The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 227 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines when it comes to customer and account management — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like E-commerce consulting.
Fornova shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like Marketing dashboard.
Side-by-side ratings based on 227 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 223 | 4 |
After analyzing 227 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its customer and account management, booking engine performance and revenue increase, seo/ppc campaigns and digital marketing, while Fornova users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer and Account Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Performance and Revenue Increase
▾
|
|
|
+
SEO/PPC Campaigns and Digital Marketing
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Usability
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Visual Design and Aesthetic Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Metasearch Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 29 reviews | #15 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 173 reviews | #14 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 15 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #14 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 98 reviews | #12 3 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 142 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 72 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 8 reviews | #14 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 7 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #1 203 reviews | #15 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 6 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | #3 2 reviews | #4 0 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel metasearch management software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—whether you prioritize extensive partner integrations, advanced marketing tools, or ease of use. Both SHR Meta Search by SHR Group and FornovaEC aim to boost your direct bookings and streamline your digital visibility, but they approach these goals differently. With SHR Group's proven track record and broader regional presence, it’s important to examine which platform aligns best with your hotel’s operations. Are you ready to find out which solution stands out?
SHR Meta Search by SHR Group offers a comprehensive suite tailored to hotels seeking to maximize their metasearch visibility and reduce OTA dependency. Its core strength lies in its extensive partner network, with 81 verified integrations, and its focus on continuous monitoring and bid management across channels like Google Hotel Price Ads, Trivago, TripAdvisor, and others. In contrast, FornovaEC emphasizes automating digital marketing campaigns and increasing conversion rates through detailed market intelligence and programmatic advertising, with only 8 verified partners. Do you need broad distribution reach or targeted marketing automation?
While SHR Meta Search boasts a high overall rating of 4.9/5 from 143 reviews, recent feedback remains consistent, confirming its reliability. FornovaEC, on the other hand, has a perfect 5/5 rating from just 4 reviews, but lacks recent data or extensive user feedback. If your hotel’s focus is on broad metasearch visibility with proven track records, SHR Group’s platform provides stronger, more validated results. Are you confident in choosing a platform with a large, active user base, or do you prefer a niche solution with highly specialized marketing tools?
If your hotel needs a metasearch platform with a global reach, extensive partner integrations, and a focus on driving direct bookings, SHR Meta Search is your best fit. Its 81 verified partners—including major channel managers and PMS providers—and regions across Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, and more ensure broad market coverage. FornovaEC, with fewer verified partners and a narrower regional footprint, is better suited for properties that prioritize automated digital marketing and conversion optimization, especially in resorts or properties targeting digital marketing-savvy audiences.
Hoteliers with a strong emphasis on reducing OTA commissions and increasing visibility across multiple platforms should lean toward SHR Meta Search, thanks to its proven track record and extensive partner network. Conversely, if your team aims to enhance online advertising ROI through sophisticated automation and market insights, FornovaEC’s targeted approach offers the potential for higher conversion rates. Which approach aligns more closely with your strategic goals?
SHR Meta Search’s platform scores 4.72/5 for ease of use, with many reviewers highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward bid management. Its onboarding process, rated 4.69/5, is generally smooth, with numerous users praising the dedicated support team, although some mention initial setup complexity.
FornovaEC surpasses in user-friendliness with a perfect 5/5 rating, and users describe its interface as highly accessible, with simple campaign automation and clear market insights. Its onboarding process is also rated 5/5, with clients noting quick implementation and proactive support.
Edge: FornovaEC.
SHR Meta Search offers three shared features—such as bid management, visibility monitoring, and channel performance tracking—and an exclusive feature: e-commerce consulting, which guides your online strategy. Its focus on continuous CPC and visibility optimization ensures your hotel surfaces prominently across major metasearch platforms.
FornovaEC provides three shared features and introduces a unique marketing dashboard that offers real-time campaign analytics and automation tools, aimed at maximizing digital marketing ROI. While both platforms excel at data-driven marketing, SHR Meta Search’s strength lies in its extensive distribution network, whereas FornovaEC emphasizes campaign automation and market intelligence.
Edge: SHR Meta Search.
SHR Group’s support team is rated 4.84/5, with many reviews citing proactive, knowledgeable assistance that helps optimize campaign performance and troubleshoot issues efficiently. Clients appreciate their responsiveness but note that support response times can sometimes be slow during peak periods.
FornovaEC’s support is rated a perfect 5/5, with users praising their attentive, quick, and insightful service. The team’s expertise in digital marketing and distribution has been consistently highlighted as a key factor in user satisfaction.
Edge: FornovaEC.
SHR Meta Search boasts 81 verified partners, including major industry players like RMS, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Profitroom. Its extensive integration ecosystem covers a wide range of PMS, channel managers, and distribution platforms, making it highly adaptable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
FornovaEC has only 8 verified partners, primarily focusing on core marketing and distribution tools, including Fornova’s own systems and MyCloud Hospitality PMS. While its integrations are sufficient for targeted marketing, SHR’s broader ecosystem offers more flexibility.
Edge: SHR Meta Search.
SHR Group’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.9/5 overall rating from 143 reviews, and an NPS score of 9.5/5. Hoteliers across various segments—especially city center, boutique, and resort properties—praise its visibility management and ROI improvements.
FornovaEC, with only four reviews, maintains a perfect 5/5 rating and an NPS of 9.75/5. However, the small sample size and lack of recent reviews make it difficult to assess broader satisfaction. SHR’s larger, more recent review volume makes it the more reliable indicator.
Edge: SHR Meta Search.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models, which typically involve custom quotes based on hotel size, region, and feature needs. SHR Meta Search’s pricing likely includes ongoing management fees and CPC costs, while FornovaEC’s focus on automation suggests subscription-based models, but concrete figures are unavailable.
Your team should request tailored proposals from each provider to compare total costs based on your hotel’s unique profile and marketing goals.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference lies in scope: SHR Meta Search excels in broad metasearch distribution, reducing your OTA dependence and amplifying visibility with over 80 partners. FornovaEC, in contrast, centers on automating digital marketing campaigns, optimizing conversion, and providing market intelligence for targeted advertising.
Choose SHR Meta Search if your primary goal is extensive metasearch exposure, proven distribution, and regional reach, especially if you want a platform with a large, active ecosystem. Opt for FornovaEC if your focus is on sophisticated campaign automation, market insights, and maximizing digital marketing ROI for properties that are already digitally mature.
For hotels seeking a reliable, well-rounded metasearch management solution backed by extensive integrations and proven results, SHR Meta Search is the stronger choice. If your hotel’s strategy is centered on automated, data-driven marketing campaigns with a focus on conversion, FornovaEC could be the better fit.
In summary: FornovaEC may be appealing for highly specialized digital marketing needs, but SHR Meta Search’s larger user base, recent reviews, and comprehensive partner network make it the more dependable platform for most hotels today.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Meta Search and FornovaEC (E-Commerce Optimizer) share 3 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| E-commerce consulting | ||
| Marketing dashboard |
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Reviews frequently mention the excellent support and account management provided by Avvio. Users appreciate their account managers' proactive approach... Reviews frequently mention the excellent support and account management provided by Avvio. Users appreciate their account managers' proactive approach, industry knowledge, and responsiveness. Many reviews highlight specific account managers by name, emphasizing their critical role in achieving business objectives and improving the overall customer experience.
The Avvio booking engine is praised for its ability to significantly increase direct bookings and conversion rates, while also enhancing the user expe... The Avvio booking engine is praised for its ability to significantly increase direct bookings and conversion rates, while also enhancing the user experience for both guests and hotel staff. Many reviews highlight notable improvements in revenue and a higher return on investment, thanks to effective digital marketing and efficient booking processes.
Avvio's digital marketing strategies, particularly its SEO and PPC campaigns, are highly regarded. Users note significant improvements in online visib... Avvio's digital marketing strategies, particularly its SEO and PPC campaigns, are highly regarded. Users note significant improvements in online visibility and ROI, attributing these successes to the guidance and expertise provided by the Avvio team. The consistent updates and proactive suggestions help hoteliers stay ahead of trends and maximize their digital presence.
Where hoteliers push back
Many reviews appreciate Avvio's design capabilities but suggest areas for improvement in visual and aesthetic customization. Users desire more flexibi... Many reviews appreciate Avvio's design capabilities but suggest areas for improvement in visual and aesthetic customization. Users desire more flexibility in website and booking engine design to better align with their brand's unique look and feel.
Some users express concerns about the cost associated with Avvio's services, mentioning that while the tools and support are valuable, the pricing can... Some users express concerns about the cost associated with Avvio's services, mentioning that while the tools and support are valuable, the pricing can be steep. They suggest more transparent pricing models or additional value-added features to justify the investment.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Meta Search and FornovaEC (E-Commerce Optimizer) share many core Hotel Metasearch Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Meta Search offers 81 verified integration partners, while FornovaEC (E-Commerce Optimizer) offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. FornovaEC (E-Commerce Optimizer) leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Meta Search: No. FornovaEC (E-Commerce Optimizer): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Metasearch Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 52 and Fornova has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor