SHR Booking Engine (BE) vs. CENTROTEL: Which Is Right for You?

Updated May 16, 2026  ·  512 verified reviews analyzed

TLDR

We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.

CENTROTEL shines .

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does SHR Booking Engine (BE) Compare to CENTROTEL?

Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

HTScore
46
0
Likelihood to Recommend
96%
0%
Ease of Use
4.7/5
0.0/5
Customer Support
4.9/5
0.0/5
Value for Money
4.6/5
0.0/5
Starting Price Contact sales Contact sales
Verified Reviews 512 0

What Are the Pros and Cons of SHR Booking Engine (BE) vs CENTROTEL?

After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while CENTROTEL users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL
Pros
+ Proactive customer support
+ Integration capabilities
+ Intuitive interface
+ Rate and inventory management
Cons
Backend navigation improvements
Visual and aesthetic design
Support documentation and training

SHR Group vs CENTROTEL: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL
Small (10-24 rooms) #8 76 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #2 369 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) #4 39 reviews
X-Large (200+ rooms) #5 16 reviews

By Property Type

Segment SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL
Boutique #3 232 reviews
Luxury #2 320 reviews
Branded / Chain #2 166 reviews
Extended Stay #4 32 reviews

By Region

Segment SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL
North America #8 39 reviews
Europe #2 440 reviews
Asia Pacific #15 11 reviews
Middle East #16 3 reviews

The Decision

Choosing the right booking engine is critical to increasing your direct bookings and revenue. SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group offers a well-established solution with a high volume of recent reviews, while CENTROTEL presents itself as a less documented alternative, with no available recent reviews or ratings. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns more with your hotel’s needs for usability, features, support, and regional presence.

Is SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL Better for Hotels?

Both SHR BE and CENTROTEL aim to enhance your direct booking capabilities, but they diverge in maturity and support. SHR BE is a mature product with over 339 reviews in the last six months, boasting an overall rating of 4.86/5, indicating high satisfaction among hoteliers. CENTROTEL has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness or reliability.

The key difference is that SHR BE provides a comprehensive suite of features, including advanced rate management, personalization, and multi-channel integrations, backed by strong customer support. CENTROTEL, on the other hand, lacks publicly available user feedback and detailed feature listings, leaving your hotel uncertain about its capability and support quality. Do you prioritize proven performance or are you open to a less documented solution?

SHR Booking Engine vs CENTROTEL: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a tried-and-true booking engine that has demonstrated success across various segments, especially in North America and Europe, SHR BE is the clear choice. It’s ideal for properties looking to maximize direct bookings through features like A/B testing, special offers, and multi-language support, with a track record of high customer satisfaction.

If your hotel is in a highly niche market or you’re considering an emerging platform with limited public feedback, CENTROTEL might appeal, but without recent reviews or a proven track record, it’s a risk. For hotels seeking assurance from a well-rated platform, SHR BE’s extensive review base and recent performance data make it the safer investment.

Is SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL Easier to Use?

SHR BE scores 4.67/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and helpful support team. Customers highlight the platform’s helpful onboarding process, with feedback noting that staff find it easy to adopt and manage.

CENTROTEL offers no publicly available ratings or reviews, which makes assessing usability impossible. Given the lack of recent feedback, it’s reasonable to assume its user experience remains unverified. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.

Which Has Better Features: SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL?

SHR BE boasts 46 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, multi-lingual, multi-currency support, loyalty integration, and more. These tools directly influence booking conversions and revenue growth.

CENTROTEL currently lacks a publicly available feature list or comparative data. Without such details, it’s impossible to confirm if it offers the same breadth of functionality. Based on available data, SHR BE’s extensive feature set clearly outstrips CENTROTEL. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.

Which Has Better Customer Support: SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL?

SHR BE receives a 4.86/5 rating for customer support, with reviews emphasizing the proactive, helpful, and knowledgeable nature of their support team. Customers consistently mention their account managers and technical support as invaluable in optimizing platform use and resolving issues swiftly.

CENTROTEL offers no available support ratings or reviews, leaving uncertainty about its responsiveness and quality. Given the importance of reliable support for booking engines, SHR BE’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.

Which Has More Integrations: SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL?

SHR BE integrates with 81 verified partners, including major PMS, channel management, and marketing platforms like Criton, Profitroom, and OpenHotel. This extensive ecosystem enhances your ability to connect seamlessly with existing systems and expand functionality.

CENTROTEL lacks publicly disclosed integration data or verified partner connections. Without confirmed integrations, it’s difficult to assess whether CENTROTEL can meet your hotel’s operational needs. SHR BE’s proven integration network provides a significant advantage. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: SHR Booking Engine or CENTROTEL?

SHR BE’s 339 recent reviews focus on properties across segments like luxury, boutique, and city center hotels, with an overall rating of 4.86/5. Hoteliers highlight its effectiveness in boosting direct bookings, ease of use, and excellent support, with many reviews from the last six months.

CENTROTEL has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or hotel segment performance. For a proven track record backed by current user feedback, SHR BE clearly leads. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.

How Much Do SHR Booking Engine and CENTROTEL Cost?

Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly disclosed. SHR BE’s pricing model appears to be customized, with no mention of a freemium or subscription fee, while CENTROTEL’s costs are also undisclosed. Your hotel will need to contact vendors directly for quotes.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SHR Booking Engine?

  • Hotels that want a proven, feature-rich booking engine to increase direct bookings.
  • Properties seeking advanced rate management and personalization tools.
  • Hotels aiming for seamless integration with existing PMS and marketing systems.
  • Properties in need of strong customer support and onboarding services.
  • Hotels that value detailed reporting and data insights.

Not ideal if your hotel operates in a highly niche market with no need for extensive features or integration, or if you prefer a platform with limited regional presence.

What Type of Hotel Should Use CENTROTEL?

  • Hotels interested in a telecommunications management system with some AI-driven insights.
  • Businesses that prefer a simpler setup without extensive feature requirements.
  • Hotels in regions where CENTROTEL has a strong local presence or strategic partnership.
  • Hotels seeking a platform with minimal upfront costs (if pricing aligns).

Not ideal if your hotel demands a comprehensive booking engine with proven user reviews, extensive integrations, and a strong support reputation.

SHR Booking Engine vs CENTROTEL: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in proven performance: SHR BE is a high-rated, feature-rich booking engine with a large user base and recent reviews, providing confidence in its capabilities. CENTROTEL, lacking recent feedback and detailed features, poses more risk without evidence of effectiveness.

Choose SHR BE if your priority is reliability, extensive features, and support based on current, real-world user data. Its high satisfaction ratings and integration ecosystem make it a clear choice for hotels looking to grow their direct bookings.

Opt for CENTROTEL only if your hotel is comfortable with less publicly available information, or if you’re exploring options outside of traditional booking engines. Even then, the lack of recent reviews makes certainty difficult.

In summary, SHR Booking Engine offers the proven, comprehensive solution you need to enhance your direct booking strategy today.

How Much Do SHR Booking Engine (BE) and CENTROTEL Cost?

Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL

Which Features Does SHR Booking Engine (BE) Have That CENTROTEL Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and CENTROTEL share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature SHR Group SHR Group CENTROTEL
A/B testing & optimization
Mobile optimized/responsive
Pooled inventory
Pre-stay emails
Special offers & discounts
Urgency messaging

Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.

Real-World Results: SHR Group vs CENTROTEL by Business Goal

We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.

Increase Revenue & Reduce Costs
SHR Group Windward Management Mid-Size
+ The paid campaigns accounted for 26% of all traffic to the website
+ Google Search Ads showed a return on investment of 131 :1
+ Metasearch return on investment was 58:1

"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."

Stephen Williams
Stephen Williams
Group Sales and Marketing Director
CENTROTEL

No published case study for this goal yet.

SHR Group vs CENTROTEL: The Bottom Line

SHR Group
SHR Group
4.8/5 from 512 reviews

What hoteliers love

Proactive customer support 97% positive

Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.

Integration capabilities 71% positive

A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.

Intuitive interface 88% positive

Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.

Where hoteliers push back

Backend navigation improvements 56% negative

Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.

Visual and aesthetic design 50% negative

Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.

Unique capabilities

Mobile optimized/responsive A/B testing & optimization Urgency messaging Special offers & discounts Pooled inventory
4.7/5 ease of use 4.9/5 support 81 integrations
Visit Profile
CENTROTEL
0.0/5 from 0 reviews
0.0/5 ease of use 0.0/5 support 0 integrations
Visit Profile

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating SHR Group 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
Ease of Use SHR Group 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Customer Support SHR Group 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
Value for Money SHR Group 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Onboarding SHR Group 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)

Frequently Asked Questions About SHR Booking Engine (BE) vs CENTROTEL

Can SHR Booking Engine (BE) replace CENTROTEL?

It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and CENTROTEL share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while CENTROTEL offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do SHR Booking Engine (BE) or CENTROTEL offer a free plan?

SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. CENTROTEL: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank SHR Booking Engine (BE) and CENTROTEL?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and CENTROTEL has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group Weight What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews

How highly do users recommend this product?

Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories

The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.

Partner Ecosystem

How highly do tech partners recommend this company?

Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality

Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.

Customer Centricity

How customer-centric is this organization?

Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness

Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.

Reach, Staying Power & Resources

How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing?

Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score

Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →

Get personalized product recommendations

Product recommendations advisor

Ghostel icon

Let´s lookup your hotel information