The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 77 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
Blastness shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Reporting Dashboard.
Side-by-side ratings based on 77 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 77 |
After analyzing 77 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Blastness users highlight professional assistance and support, data accessibility and flexibility, seamless system integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Professional Assistance and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Accessibility and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless System Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management Tools
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Intuitiveness Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 29 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 0 reviews | #2 42 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #15 0 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 0 reviews | #2 32 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #16 0 reviews | #2 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #5 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #18 0 reviews | #12 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 76 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #8 0 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software is critical for improving guest experience, increasing direct bookings, and streamlining operations. AutoClerk (mycrs) by AutoClerk, Inc. and Blastness CRS both aim to serve independent hotels but approach these goals differently. AutoClerk offers a longstanding property management foundation, while Blastness provides a feature-rich, revenue-focused reservation system. Which product will better meet your hotel's immediate needs?
AutoClerk has been around since 1985, primarily serving independent properties and hotel chains with a focus on integrated operational tools. Blastness, founded in 2004, emphasizes revenue management, digital marketing, and channel control for independent hotels. Both target similar markets but with different strengths. Are you looking for an all-in-one PMS or a dedicated reservation and revenue solution?
Blastness boasts over 70 reviews, with recent activity showing high satisfaction and a 99% likelihood to recommend. AutoClerk, in contrast, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its current effectiveness difficult to gauge. Given the active user base and recent positive feedback, Blastness currently stands out as the more reliable choice for hoteliers wanting proven results.
AutoClerk provides a comprehensive property management system with integrated revenue management, guest profiles, and extensive third-party connections. Blastness, however, offers a specialized CRS with advanced channel management, dynamic pricing, and marketing tools, tailored for independent hotels seeking growth. If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform that handles daily operations and guest management, AutoClerk might seem appealing. But if revenue growth, channel control, and digital marketing are priorities, Blastness clearly leads.
AutoClerk’s strengths lie in backend operational tools, making it suitable if your team values a familiar, broad system. Blastness’s focus on real-time pricing, marketing, and multi-channel management makes it ideal for hotels aiming to maximize revenue. Are you prioritizing operational integration or revenue optimization?
If your hotel is part of a management group or needs a reliable, full-service PMS with integrated bookings, AutoClerk is the safer bet. Its long history and extensive third-party integrations support complex operational needs. Conversely, if your hotel is independent and wants to grow direct bookings through sophisticated revenue strategies, Blastness offers a more targeted, feature-rich environment.
Hotels seeking a system with proven global presence and strong operational capabilities should lean toward AutoClerk. Those focusing on revenue maximization, channel control, and digital marketing should opt for Blastness. Which strategic goal aligns more with your hotel’s future?
AutoClerk’s interface and ease of use are rated at 0/5, with no recent reviews to suggest otherwise. Its onboarding experience is unverified, and the platform’s usability remains unknown. In contrast, Blastness scores an impressive 4.89/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive design and quick setup. Support staff are responsive, and users say training is straightforward.
Edge: Blastness.
AutoClerk offers basic property management features, guest profiles, and integrated revenue tools, but lacks the extensive feature set found in Blastness. Blastness provides 18 unique features, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, metasearch, dynamic pricing, booking rules, channel management, and mobile apps. Its feature count significantly surpasses AutoClerk’s, which has zero exclusive features.
Blastness’s suite enables comprehensive control over your distribution and revenue strategies. Edge: Blastness.
AutoClerk’s support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to assess their service quality. Blastness, however, boasts a 4.9/5 rating, with recent reviews emphasizing professional, prompt, and helpful support. Customers highlight ongoing training and immediate assistance during market shifts.
Given the active feedback, Blastness clearly leads in customer support. Edge: Blastness.
AutoClerk has 8 verified partners, including SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Akia. Blastness offers 15 verified integrations, including Duetto, Oracle Hospitality, and InnRoad, with several unique partners. Blastness’s larger partner network allows for broader connectivity and data flow.
For seamless operation across multiple platforms, Blastness’s higher integration count provides an advantage. Edge: Blastness.
AutoClerk has no recent reviews or ratings, making current user sentiment impossible to gauge. Blastness enjoys a 9.94/10 NPS score based on recent feedback, with users describing it as “a game-changer” and praising its revenue management and digital marketing capabilities.
Hotels valuing current, high-rated user satisfaction should favor Blastness. Edge: Blastness.
AutoClerk’s pricing information is not publicly available, suggesting custom quotes or enterprise-level pricing. Blastness charges a base fee of $600 monthly, with no mention of setup fees or additional costs.
For budget-conscious hotels evaluating straightforward costs, Blastness’s transparent pricing helps. AutoClerk’s unclear pricing makes it less predictable.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily seeks revenue growth tools or channel management. AutoClerk may lack the modern marketing features that newer systems offer.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, minimal system or if you need a traditional PMS without revenue management features.
AutoClerk’s core appeal is its extensive operational scope and stability, making it suitable for larger properties or management groups that need a comprehensive PMS. Its lack of recent reviews and unclear pricing diminish its attractiveness for hotels wanting current, actionable data.
Blastness, by contrast, excels in delivering a modern, revenue-driven reservation platform with high user satisfaction and proven success stories. Its focus on digital marketing, dynamic pricing, and channel control makes it a top choice for independent hotels aiming for measurable growth.
If your hotel needs a trusted, operational foundation with broad integrations, AutoClerk could work, but beware of the limited recent feedback. For hotels seeking aggressive revenue growth and satisfied, active users, Blastness clearly outperforms and offers a more reliable, data-backed platform today.
This comparison aims to help you make an informed decision based on current data, user feedback, and your hotel’s strategic priorities.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (mycrs) and Blastness CRS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| RMS connectivity | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate respons... Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate responses to changes in the market.
Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and... Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and adjustments.
Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enh... Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enhancing daily operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigati... While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigation and user experience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (mycrs) and Blastness CRS share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (mycrs) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Blastness CRS offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness CRS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (mycrs): No. Blastness CRS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Blastness has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor