The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 50 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Avalon shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Revenue pacing and Food & Beverage Reporting, Analysis & Forecasting.
Mediahawk shines , with exclusive features like Business & marketing plans and Centralized user & role management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 50 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 50 | 0 |
After analyzing 50 verified reviews, Avalon users most value its visualization and dashboard quality, customizable reports, user-friendly interface, while Mediahawk users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Visualization and Dashboard Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizable Reports
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Data Accuracy
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Business Intelligence vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #10 20 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 21 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 9 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 20 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #10 4 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #15 1 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 45 reviews | — |
When choosing a business intelligence (BI) tool, your hotel aims to turn data into actionable insights that improve revenue and operational efficiency. Avalon Analytics and Mediahawk both serve this purpose—Avalon with its comprehensive analytics platform and Mediahawk with its focus on call tracking data. While Avalon offers a broad suite of features designed specifically for hotels, Mediahawk specializes in marketing attribution via call tracking. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Avalon Analytics is the more established product, boasting a high volume of recent reviews, a 4.94/5 overall rating, and a dedicated user base. Mediahawk’s lack of reviews and recent activity make it less proven in the hospitality sector, despite its niche focus. Do you need an all-encompassing BI platform or a specialized marketing tool?
Avalon Analytics is built specifically for hotels seeking a broad, integrated view of their data. It consolidates PMS data, offers detailed segmentation, and provides automated reporting—features that aim to simplify revenue management and operational decision-making. Conversely, Mediahawk's core competency is call attribution, revealing which marketing channels generate phone inquiries and bookings.
Avalon’s platform is designed to reduce manual reporting work, speed up decision-making, and enable easy sharing of insights across teams. Mediahawk, however, focuses on optimizing marketing spend by tracking the source of phone calls, helping hotels understand their channel performance. Are you looking for a detailed operational and revenue analytics tool or a marketing attribution solution?
Avalon’s strengths lie in real-time dashboards, KPI visualization, and multi-property management—features that support strategic decisions at large or complex hotels. Mediahawk’s strengths are in call routing, analytics, and channel attribution, which are more useful for marketing teams or hotels heavily reliant on phone reservations. Would your team benefit more from comprehensive BI or targeted marketing insights?
Avalon’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use—rated 4.8/5—along with its ability to automate reports and centralize data. Mediahawk’s lack of recent reviews makes assessing its usability difficult, but its focus on call tracking suggests a narrower application. For overall confidence, Avalon’s high review volume and recent positive feedback make it the stronger choice. Is your priority a proven, hotel-specific BI platform?
If your hotel needs a full-suite BI platform that provides real-time insights, customizable reports, and portfolio management, Avalon is the clear winner. Its features include automated reporting, data centralization, and detailed segmentation, all backed by recent, positive reviews from nearly 50 users.
If your primary goal is to understand which marketing channels drive bookings—especially phone inquiries—Mediahawk offers valuable call tracking insights. However, with no recent reviews or reported hotel-specific features, its utility for hotel revenue management is limited.
Avalon is best suited for hotels looking to optimize overall performance, reduce manual reporting, and make data-driven decisions at scale. Mediahawk is more appropriate for teams focused on marketing attribution and channel optimization, particularly for properties heavily reliant on phone reservations.
Avalon’s user interface is consistently rated 4.8/5, praised for its intuitive dashboards and straightforward reporting capabilities. Users mention that the system reduces workload and speeds decision-making, with onboarding rated 4.61/5, indicating a smooth implementation process.
Mediahawk’s ease of use is unverified due to a lack of recent reviews, and it does not provide detailed usability ratings. Its focus on call tracking suggests a simpler, more niche interface, but without recent user feedback, it's difficult to confirm.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon offers a suite of 16 shared features, including automated reporting, data centralization, detailed segmentation, and unique functionalities like revenue pacing, F&B reporting, forecasting lock workflows, and in-app data management. Mediahawk provides only 3 unique features—business & marketing plans, centralized user management, and alerts feed.
Avalon’s features directly support hotel revenue management, operational insights, and multi-property analysis. Mediahawk’s features revolve around marketing channel optimization, which may be less relevant for your core operational needs. Avalon’s broader set of features makes it the more comprehensive hotel BI solution.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon’s support ratings are high—4.65/5—coupled with an average NPS of 9.43/10—indicating strong customer satisfaction. Users praise the support team for valuable expertise and quick assistance, essential for ongoing data management and troubleshooting.
Mediahawk has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making it hard to assess its customer service quality. Given Avalon’s proven support track record and positive feedback, it clearly has the edge.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon integrates with six verified partners, including major PMS and property tech providers like RMS, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Infor, Access Hospitality, and HOTELTIME. These integrations allow for real-time data exchange, simplifying reporting workflows.
Mediahawk has no verified integrations listed, which limits its interoperability with hotel management systems. For a smooth data flow and streamlined operations, Avalon’s extensive integration options make it the superior choice.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon’s hotel user rating is 4.94/5 based on 47 recent reviews, with many praising its ease of use, comprehensive insights, and real-time data. Hotels across segments, especially branded and resort properties, rate Avalon highly for its value and support.
Mediahawk, lacking recent reviews, has no available ratings from hotels. Without recent user feedback, Avalon’s proven high satisfaction scores make it the clear leader for hotel users.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon’s pricing starts at $300/month, with no freemium options, free trials, or tiered plans detailed publicly. Mediahawk’s base price is $200/month, similarly without a free trial or tiered structure.
While Avalon’s higher price may reflect its comprehensive features, its value is supported by high satisfaction scores and extensive integrations. Mediahawk’s lower cost could appeal to smaller teams, but its limited hotel-specific functionality makes investment less certain.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Avalon is a comprehensive, hotel-specific BI platform with a proven track record, high user satisfaction, and a broad feature set. Its ability to centralize data, automate reporting, and support multi-property management makes it suitable for mid to large-sized hotels seeking strategic insights.
Mediahawk offers targeted call tracking and marketing attribution, valuable in specific contexts but unproven in recent hotel-specific use. Its narrow focus and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable as a core BI solution for most hotels.
If your goal is to gain holistic, actionable insights across your hotel portfolio, Avalon is the clear choice. For marketing teams prioritizing call attribution, Mediahawk can complement existing tools but shouldn’t replace a dedicated BI platform.
According to HTR's product database, Avalon Analytics and Mediahawk share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Alerts Feed | ||
| Business & marketing plans | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Flexible Portfolio Grouping | ||
| Food & Beverage Reporting, Analysis & Forecasting | ||
| Forecast Locking & Workflows | ||
| In-App Data Management | ||
| Other Income Forecasting, Reporting & Analysis | ||
| Revenue pacing |
What hoteliers love
The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identify... The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identifying trends, outliers, and strategic insights, making the data easier to understand at a glance.
Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is part... Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for multi-property management and adapting to unique business requirements, reducing the manual workload.
The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The d... The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The dashboards are simple yet powerful, aiding in faster and more efficient data interpretation.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and comp... Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and complicate the decision-making process, requiring frequent interactions with Avalon’s support team for corrections.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Avalon Analytics and Mediahawk share many core Business Intelligence features, but each has unique capabilities. Avalon Analytics offers 6 verified integration partners, while Mediahawk offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Avalon Analytics leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Avalon Analytics: No. Mediahawk: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Business Intelligence vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Avalon has an HT Score of 21 and Mediahawk has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor