The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ICSS shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, ICSS users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| ICSS |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | ICSS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | ICSS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | ICSS |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Atrium by ICSS and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both aim to manage your property operations, but they diverge significantly in their maturity, features, and market presence. Atrium, with no recent reviews or user feedback, appears to be a less proven option, while Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a large, recent review base and high user ratings. Which product aligns better with your operational goals?
Atrium by ICSS promises to optimize revenue management through advanced algorithms, but its lack of recent customer feedback and zero verified reviews raise questions about its current usability. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS offers a comprehensive, cloud-native platform with more than 30 recent reviews, making it a clearer choice based on proven performance and user satisfaction. Are you comfortable selecting a less tested system?
Atrium by ICSS is designed primarily as a revenue management system, focusing on pricing, demand forecasting, and profitability analytics. It intends to enhance your financial performance but appears to lack the broad operational features most hoteliers need day-to-day. Meanwhile, Shiji Daylight PMS provides a full suite of property management tools, from guest profiles and online check-in to detailed reporting and integrations, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types and sizes.
If your hotel prioritizes revenue optimization and has the technical capacity to implement specialized systems, Atrium might be a fit. However, for most hoteliers seeking a reliable PMS with robust operational capabilities, Shiji Daylight PMS’s proven track record and wide feature set make it the superior choice. Do you prefer a targeted revenue tool or an all-in-one management system?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich property management system with extensive integrations, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s ideal for hotels of all sizes, especially those looking to centralize operations, improve guest experience, and streamline workflows. If your primary focus is on revenue management with advanced analytics, Atrium could be considered but lacks recent user validation.
For properties requiring a modern, flexible PMS that supports multi-property management, automation, and detailed reporting, Shiji Daylight PMS stands out. On the other hand, if your hotel is experimenting with revenue-specific software and can manage limited operational tools, Atrium’s niche focus might be suitable. Are you seeking a comprehensive operational platform or a specialized revenue solution?
Shiji Daylight PMS earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.63 out of 5, backed by 32 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, onboarding process, and training materials. Users highlight how quickly new staff can learn to operate it and how its clarity reduces operational errors. Atrium, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no concrete evidence of usability, making it difficult to assess its learning curve or user experience.
Based on current feedback, Shiji’s interface and support resources significantly lower training time and adoption barriers. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers 98 distinct features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, payment processing, automated night audits, guest messaging, and more. These features enable comprehensive hotel management and guest engagement. Atrium’s feature set is not specified but appears to focus solely on revenue management tools, lacking the operational breadth needed for daily hotel functions.
With its extensive capabilities and integrations, Shiji Daylight PMS is clearly more feature-rich. Its broad toolset allows for a more complete management experience. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Group scores 4.53 out of 5 for customer support, with recent reviews citing helpful, responsive assistance that simplifies onboarding and troubleshooting. Reviewers appreciate the support team’s professionalism, noting it is a key factor in their positive experience. Atrium, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no verifiable support feedback, making it impossible to gauge support quality.
Given the positive recent reviews, Shiji’s support is a significant advantage for hotels needing dependable assistance. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts 64 verified integrations, including channel managers, payment providers, CRS, and marketing tools, enabling seamless operational workflows. It supports integrations with major partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Amadeus. Atrium, by contrast, has zero verified integrations, limiting its compatibility with other hotel systems.
If your hotel relies on a connected tech stack, Shiji’s extensive integrations ensure smoother data flow and automation. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS is rated 74.69 out of 100, with a 90% likelihood to recommend based on 32 recent reviews. Hoteliers across various segments praise its user-friendly design, detailed reporting, and support. In contrast, Atrium has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its reputation unverified.
The high, recent ratings of Shiji Daylight PMS demonstrate strong user satisfaction. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Atrium does not publicly disclose pricing, and there’s no available trial or subscription model. Shiji Daylight PMS charges a flat $1,200 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial info. Its transparent pricing enables easier budgeting and planning for your hotel.
While Atrium’s cost is unclear, Shiji’s clear fee structure makes it straightforward to evaluate ROI within your hotel’s operational budget.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a complete PMS or recent user validation of the system.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a very localized market with unique, region-specific requirements that the system doesn’t fully support yet.
The core difference lies in their scope and proven usability. Shiji Daylight PMS is a comprehensive, well-reviewed system that supports operational excellence and guest experience, while Atrium’s focus on revenue management alone, combined with a lack of recent validation, limits its appeal.
Choose Shiji Daylight PMS if you want a full-featured, scalable platform with high user satisfaction and extensive integrations. Opt for Atrium only if your hotel exclusively needs advanced revenue optimization and is willing to risk less proven technology.
For hotels seeking a reliable, widely adopted solution, Shiji Daylight PMS stands out as the clear winner. If your hotel’s primary concern is maximizing revenue with a specialized system, and you’re prepared for a less validated product, Atrium may be worth exploring, but with caution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| ICSS |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Atrium and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | ICSS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Atrium and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Atrium offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Atrium: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ICSS has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor