported and reviewed, go with Zil Money. It provides the confidence and reliability your team needs to focus on guest experience rather than payment issues.
However, if your hotel is exploring options on a tight budget or just testing a new approach, and you’re willing to accept the risk of unverified performance, Atom might be a candidate—but only with a thorough internal trial.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking performance, support, and transparency, Zil Money clearly stands out as the better choice today.
According to HTR's product database, Atom and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Atom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Atom and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Atom offers 0 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Atom: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Atom has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor