The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
jetstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 0 |
After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while jetstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
jetstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
jetstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
jetstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
jetstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
Choosing between SHR Booking Engine by SHR Group and jetstar hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for a booking platform. While SHR Group’s solution targets the broader hospitality industry with extensive features and proven performance, jetstar appears to be an airline-focused revenue management system with limited hotel-specific information. The decision is clear: your hotel should prioritize a platform designed to optimize direct bookings and guest experience, especially considering the more comprehensive review data and recent user feedback.
Based on the volume of recent reviews and higher overall ratings, SHR Booking Engine is the superior choice for hotels in search of a reliable, feature-rich, and well-supported booking system. jetstar’s lack of hotel-specific reviews and minimal feature detail place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking a proven, user-rated booking engine. If your goal is to drive direct reservations and improve operational efficiency, SHR’s platform is the clear leader.
SHR Booking Engine is designed explicitly for the hospitality industry, offering features tailored to hotel needs such as multi-lingual options, rate management, and integrations with numerous hotel systems. Conversely, jetstar’s primary focus appears to be airline revenue management, with no hotel-specific features or recent reviews to back its effectiveness for your property. Both platforms aim to optimize revenue, but SHR provides a more comprehensive, hotel-centric solution supported by extensive user feedback.
The core difference is in their target markets and feature depth. SHR offers 46 unique features focused on hotel bookings, while jetstar provides no hotel-specific functionalities. The reviews for SHR are recent, plentiful, and highly positive, unlike jetstar’s nonexistent recent hotel reviews. Would you prefer a platform with proven hotel success, or one primarily built for airlines?
If your hotel needs a booking engine that offers extensive customization, multi-channel integrations, and features geared toward increasing direct bookings, SHR is the clear choice. Its platform has been praised for its ease of use, robust reporting, and ability to increase revenue through features like special offers, multi-currency support, and booking abandonment recapture.
On the other hand, if your focus is airline ticket sales or you’re seeking a system solely for revenue management based on demand prediction and pricing optimization, jetstar’s platform might be relevant. However, given the lack of hotel-specific data, SHR’s extensive feature set and proven hotel-centric performance make it the better fit for most hoteliers.
SHR Booking Engine scores a 4.67/5 in ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Customers praise its simple navigation, helpful onboarding process rated at 4.63/5, and positive support experiences—highlighted by an overall support rating of 4.86/5. Reviewers note that the platform is easy for staff to adopt and manage, even with complex features.
In contrast, jetstar’s interface and usability are not documented or reviewed extensively for hotel use. Without recent reviews or user ratings, it’s difficult to assess its ease of use for hospitality purposes. Given the detailed feedback for SHR, it’s clear that the platform is more user-friendly for hotels.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Booking Engine boasts 46 features designed specifically for hotels, including mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, pooled inventory, multi-lingual support, multi-currency options, and booking abandonment tools. It also offers integrations with prominent PMS and channel management systems, along with marketing and analytics tools.
jetstar provides no hotel-specific features or comparable functionalities documented in the source material. Its features are tailored toward airline revenue management, not hotel bookings. The extensive feature count and hotel-oriented tools firmly give SHR the edge.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.86/5 rating and consistent praise for proactive, helpful assistance. Review quotes commend the support team’s responsiveness, knowledgeable advice, and effective onboarding, which many hotel users find invaluable.
jetstar has no recent reviews or user feedback about customer support or onboarding for hotels. Without support ratings or testimonials, SHR’s support infrastructure clearly surpasses jetstar’s, especially for a hotel environment.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR’s platform connects with 81 verified partners, including PMS, revenue management, and digital marketing tools, offering extensive integration options. Shared integrations include Criton, Priority Software, and OpenHotel, with the ability to connect with most major hospitality systems.
jetstar offers no documented integrations or partner connections relevant to hotel operations. Its limited or nonexistent integration data makes SHR the obvious choice for hotels needing seamless system connectivity.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR’s platform has received 339 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.86/5 and a NPS score of 9.53/5, indicating high satisfaction. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, city center, and resort—rate it highly, with many reviews praising its features, support, and results.
jetstar has no recent reviews or ratings from hotel users. Given the recent, high-volume feedback for SHR, it’s clearly the more trusted and well-rated choice for hoteliers.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Pricing details for SHR are not publicly available, but it offers a pay-as-you-go model without implementation fees or freemium options. jetstar also does not disclose pricing, suggesting a possible custom quote or limited market for hotel use.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should focus on features, support, and proven performance rather than cost alone. SHR’s extensive capabilities and positive reviews imply a strong value proposition.
The fundamental difference is that SHR Booking Engine is a hotel-specific platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user ratings. jetstar appears to be an airline-focused revenue management tool with no recent hotel reviews or demonstrated hotel functionality.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine to increase direct bookings and optimize revenue, SHR is the recommended choice. It offers more integrations, better support, and a proven user base, making it the better investment for most hoteliers.
Choose SHR if your priority is a flexible, well-supported solution that consistently earns high satisfaction scores. If your focus is airline seat inventory and demand management, then jetstar might be suitable—but for hotels, SHR’s platform better suits your core needs.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and jetstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
jetstar |
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and jetstar share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while jetstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. jetstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and jetstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor