The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 71 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hotelogix shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive.
rajakamar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 71 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 71 | 0 |
After analyzing 71 verified reviews, Hotelogix users most value its support team, ease of use, booking management, while rajakamar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-based Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Miscellaneous Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality Improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 44 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #27 13 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #27 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #32 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 27 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 10 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #30 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #37 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #30 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 48 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #21 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel hinges on multiple factors like user experience, features, support, and market presence. Hotelogix Booking Engine, formerly AxisRooms, offers a tested, feature-rich platform with a strong track record, while rajakamar remains relatively untested with no recent reviews or verified integrations. Your decision should be guided by your hotel’s size, complexity, and need for proven reliability.
Hotelogix’s extensive review history, recent 6-month feedback, and high user ratings position it as the more dependable choice. Meanwhile, rajakamar’s absence of recent customer feedback and integrations suggests limited credibility or market penetration. Do you prioritize a trusted, well-supported platform, or are you willing to explore lesser-known options?
Hotelogix, with its 60 reviews and a 77.24/100 score, has established itself as a reliable booking engine for hotels of all sizes across multiple regions, including South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, superior support, and a rich feature set, making it a preferred choice for hotels seeking stability and proven performance.
In contrast, rajakamar has no recent reviews, market presence, or verified integrations. This absence indicates it’s a less proven option, likely less capable of handling complex booking needs or multi-property management. Hotelogix’s global reach and high customer satisfaction make it the safer, more assured choice for your hotel’s booking needs.
If your hotel needs a system with extensive integrations, proven reliability, and a track record of high customer satisfaction, go with Hotelogix. Its 25 verified partners and positive reviews about support, ease of use, and feature richness make it suitable for hotels needing robust, scalable solutions.
If your hotel is small or just starting out and you prefer a system without verified integrations or recent customer feedback, you might consider rajakamar. However, given the lack of recent reviews and market data, Hotelogix remains the more dependable choice for most hotels seeking a proven booking platform.
Hotelogix boasts a 4.69/5 ease of use rating based on 60 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface and straightforward booking management. Its onboarding process generally receives positive feedback, averaging 4.46/5, and users highlight simple navigation and mobile responsiveness.
In contrast, rajakamar has no recent review data or usability ratings, making it impossible to assess its user experience. Given Hotelogix’s high scores and ongoing customer satisfaction, it clearly has the advantage in ease of use.
Edge: Hotelogix.
Hotelogix offers notable features such as mobile optimization and dynamic tariffs, which are absent in rajakamar. Its system supports multi-property management, detailed reporting, and seamless integration with 25 verified partners, including prominent industry players like SiteMinder and HotelRunner.
Meanwhile, rajakamar does not list any unique features, and its lack of integrations limits its potential. Hotelogix’s feature set and market integrations make it the more comprehensive tool for hotels aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
Edge: Hotelogix.
Hotelogix’s customer support scores 4.73/5 with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and 24/7 availability. Users describe the support team as effective, with swift problem resolution, contributing significantly to user satisfaction.
Since rajakamar lacks recent reviews or verified support ratings, it’s impossible to gauge its support quality. Hotelogix’s proven support infrastructure and high satisfaction ratings give it a clear edge in customer service.
Edge: Hotelogix.
Hotelogix has 25 verified integrations with industry-leading partners like Omnibees, STAAH, and SiteMinder, allowing smooth connections with various PMS, channel managers, and payment gateways. These integrations enable you to automate booking flows and reduce manual work.
In contrast, rajakamar has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other critical systems. For robust operations and future scalability, Hotelogix’s extensive partner network is the clear winner.
Edge: Hotelogix.
Hotelogix’s overall rating of 3.64/5 from 60 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature depth, shows consistent user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—especially resorts and boutique properties—highlight its reliability and helpful support.
With no recent reviews or ratings available for rajakamar, it’s impossible to determine user sentiment. Hotelogix’s strong, recent feedback confirms its standing as the preferred platform for hoteliers.
Edge: Hotelogix.
Hotelogix does not publish specific pricing, but it offers a subscription-based model without a freemium option or implementation fees. This suggests a predictable, scalable pricing structure, typical of enterprise booking engines.
Rajakamar’s pricing details are unavailable, which can be a concern for hotels needing clarity on costs. Given Hotelogix’s transparent approach and proven value ratings, it’s the more predictable investment.
Hotels that should consider Hotelogix include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that might consider rajakamar include:
Not ideal if:
Hotelogix offers a comprehensive, well-supported booking engine with proven success across various regions and hotel types. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and high recent review scores make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel values stability, support, and proven performance, choose Hotelogix. Its broad market presence and positive user feedback clearly position it ahead of rajakamar, which remains an unverified, less proven alternative.
Conversely, if your hotel is small, local, or just starting out, and you’re willing to accept the risks of limited reviews and integrations, rajakamar could be an option—though its lack of recent data makes it a less confident pick. For most hotels seeking efficiency and peace of mind, Hotelogix should be your primary choice.
According to HTR's product database, Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) and rajakamar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Tariffs |
What hoteliers love
The support team for Hotelogix is highly praised for being responsive, effective, and available 24/7. Many reviewers singled out individual team membe... The support team for Hotelogix is highly praised for being responsive, effective, and available 24/7. Many reviewers singled out individual team members for their exceptional service, highlighting swift problem resolution and helpful guidance. The consistent support leads to improved user satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Users repeatedly praise the ease of use of Hotelogix. The system's uncomplicated steps and user-friendly design make it accessible even for those less... Users repeatedly praise the ease of use of Hotelogix. The system's uncomplicated steps and user-friendly design make it accessible even for those less familiar with hotel management software. The software's intuitive layout streamlines daily operations, making it easier to train staff and manage tasks.
Reviewers appreciate Hotelogix's effective booking management system. The tool provides seamless booking integration, easy tracking of past reservatio... Reviewers appreciate Hotelogix's effective booking management system. The tool provides seamless booking integration, easy tracking of past reservations, and hassle-free handling of multiple bookings. Additionally, it helps prevent overbooking and simplifies the reservation process.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviewers also provided miscellaneous feedback for improvements, such as enhancing the speed of loading, integrating material management features, and... Reviewers also provided miscellaneous feedback for improvements, such as enhancing the speed of loading, integrating material management features, and better post-audit flexibility. These suggestions highlight areas where Hotelogix could further optimize user satisfaction.
While generally praised, some users express dissatisfaction with Hotelogix's user interface, describing it as dated. Although improvements are noted,... While generally praised, some users express dissatisfaction with Hotelogix's user interface, describing it as dated. Although improvements are noted, reviewers suggest that modernizing the UI would enhance the overall user experience.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) and rajakamar share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) offers 25 verified integration partners, while rajakamar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms): No. rajakamar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hotelogix has an HT Score of 77 and rajakamar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor