The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 85 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bakuun.com Ltd shines .
Blastness shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 85 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 85 |
After analyzing 85 verified reviews, Bakuun.com Ltd users most value its , while Blastness users highlight channel management, support and assistance, revenue management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Assistance
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
System Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 48 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #33 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 25 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 36 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #11 18 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #7 83 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 0 reviews |
Choosing the right channel management solution for your hotel hinges on the specific needs of your property and operational priorities. Both Bakuun and Blastness aim to connect your hotel to distribution channels, but they approach this goal differently. Bakuun offers an all-in-one platform focusing on simplifying global distribution and payments, while Blastness emphasizes comprehensive channel management, revenue optimization, and detailed integration features. The key question is: which product aligns better with your hotel’s scale, complexity, and growth ambitions?
Bakuun's core strength is its broad connectivity and payment solutions, making it suitable for hotels seeking a straightforward, unified platform. Conversely, Blastness's more feature-rich environment, especially in revenue management and multi-channel automation, caters to hotels that need detailed control and data insights. Are you looking for simplicity or depth? The choice depends on your hotel’s current and future requirements.
Both products target hotels aiming to expand their distribution, but they differ significantly in scope and user experience. Bakuun, with its all-in-one travel tech platform, focuses on connecting hotels directly with travel partners, simplifying contracting, and streamlining payments—making it ideal for hotels looking for a single point of control. Blastness, on the other hand, offers a dedicated channel manager with 15 unique features, including yield rules, inventory management, and multi-lingual support, tailored for hotels that want detailed control over their distribution.
The biggest divergence is in customer feedback: Blastness has 81 reviews with a high recent activity, and a score of 79.32, indicating strong user confidence. Bakuun has no reviews yet, which makes its reliability and user satisfaction harder to assess. If your hotel needs a proven, well-reviewed solution, Blastness is the safer bet. How important is immediate, peer-backed confidence to your team’s decision?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich channel management tool that offers real-time inventory updates, revenue management, and seamless PMS integration, Blastness is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—such as yield rules, inventory grid, and multi-currency support—caters to hotels with complex distribution needs.
If your hotel prioritizes simplifying distribution and payments while expanding globally, Bakuun might appeal. It emphasizes direct connectivity to travel partners and aims to reduce transaction costs, ideal for hotels looking to scale without managing multiple systems. Given Blastness’s recent review activity and high customer satisfaction, it’s better suited for hotels seeking reliability and advanced distribution tools.
User experience is crucial for staff adoption and daily operations. Blastness scores 4.84 out of 5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, clear instructions, and seamless integration with existing PMS systems. Customers highlight its straightforward process for managing inventory, rates, and distribution channels, making day-to-day management less burdensome.
Bakuun, however, receives no ratings or reviews, which leaves its usability untested and uncertain. Without tangible feedback, it’s difficult to judge how easy it will be for your team to onboard and operate effectively. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness surpasses Bakuun significantly in features, offering 15 unique functionalities such as yield rules, inventory management, multi-lingual support, and integrated payment processing. These features enable sophisticated automation, dynamic pricing, and granular control over distribution, setting it apart from Bakuun’s minimal feature set.
Bakuun, by comparison, supports basic distribution and payment management but lacks the extensive tools available in Blastness. If your hotel requires detailed revenue management, multi-currency support, or inventory control, Blastness’s feature set clearly edges ahead. Edge: Blastness.
Customer support ratings reflect recent and consistent positive feedback for Blastness, scoring 4.88 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, professional assistance and proactive account management. Clients mention their support team’s quick replies and ongoing strategic insights, enhancing their operational confidence.
Bakuun offers no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. This absence increases uncertainty about post-implementation assistance, critical for hotels new to channel management. Given current data, Blastness’s support reputation is more reliable. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness integrates with 15 verified partners, including major PMS and CRS platforms, and supports real-time data exchange with features like channel self-mapping and PMS connectivity. Notably, it shares a connection with Mews, and offers integrations with Oracle Hospitality and Vertical Booking among others.
Bakuun claims 22 verified partners, including notable GDS and booking engines such as SiteMinder, TravelLine, and Beds24. However, it has no reviews or recent activity to validate its integration performance or reliability. Given Blastness’s current partner network and active user base, it provides more confidence in its integration capabilities. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness has 81 recent reviews, with a high NPS score of 9.74 out of 10, and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its users, primarily mid-sized and upscale hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and comprehensive features across segments like city center hotels and resorts.
Bakuun’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful rating assessment, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction. Without peer feedback, Blastness remains the more trusted option based on current ratings and recent reviews. Edge: Blastness.
Bakuun charges a straightforward $200 monthly fee, with no freemium or implementation costs. Its pricing model is simple and transparent, suitable for hotels seeking predictable expenses.
Blastness does not list specific pricing, but as a feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, it likely targets hotels with larger budgets or complex needs. The absence of transparent pricing suggests it’s tailored to hotels valuing customized solutions. If cost predictability is key, Bakuun’s flat fee might be advantageous. If you’re willing to invest in advanced features, explore Blastness’s value proposition.
Hotels that need a global, all-in-one platform to manage distribution, contracting, and payments efficiently will benefit from Bakuun’s integrated approach. It’s well-suited for hotels prioritizing direct connections, simplified onboarding, and reducing transaction costs.
Teams that prefer a straightforward, less feature-intensive solution, or hotels expanding into new markets with a focus on payments and partner connectivity, will find Bakuun ideal. Not ideal if your hotel requires detailed revenue management or complex inventory controls.
Hotels that aim to maximize revenue through dynamic pricing, granular inventory control, and multichannel distribution should consider Blastness. Its range of features suits boutique, resort, and city hotel segments that need automation and detailed reporting.
Teams managing multiple properties or seeking to improve online visibility and booking performance will appreciate Blastness’s advanced tools. Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very small scale or prefers a basic distribution solution without extensive feature needs.
Blastness stands out as a highly-rated, feature-rich platform trusted by numerous hotels, especially for its advanced distribution, revenue management, and support functions. Its recent review activity and high satisfaction scores make it a dependable choice for hotels that need depth and sophistication.
Bakuun offers a streamlined, affordable entry point with a focus on direct connectivity and payments, but its lack of reviews makes its reliability uncertain. If your hotel values proven performance and comprehensive features, Blastness is the clear winner. If simplicity and cost predictability are more important, consider Bakuun, but proceed with caution given the limited feedback.
In summary, for hotels seeking a trusted, well-reviewed solution with extensive features and recent positive feedback, Blastness is the recommended choice. Its high customer satisfaction, broad integrations, and detailed controls make it suitable for hotels wanting to optimize their distribution and revenue strategies. Meanwhile, Bakuun might appeal to those prioritizing straightforward global connectivity and payment solutions, but the absence of recent reviews makes it a riskier option.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Bakuun and Blastness Channel Manager share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
What hoteliers love
The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find... The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find it intuitive and crucial for streamlined distribution management across multiple channels.
While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better... While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better address urgent issues.
Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven... Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven approach allows for dynamic pricing, enhancing overall profitability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bakuun and Blastness Channel Manager share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Bakuun offers 22 verified integration partners, while Blastness Channel Manager offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bakuun: No. Blastness Channel Manager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bakuun.com Ltd has an HT Score of 0 and Blastness has 78. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor