The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ayenda shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Ayenda users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ayenda |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Ayenda by Ayenda and Shiji Daylight PMS ultimately hinges on your hotel's needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature sets, and market presence. Ayenda is a new entrant with no recent reviews, while Shiji boasts a well-established reputation backed by over 30 recent reviews. Is your hotel ready for a more comprehensive, tested solution? Or are you exploring a potentially simpler option?
Ayenda offers a hotel management solution with no user reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance or reliability. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS has accumulated 32 reviews in the last six months, with a high 8.94/10 NPS score and a 90% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong validation from the user community.
While Ayenda's core features remain unlisted, Shiji provides a rich suite of 98 functionalities, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, and automation tools—features that are evident in its positive reviews. Shiji’s presence across 18 countries and its extensive partner network further reinforce its credibility and global applicability. Given the recent reviews and high customer satisfaction, it’s clear Shiji is a more proven option for hotels seeking a comprehensive PMS.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS with proven performance, go with Shiji Daylight. Its robust suite of 98 features, solid customer support, high usability ratings, and broad market reach make it suitable for hotels of all sizes—especially those looking to scale operations or enhance guest personalization.
If your hotel is a smaller operation or exploring automation with limited budget, Ayenda’s lack of reviews and unclear feature set make it a risky choice. Shiji is better suited for properties that prioritize reliability, extensive integrations, and ongoing support.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores an impressive 4.63/5 in ease of use, with numerous reviews praising its intuitive interface, helpful training materials, and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight its quick learning curve, which accelerates staff adoption and minimizes operational disruption.
Ayenda, however, has a 0/5 rating without any reviews or feedback, indicating no available data on usability or user experience. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess how smoothly your team could adopt Ayenda.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji offers a comprehensive array of 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual capabilities, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, housekeping module, payment processing, and automation tools—all absent from Ayenda’s offering. These features support operational efficiency, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Ayenda's feature set remains undisclosed, but given the lack of reviews or detailed descriptions, it’s unlikely to match Shiji’s extensive capabilities. For hotels seeking a complete, scalable PMS, Shiji’s feature depth clearly outperforms Ayenda.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji’s customer support is rated 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful training materials. Support teams are praised for aiding smooth implementations and ongoing assistance, which is critical for operational continuity.
Ayenda has zero reviews, offering no insight into support quality. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to compare, but the absence of recent reviews suggests limited validation or visibility.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji’s system boasts 64 verified partner integrations, including well-known platforms like SiteMinder, Revinate, Duetto, Amadeus, and Oaky. These integrations facilitate smooth data flow, revenue management, marketing, and operational automation.
Ayenda, with no verified partners listed, offers no indication of integration capabilities. Hotels seeking a PMS that connects seamlessly with other systems will find Shiji’s extensive network more advantageous.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Based on recent reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS holds a strong reputation, with an 8.94/10 NPS score and a 90% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high satisfaction across diverse hotel segments. Reviewers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially for larger or tech-forward properties.
Ayenda’s lack of recent reviews or ratings makes it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the available data, Shiji’s proven track record and positive feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Ayenda’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a freemium or trial option, indicating possible custom quotes or undisclosed costs.
Shiji charges $1,200 monthly, with no free tier or trial offered. Its clear pricing model simplifies budgeting but might be steep for smaller hotels or those with limited budgets.
Shiji Daylight PMS is a well-established, full-featured platform with proven performance, support, and integration capabilities. Its broad adoption and recent positive reviews underscore its reliability for larger or growing properties.
Ayenda appears as an untested option with no recent user feedback or proven features. For hotels seeking stability, extensive functionality, and a vendor with a track record, Shiji is the clear choice.
If your hotel values experience, comprehensive features, and proven support, go with Shiji Daylight. Its extensive capabilities and recent high ratings make it a safe and scalable investment.
However, if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or simply testing PMS solutions, and Ayenda’s future offerings meet your basic needs, it might be worth exploring once more details or reviews emerge. For now, Shiji’s established presence and robust user validation outweigh Ayenda’s nascent position.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Ayenda |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Ayenda and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ayenda and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ayenda offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ayenda: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ayenda has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor