The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 49 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Beekeeper shines in ease of use and ROI , with exclusive features like Mobile Access and SMS text messaging.
Guestware shines when it comes to user training and support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Lost & found module and Late checkouts.
Side-by-side ratings based on 49 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 20 | 29 |
After analyzing 49 verified reviews, Beekeeper users most value its , while Guestware users highlight user training and support, task management and automation, guest service enhancement. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Task management and automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest service enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System complexity and usability
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and other systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Real-time connectivity issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #17 1 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 8 reviews | #17 5 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #12 5 reviews | #7 17 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 4 reviews | #8 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #16 8 reviews | #11 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #14 11 reviews | #8 16 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #12 9 reviews | #8 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #19 1 reviews | #17 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #10 18 reviews | #8 19 reviews |
| Europe | #19 1 reviews | #14 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #13 0 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
| Middle East | #7 1 reviews | — |
When choosing a staff collaboration tool for your hotel, the decision hinges on your operational focus. Beekeeper and Guestware both aim to streamline communication and improve service, but they cater to different hotel needs. Beekeeper emphasizes employee engagement and team communication, especially for non-desk staff, while Guestware centers on operational automation, guest issue tracking, and task management. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products aim to enhance internal workflows, but they diverge in capabilities and user experience. Beekeeper’s strength lies in fostering a connected, informed staff, and Guestware excels in automating guest service and maintenance processes. Are you prioritizing team engagement or operational efficiency?
Beekeeper and Guestware are designed to tackle distinct challenges within hotel management. Beekeeper acts as a unified communication app for non-desk employees, emphasizing engagement, multilingual messaging, and information sharing across teams. Guestware, on the other hand, consolidates guest requests, work orders, and preventative maintenance into a single platform, making daily operations more efficient.
While Beekeeper has a higher overall rating (4.85/5 vs 4.43/5) and more recent reviews, Guestware boasts a broader feature set (14 unique features vs 22 in Beekeeper), especially for operational tasks. Beekeeper’s reviews highlight ease of use and improved morale, with comments praising its social media-like interface and multilingual capabilities. Guestware’s users focus on automation, detailed reporting, and integration with PMS, though some find it complex and demanding in training.
Ultimately, your choice depends on your hotel’s core need: staff engagement and communication or operational automation and guest service management. Do you want a platform that boosts team morale or one that optimizes behind-the-scenes processes?
If your hotel needs to improve internal communication, employee engagement, and cross-departmental information sharing, go with Beekeeper. It’s ideal for properties seeking to foster a connected staff environment, especially where non-desk employees comprise a large portion of the workforce.
If your goal is to streamline guest service, automate tasks, and manage maintenance more efficiently, Guestware is the better option. It suits hotels that want detailed reporting, automation of repetitive tasks, and tight integration with PMS systems for a seamless operational flow.
For boutique hotels or properties emphasizing staff morale, Beekeeper’s user-friendly interface and high review scores make it the top choice. Conversely, larger resorts or hotels focused on operational control and guest issue resolution should lean toward Guestware.
Beekeeper’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.78/5 UI rating, with reviews emphasizing its simple, social-media-like interface that staff find intuitive. Its onboarding process averages 4.66/5, and customers praise the support team as "fantastic" and "helpful," making staff adoption smoother.
Guestware, rated at 4.34/5 for ease of use, is often described as feature-rich but more complex, requiring more intensive training. Users mention that navigating and fully utilizing its extensive options can be challenging, increasing the learning curve.
Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper offers 22 unique features, including employee onboarding, multilingual messaging, automation workflows, and employee recognition, not available in Guestware. It supports SMS messaging, in-app translation, and engagement analytics, making it a comprehensive communication platform.
Guestware provides 14 exclusive features centered on operational needs, such as a guest request portal, work order management, preventative maintenance, and case management. These features focus on automating guest service and internal maintenance workflows.
Given the extensive feature set of Beekeeper, especially for communication, it edges out in versatility. However, if your focus is detailed operational automation, Guestware’s specialized tools are valuable.
Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper’s support ratings are slightly higher (4.83/5) than Guestware’s (4.59/5). Customers praise Beekeeper’s customer service as "fantastic," emphasizing quick, helpful responses that facilitate smoother onboarding and issue resolution.
Guestware’s support is also highly regarded, with clients emphasizing personalized attention from account reps like Jeff Bowes, and noting that support helps them adapt the system to their needs. While both are strong, Beekeeper’s recent reviews suggest more consistent positive support experiences.
Edge: Beekeeper.
Both platforms have verified integrations with nine partners, including Oracle Hospitality. Shared integrations include common systems like PMS solutions, but Beekeeper lists additional partners such as Revinate and Kronos, expanding its connectivity options.
Guestware’s integrations focus on hotel operations and guest management, with notable partners like Maestro PMS and IRIS Systems. Its open API enables custom integrations, but some users express frustration over real-time data flow and connectivity issues.
Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper’s overall rating of 4.85/5 surpasses Guestware’s 4.43/5. Based on recent reviews, Beekeeper’s clients—especially in boutique hotels, resorts, and independent properties—are more likely to recommend it, with a 98% likelihood versus 86% for Guestware.
Review scores from different segments show Beekeeper receiving top ratings from boutique hotels (5/5) and independent properties (5/5). Guestware, while favored in resorts and standard hotels, generally garners slightly lower scores, reflecting more mixed experiences.
Edge: Beekeeper.
Pricing details for both are unavailable, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. No free trials or freemium options are offered, so costs are likely tailored and potentially significant.
Your hotel should contact both vendors directly for quotes, considering your size and operational complexity before making a decision.
Not ideal if your focus is solely on guest-facing operations or maintenance automation without strong internal communication needs.
Not ideal if your primary focus is internal staff engagement or if you prefer a more straightforward, less feature-rich system.
Core Difference: Beekeeper focuses on employee communication and engagement, while Guestware emphasizes operational automation and guest service management.
When to choose Beekeeper: If your hotel needs to improve team communication, foster a positive workplace culture, and simplify non-desk staff interactions, Beekeeper’s high user ratings and recent positive reviews make it the better fit.
When to choose Guestware: For hotels that want to automate guest requests, streamline maintenance, and gain detailed operational reports, Guestware’s extensive features and integrations will serve you well, despite its steeper learning curve.
Final verdict: If internal communication and staff engagement are your top priorities, go with Beekeeper. If operational automation and guest service insights are more critical, opt for Guestware. Both are valuable tools, but your specific needs should guide your decision.
According to HTR's product database, Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) and Guestware share 1 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Customer Support & Resources | ||
| Customization & Security | ||
| Employee Communication | ||
| Employee onboarding | ||
| In app translation | ||
| Late checkouts | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Mobile Access | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Virtual logbook |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Customer feedback emphasizes Guestware's excellent training and support services. Users often mention Jeff Bowes and other account managers who provid... Customer feedback emphasizes Guestware's excellent training and support services. Users often mention Jeff Bowes and other account managers who provide thorough training and quick problem resolution.
The software excels in dispatching and tracking tasks, particularly housekeeping and maintenance work. Users appreciate the automated assignment of ta... The software excels in dispatching and tracking tasks, particularly housekeeping and maintenance work. Users appreciate the automated assignment of tasks and the ability to monitor completion, which leads to higher efficiency.
Users highlight how Guestware improves guest service by tracking guest preferences and issues. This enables personalized guest experiences and timely... Users highlight how Guestware improves guest service by tracking guest preferences and issues. This enables personalized guest experiences and timely resolution of complaints, which are crucial for creating WOW moments.
Where hoteliers push back
While praised for its features, Guestware is noted for being complex. Some users find the system challenging due to extensive options and difficult na... While praised for its features, Guestware is noted for being complex. Some users find the system challenging due to extensive options and difficult navigation, which can increase training time and lead to errors.
Integrating Guestware with Property Management Systems (PMS) and other hotel software is a frequently mentioned feature, though some users indicate ch... Integrating Guestware with Property Management Systems (PMS) and other hotel software is a frequently mentioned feature, though some users indicate challenges with full connectivity and real-time data flow.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) and Guestware share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) offers 9 verified integration partners, while Guestware offers 9. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Beekeeper (Digital Workspace): No. Guestware: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Beekeeper has an HT Score of 0 and Guestware has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor