The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 516 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
BOOKONLINE NOW shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 516 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 4 |
After analyzing 516 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while BOOKONLINE NOW users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | #42 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | #38 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. Both SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and BOOKONLINE NOW aim to boost direct bookings, but they do so with very different levels of maturity and capabilities. SHR Group’s product offers a comprehensive set of features, extensive integrations, and a strong industry presence, whereas BOOKONLINE NOW remains a less-reviewed, simpler solution with limited market reach. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Both products tackle the core problem of increasing direct bookings and reducing reliance on OTAs. SHR Group’s BE excels in providing a feature-rich platform with advanced tools like A/B testing, personalized messaging, and multiple payment options, targeting hotels seeking a deep, customizable experience. Conversely, BOOKONLINE NOW focuses on straightforward integration and ease of use but offers limited features, fewer integrations, and a small user base. Do you need a robust, scalable system or a simple, quick-to-deploy solution?
If your hotel is looking for a feature-dense platform with advanced revenue management tools, extensive integrations, and a proven track record in large and mid-sized properties, SHR Group is the clear choice. Its 339 reviews and an overall rating of 4.86/5, along with a recent NPS of 9.53/10, reflect high user satisfaction and ongoing support. For smaller properties or those seeking a minimal setup, BOOKONLINE NOW might seem tempting, but with only 4 reviews and no recent feedback, its reliability and scalability are uncertain.
In summary, choose SHR Group if you prioritize depth and proven industry success, but consider BOOKONLINE NOW only if your needs are extremely simple and your property is very small.
SHR Group’s platform has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.67/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and helpful support teams. Users also highlight its detailed reporting tools and straightforward management features, though some admit the backend can be complex initially. BOOKONLINE NOW’s interface scores 3.5/5, and reviews suggest it feels outdated, with limited usefulness and a steep learning curve for new users.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s platform delivers 46 dedicated features, including mobile optimization, A/B testing, special offers, multi-lingual options, and comprehensive reporting. In contrast, BOOKONLINE NOW offers no unique features beyond basic booking capabilities, which is reflected in its limited review feedback and small feature set. The extensive feature list of SHR BE allows for more tailored and strategic revenue growth, whereas BOOKONLINE NOW’s simplicity might limit long-term scalability.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s customer support scores an impressive 4.86/5, with reviews praising the responsiveness, proactive guidance, and account management from their support team. Clients like Windward Management and Woodlands Hotel commend their ongoing assistance and strategic advice. BOOKONLINE NOW’s support support ratings are not available, but the limited reviews and negative comments about the backend suggest support may be less comprehensive or responsive.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified partners, including major PMS, channel management, and marketing integrations, enabling seamless operations. Conversely, BOOKONLINE NOW has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools, which could hinder operational efficiency for larger properties. If integrations are vital, SHR Group’s extensive network offers a real advantage.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
With 339 reviews and a 4.86/5 overall rating, SHR Group’s booking engine is highly regarded, especially by mid-sized and larger hotels across multiple segments, including boutique, city center, and resort properties. Its recent reviews reinforce confidence in its support and features. BOOKONLINE NOW, with only four reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks sufficient positive feedback or recognition from the hotel industry, making SHR the more trusted choice.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Pricing details for SHR Group are not publicly available but are likely customized based on hotel size and needs. They do not offer a freemium or trial model, indicating a premium product. BOOKONLINE NOW’s pricing is also undisclosed, but with a limited feature set and no reviews, its value proposition appears less clear. Expect SHR to be a more substantial investment in return for its robust feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between the two solutions lies in their complexity and market maturity. SHR Group offers a comprehensive, high-performance booking engine supported by a large user base and a proven track record, making it ideal for hotels aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Choose SHR Group if you want a platform with a proven reputation, extensive integrations, and a broad feature set that supports revenue optimization. Its 339 reviews and top-tier ratings confirm its reliability and ongoing support.
Opt for BOOKONLINE NOW only if your property is very small, your needs are minimal, and you’re looking for a quick, low-cost booking solution. Its very limited reviews and lack of recent feedback make it a riskier choice for hotels seeking scalable growth.
In conclusion, the better choice for most hotels today is SHR Booking Engine, especially considering its strong industry reputation, comprehensive features, and positive user feedback. Its ability to support both small and large properties in increasing direct bookings and streamlining operations makes it the more dependable option.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and BOOKONLINE NOW share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and BOOKONLINE NOW share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while BOOKONLINE NOW offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. BOOKONLINE NOW: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and BOOKONLINE NOW has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor